[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"][QUOTE="dreman999"] That the main difference, it only has object tracking, Natal is controller free for now. All it needs is away to make your character none stationary and it set. Think of what it can do, adventurer games, puzzle games, driving, sports, and etc. This also means that our current controller will stay the same, too.Odrec

What? are you talking about sony's eyetoy? lol. Thats a shame. I'm just saying if it works as advertised...then it would be a first in videogames.

The impressions from Kotaku have been very postive. I think it will be great for certain games but horrible for others. I will wait for support software to actually pass judgement. I will probably get it just for UI though.

spinecaton

If the demo video is true and it does whatthey say it can do..especially being able to motion scan objects for the game your playing. Tiger Woods would finally be fun again. If you have clubs at home...just grab them and scan them and use them while your playin the game. I rather use a real club in a game than a remote. I've tried with Tiger Woods 08' for the Wii and it blows. Just make sure tighted up your grips on your clubs so they wont slip and knock someone out lol. What I saw on monday was the first real step towards virtual reality in videogames. Win or fail...we might be witnessing the first small step towards the future of videogames beyond the barriers of controllers and remotes...Damn again, I just love the whole idea about scanning objects and using them for props for your videogames, if you wanted too. I've been playing videogames for 20+ years and I have too say that Project Natal is one of the best and most exciting innovations I've seen in videogames...period! If only it just does what they say it can do andthen the whole Milo demo freaked me out...I only say this because I still remember playing the Atari 7200 and that Milo thing seemed like some sort of weird scifi/skynet end of the world **** .

Night Trap for the SegaCD. Yeah I grew up in the 80's so what? Hell..they didn't even score it. The soundtrack from the game was atleast a 4.0....

Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire for the N64 a 7.1 score, not bad? butsad though...with alittle more development to fix some flaws that game would have been sweet. Loved the final stage.

Doom64 score 4.8. was a great port from the PC back in it's day...a bloody game for the Nintendo for it's time. Underrated FPS for consoles in it's time...because it was new to the platforms to have FPS. Body's on stakes in the pits of Hell..it deserves atleast a 5

notables...

Beavis and Butt-head: Bunghole in One a score of 4.3 never played it actually..but for some reason it seems like I missed the party.

Starship Troopers 3.8 actually a fun game

Ripper for the PC. a 3.6..Christopher Walken, the Dude from Goodtimes, and insane puzzles.

Counter-Strike: Source... gamespot gave it nothing!?!

Silverload for the PS1. oh wait! I might be the only one whoever played it. Crazy game and creepy.

Snatcher for the SegaCD..the first time I ever played it. I played it all the way through..I couldn't stop.

Ground Zero Texas for the SegaCD.

I'm going with Left 4 Dead... given gamespot has previewed it alot and other sites too, but Turtle Studios only other franchise was CS before this and so they had alot to prove. Very nice console exclusive for the 360. (P.S I know it's on the PC as well)

it does kinda disgust me... look at this scenario brand new xbox $200 cool now I need a game and a way to play online left4dead + xbl = $110 wow more than half of the xbox cost is needed just to get online and play a game for your new system. ripoff confirmed.out0v0rder

I don't know where you get your logic from man...but who do you think pays for the servers for online games on the PC?? Definitely not you !! you cheapskate~! confirmed.

Seriously it does all the same things but BETTER and its less glitchy and doesnt freeze like my dash board does on 360. How does MS justify the cost of live? Do they charge because people are willing to pay for it? (and be ripped off) blues35301

[QUOTE="-Intellectual-"]

Socom: confrontation got 6.5 and Mototrstorm: pacific rift got 8.0 and both were hyped as AAA games and system sellers.

They both flopped hard and again the flops just keep coming to the ps3

campzor

This is what u get with free online play...Sony and fanboys taunts XBL users for paying $4.99 a month for good reliable and stable servers, but i guess u get what u pay for. PSN is flawed!!