@ollie2000000 I'm not sure how questioning a silly and irrelevant comment is "juvenile", but whatever.

@ollie2000000 Or maybe because a lot of the hype for the original Wii was based on a lot of "what-ifs" that never materialized (or turned out to be impossible anyway) and Nintendo made a lot of promises to gamers and developers with the Wii and didn't deliver on them (example: poor software attrition rate, Operation Rainfall/Day of Crisis NA no-shows) and both jumped to Microsoft and Sony's systems, treating the Wii as a supplement at best. Those just may be the reasons why people are casting a critical eye on this new system, and not some vague "people don't talk in the real world anymore" claptrap (and seriously, you're going to posit that theory on a gaming site?).

@Hurvl The console sold incredibly well, but the games didn't. Which is why every third party developer jumped ship to the 360/PS3, and given Nintendo's own half-assed approach towards their own games (well, mostly NoA here), this statement comes off as hilariously pie-in-the-sky at best and a complete bald-faced lie at worst.

@Sevenizz Conker's wasn't a hit; it sold poorly and a big reason for that was due to it coming out so late in the N64's cycle.