Yeees, double rainbows. Because that's what matter to Gamespit.
Sorry, the rest of us; well perhaps we'd have liked a campaign with more than 5-soldier battles. How about some 'realistic' hüüge trench-warfare battles & storms'. Oh well, ''Verdun'' has already done that to the tunes of impressive player reviews, so I guess DICE just binned that option right away.
We do have some 'tank drives like a ww2 T60', but hey, its a ''kiddy bang-bang'' shoter so why not.
Now I'm not saying I dont like that Galipoli-mission. That one, its got my vote. Though it'd be nice if it lasted more than the full 32mins. to complete. [and I'm being veeery generous here].
It goes w.o. saying that said Galipoli-setting is.... wait for it: Absent from multiplayer. Zil. Bobkiss. Nada. Fukkidifak.
@fpsfragggz: So, if the truth isnt to your liking ... you just deny it.
I think a mr. D. Trump has a job offer for you. Mind you, it might expire by 8.Nov.
Good luck mate. Perhaps, eerrr consider that different people have different experienses than you. I know, its Really hard to imagine that the world can be different than your own reflection.
@Rufus_the_rat: I agree. Got the early acces/play version [gift] and I have to say compared w. all the hypeboy-screaming before they even have played it. Its meh at best.
Dont get me wrong. I like the BF, at least BF2 BC stands out as one of the better pc-shooters of the last decade. But this. Pffff.
DRviking71's comments