T_P_O's forum posts

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

this is one of the worst threads I've ever lurked

gg hokie and moses

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

lol @ this entire thread

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts
[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

[QUOTE="Lief_Ericson"] Funny cause Chelsea is advancing cause of Spain (Torres)Lief_Ericson

They would've still advanced without Torres' goal

They would be 2-2 aggregated score

away goal rule
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

I'm really happy for Chelsea tonight, and if Di Matteo doesn't get the managerial job there, I will be absolutely livid.

Though, really, hats off to both sides, fantastic match.

lol @ terry though, idk what the hell compelled him to do that

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

.fidosim

LOL, I cannot save that one fast enough.

also, unfortunately, last one I've got re: ron paul

just picture the dog as the GOP selectorate or even general electorate

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

just thought this was appropriate

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

You got reading comprhension problems? I said fairness is of no concern, not that it doesn't exist as some niche ideology. moneymatterz
that page isn't about an ideology, it's about the theorizing over equity (read: fairness) in economics; and you very much said it was of no concern in a discussion of economics...so I dunno, something seems off there, doesn't it?

unless you're saying the normative aspects of economics shouldn't be of concern in a thread dealing primarily with the phrase "fair share", in which case I can't agree and that'd be one very weird position to have

also:"Fairness" in economics is only revelevant [sic] in the context of political implications"

well, since economics deals, among other things, with how we distribute goods and services and politics in part deals with how we decide we should be distributing those, that seems fairly relevant to both areas of study

This isn't hard a hard notion: social sciences often overlap.

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

[QUOTE="T_P_O"]

[QUOTE="moneymatterz"]"Fairness" is of no concern in a discussion of economics, so this thread is flawed from the get-go.moneymatterz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equity_(economics)

Wow...congratulations on discovering the most niche economic thought (not that you know what its implications). Still doesn't change the fact that "fairness" is economics is of no concern in a discussion of economics. "Fairness" in economics is only revelevant in the context of political implications.

you know when I am shown to be wrong I just admit it and move on why can't you?
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

"Fairness" is of no concern in a discussion of economics, so this thread is flawed from the get-go.moneymatterz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equity_(economics)

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

98

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

You're literacy is still not at the required level before I actually consider it worthwhile to comment on your points. Vuurk