When the 360 came out it was 400$ and it was as good as a high end pc. They could have come out with a new system this fall thats quite a bit more powerful than current consoles for the same price. Like I said, current consoles have 6 and 7 year old tech in them. So it's not like new consoles would need bleeding edge stuff to easily outdo what we have now.
nah, next gen can wait another year or even 2 in my opinion. If the next gen came out last year or this year it would barely be better than the Xbox 360. If they wait until 2014 to release the next gen, manufacturing costs will be down enough to where the average game on the next Xbox will look like Battlefield 3 on the PC maxed out and the console itself will be $300-$400 at the most.
JayQproductions
How would it barely be better than the 360? The 360 is using like 7 year old technology. If we had new systems last year, they would be a big leap from both the 360 and ps3
I'm not only about graphics, but i have to admit it kinda sucks when you see the same game on PC thats on consoles, and it looks miles better. Not only that, new technology will allow us to have more complicated physics, better a.i., and just more for the developers to work with. also, we'd be able to have many more people in a game at once for online multiplayer games. yes, im still looking forward to some games coming out in this generation, but with next gen technology, even those games could be quite a bit better. i say bring on the next gen already.
jsmoke03
you ready to pay $70-80 per game again? i'm assuming you know more pòwerful systems mean bigger game budgets, meaning the gamers end up paying more for games I'm assuming you know there really wasn't a jump in price from last generation, and pc games have been set at 50$ for a while and they're much more powerful than consoles. Games will not be anywhere near 80$, and I'm willing to bet there will be no price increase whatsoever. Hell, some snes games used to be close to 100$ and nowadays we play games that cost wayy more than those games to make, but we only pay 60$.
I'm not only about graphics, but i have to admit it kinda sucks when you see the same game on PC thats on consoles, and it looks miles better. Not only that, new technology will allow us to have more complicated physics, better a.i., and just more for the developers to work with. also, we'd be able to have many more people in a game at once for online multiplayer games. yes, im still looking forward to some games coming out in this generation, but with next gen technology, even those games could be quite a bit better. i say bring on the next gen already.
yeah i ended up just buying it, and it doesnt support legacy controls which is pretty frustrating. for what its worth, legacy thumbsticks is where you move forward/back AND look left/right all with the left stick, and you strafe and look up/down with the right. its an old school layout but ive played with it every since goldeneye on the n64, then the first halo. so im just alot more comfortable with that layout. i still can play games on default, its just not as enjoyable because im not as accurate.
[QUOTE="_SOULtoSQUEEZE_"]Like in the control options menu, what control schemes does it offer? Default, southpaw, legacy? I'm looking to see if it has legacy control schemeEssian
You can completely customize the controls. Any button, any action. It may have limits, but it doesn't seem to. You can also customize sensitivity and right/lefty. Not sure if that will influence ur decision Thanks man sounds good. I'll give it a go.
Does anyone know if the game will offer the legacy thumbstick control scheme? I've been using legacy since goldeneye and was looking to pick up global offensive, but I'd like to know if they offer my control layout first. Thanks in advance
Log in to comment