@jpnelson82 You're absolutely right, as an infallible member of a given ideology I should reject any form of artistic interpretation on the premise of a banal, redundant scope that could in no way shape or form qualify or offer anything new to my opinions. Hmm, sounds rather shortsighted, no? I understand that you think the themes are too loud and pervasive without constructive justification, but that type of approach is just arrogant and dogmatic and it serves nothing more than to pointlessly deconstruct a game that may very well be able to stand alone on its merits of game play. I do agree that this review doesn't exactly elaborate on those merits because it slightly focuses on the game's "vision," but try not kill your own possible enjoyment with antagonistic pretenses; from what I've seen, this game has a lot of potential.
Ummm, what? That asinine statement is like saying politicians aren't credible enough to create policy because it is a matter of their self interests. Oh wait... perhaps its the very fact that Mr. Yee is a politician that prevents him from understanding how some people aren't actually irrational, self-centered, power-hungry dickheads. He needs to get off his high horse and realize that he can't just project his personal agenda across an opposing audience of thinking citizens and expect us to willfully concede ignorance while he advocates our opinions for us in congress. He is despicable, and, from what this article depicts, he has the rhetorical authority of a grade-school student, if not lower.
Uber-G's comments