@Mogan: You have no idea what third party is and what it actually includes.

@game4metoo: Congrats on having the most cancerous comment. No grammar, makes no sense even when corrected and you have no evidence to back up any of your claims

@Thanatos2k: Hah, mobile is failing here not there.

@lostn: Don't be stupid. You didnt provide evidence and using games like CoD (no DLC) ME3 (released more than a year after) and AC4 (late DLC) is not a standard for sales. Using power a determining factor is something you sheep seem to gravitate to. Power sheeps, also Rayman Legends sold the best on the Wii U so your point is moot.

@Mogan: Hah, you really think Sony wants it? They expect it and they force third parties in to lengthy contracts and hide additional clauses that prevent devs from getting paid. I've seen more third party and indie say they prefer to work with Nintendo because they are friendly and give you the options right away....

Nintendo is the same company who said to make Bayonetta 2 more risque when the developers didnt want to.

@game4metoo: You're an idiot... When developers dont make games to par and don't include that extra value then you lose sales. People don't buy crap games.

@Thanatos2k: Clearly you're dumb because Japan is ahead of the curb on that one. EA, Square, Capcom, Sega.... all of them have mobile game divisions

@ztype85: Actually the reason is much deeper than that. It was confirmed EA had a part in the Nintendo Network's first incarnation. It was also confirmed that Nintendo backed out.

@emprahtoddler: That's a false statement. I'd like evidence to support that claim. Maybe if titles were up to par third parties would sell better

The sad part, I've seen people say they wont buy this game or Zelda U because of the crossdressing Link... I mean I wear makeup (everything) as a guy. Does that make me gay? No it doesnt. Don't judge something based on a 1950s mentality