No we are only getting tired of Nintendo's rehashed games. Look at Call of Duty and GTA. We know they play the same but at least they have a new story and new characters hence they are sales records. So no your comment is false and only should be in regards to Nintendo.
2nd Paragraph
If $50 to $60 is a challenge why did you start asking $60 for a Wii U game? Especially for 2D super Mario game probably has 1/4 the dev cost of a blockbuster game that deserves the $60 price.
3rd Paragraph
The improvement is less noticeable when you put out a weak console and yes I would say for your casual crowd smart phones and tablets with games costing $1 - $17 may have better value then some $60 games.
4th Paragraph
Seams like putting a spin on the conversation. First three paragraphs base the industry then he says Nintendo will add a greater amount of energy and move to amaze consumers. When you games run/ran on a 480P resolution and now barely hitting 720p. I don't think your going to amaze me. Art style only goes so far. Great attempt at spinning the issue.
5th Paragraph
So innovate and make more games with old IP's you never use.
6th Paragraph
Don't blame your sales 100% on the 360/PS3 life cycle. If you had a solid product that wouldn't matter. Sure we are all waiting to see the E3, but I bet my pinky the Wii U won't be a sales hit this gen compared to the PS4 and 720.
7th
Why don't you practice what you preach and show us something new. Not Mario saving the Princess, Not link saving Hyrule. Why don't you fire your creative artists and start over. Nintendo only innovates how I walk around the corner. Oh look now I can be one with the wall and move to a new object.
8th
So what your saying is "Nintendo won't be part of the future?"
9th
What Nintendo is really saying is "we saw the PS4 and realized our games look like shit. Time to throw on an extra coat of bling and graphics updates."
caseypayne69's comments