Ok, not unplayable. But you know what I mean. 4.5 is really really shit these days. And I don't think he should say it is that bad. Even if he does not like it. I'm sure he has integretiy. But the score has to reflect that a lot of people would like the game, in order to be accurate. @. saigo "and therefore, not enjoyable to the majority of gamers" If this is the meaning of the score 4.5. Then the score is incorrect considering a 7.9 and a 8.75 by two other big games journalism sites.
He's entitled to his opionion. And doesn't have to like the game. But he should not give it an incorrect score. A 4.5 means completely unplayable like someone said. If he feels it is not in the style he likes, fine. But he has to give a review that reflects the fact that many would like the game and not think it is completely awful. As seen from scores from IGN of 7.9 and 8.75 from Gameinformer. This is poetic license gone mad. He doesn't have the right to bash the game to this extent. When it simply is not that bad. No matter how frustrating the direction it has taken is for him.
WhataName2's comments