[QUOTE="TheDigitalDeity"]

Oh contraire. Earthbound is quite the ish :)

turtlethetaffer

What do you mean? I currently have no way of playing it (not about to buy a WiiU for the sole reason of playing it either) so I'd love if they released it for a handheld.

I meant that it is a great game in fact, that's all. :)

Thanks all for helping me choose.

I ended up being Skyrim Legendary Edition. :)

I'm quite entertained, been playing it like crazy!

My interest in it probably comes from my exploration nature or my Fallout background.

Thanks once again everyone. :)

Enjoy the winter and don't take an arrow to the knee. (Jokes), LOL!!!

I like any interesting game ranging from FPS to Sports games like NFL.

I've played all of the Assassin's Creed games up until Revelations and I'm talking about Bioshock 1. I played Infite and felt a bit, let down in it's length.

But, yeah! Lol I social a lot, but it's the holidayz baby!

...Grab a chair, sit down, call the guys and this do funny ish! ;)

So, I got money to blow. LOL! (:

I want to buy one of the following three games for Xbox 360:

(1) Assassin's Creed 3

(2) Bioshock

(3) Skyrim

Tell me what you think guys, in my case - I JUST CAN'T CHOOSE!

Thanks in advance. (:

Oh contraire. Earthbound is quite the ish :)

I have had my fair share of playing and wishing there were certain RPGs which should have been made, but I say any good RPG is one which sounds good when said, looks good when played and feels good when experienced (mostly).

I don't have much intricate knowledge about RPGs in the past, but those RPGs would have been nice to have been made.

This is just my take on the subject, but if you look at today's digital entertainment and media market - the technologies used as well as the methods of keeping you entertained is very advanced and well done.

Personally I prefer playing games like Gears of War, God of War, Grand Theft Auto and a bit of Call of Duty on the side but the most important factor to me is the aestheticism factor of the game world. So yes, I guess that's where third person would ultimately destroy first person: you get to experience comprehensive and "rich" characters and not just the world.

But market wise, players tend to want to be the character, feel him/her, see what they see. So thus the detail of first person games are greater (just a notch, don't shoot me down now) to make you feel as if you truly are the character. To make it realistically believable that you are seeing what they see.

My final opinion on the subject is that if you look at today's digital entertainment and media market, the era calls for a mixture of the two. Some games make use of both view methods to create an original and compelling experience for the players.

So I say, there isn't really a winner to me, just personal taste.

Some might like a first person view even in games like God of War, where others want a third person view in games like Call of Duty.