Unfortunately the first Kotor game doesn't work well for a movie because it's story was just a rehash of episode 4.(So it will turn out as episode 4's second remake)

I think this one will be better than previous 2(7&8) due to the little involvement that George had in it.(Abrams asked some guidance from him from what I've heard)

But it will be less successful than 7&8.

1.Deacon has no real character development, and the game is uncritical of his more dubious actions

2.Deacon's relationship with Sarah is flat and unconvincing

3.Many narrative arcs end abruptly or lack interesting or meaningful conclusions

If the reviewer just skipped the cutscenes and didn't care about the story then the game would be an 8/10 game for her.

Edit: also this isn't a movie review it's a game review. You should have talked more about the gameplay than the story and characters.

@vega2505: That baseball bat criticism is weak. By that logic Dante uses a baseball bat and in the whole DMC franchise.(Since it doesn't insta kill enemies)

@crashchaos: Too bad Disney didn't hire Aspyr to patch it so that people don't face bugs and technical issues in the PC version.

@Hillsy_: ... Bounty Hunter,Obi Wan , Clone Wars Republic Heroes, EA Battlefront 1 and 2 , Demolition , Masters Of Teras Kasi and Kinect.

Really TFU was one of the better SW games.(But not among the best ones.)

@Shunten: Come on! the writing of JK 1 was awful. FU had a superior storyline. JK 1 had the Gary Stu of EU known as Kyle Katarn.(The guy that just became a jedo by picking up a lightsaber and managed to beat a dark jedi as powerful as Darth Vader.)

Unlike JK 1, TFU had a far better written story and the love story in FU was far better than the love story of Kyle and Jan that went nowhere.

As for gameplay in some ways FU 1 was far better than JK 2:

1.Enemies are far more smart.(Unlike JK where enemies just stand and shoot you)

2.Snipers were balanced far better.(In JK they just one hit kill you and force you to use auto save/auto load to take them out by weapons+force speed.)

3.Jump Troopers were a pain in the ass in JA while in FU they are again better balanced.(In JA it takes minutes until you manage to kill one)

4.fighting big enemies like At-sts and rancors is far better in FU 1.(While in JK 2 and JA you just use force speed and spam kill them with weapons)

5.Force powers are far superior in FU.(Grip and push are superior in FU.) and you could use force powers on objects which wasn't at all in JK excluding some room puzzles. I also like Force dash more than speed.

6. In force unleashed you should kill enemies to get HP while in JK you kill enemies, hide in a corner, use force heal repeat.

7.In JK, lightsaber combat only works well for lightsaber battles but it isn't that precise for killing stormtroopers.(Since it's easy to miss them and they might just fire at you while you are attacking which then insta kills you.)

8.In JK 2 and 3, force lighting was completely overpowered in level 3 and just a one hit can kill every non lightsaber wielding enemies.

But in some ways JK games were better:

1.Different lightsabers.

2.Lightsaber Vs Lightsaber combat.

3.multiplayer.

4.Mod Support.

5.more replay value in 1 and JA compare to FU.(Since you have more customization in force powers and you can test the ones you haven't used in the previous playthrough)

6.A more complex level design.(Only in JK 1 and 2. In JA they were absent)

7.Better camera

8.Less bugs.

Imo the ultimate SW jedi game will be a game that combines the best things from the both games.

@DarkReign2022: Nah force Unleashed was an enjoyable game unlike Bounty Hunter and those others that you mentioned.

It was even in the terms of force powers far superior to JA.(Especially force grip and push.)