SpeedsterCards' forum posts

Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

So what TC is saying is PS2 graphics>Xbox 360 graphics? Because last time I checked, 85% of GT5's cars were upscaled PS2 models.

Even some of the tracks were from the PS2.

Tikeio
come on i clearly pointed out not the gt5 standard models
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

Nope Forza does look better its a far more consistant game from a graphics aspect.

GT5 had no excuse for its environments on some tracks notably Le Sarthe, aswell as some areas of Grand valley look really naff and monaco just before the tunnel the water looks like it was ripped right out a PS2 game.

The only thing graphically GT5 has going for it is its Premium models mind you that is offset by the 800 up rezd PS2 models.Its so inconsistant in many ways that it isnt better only thing GT5 has is photomode but even that is fairly limited when your using the full blown photo mode to premium cars and pre set enviros even those have some short comings aswell.

razgriz_101
in other words gt5 has inconsistent track graphics, but the premium models look better than forza 4's cars? so overall forza 4 wins?
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts
i'm not trying to bash or anything, but after watching the forza 4 video review, and have also seen the gt5 video review, it still looks like gt5 has better graphics(not that it is the better game) i remember forza 4 looking so purrdy in older videos, but now it seems to look worse. i can't be too sure though, but it sure does seem so. keep in mind i'm talking about the premium models in gt5, lmao at the standard http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/driving/forza-motorsport-4/video/6338543?tag=topslot;thumb;1
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

Like I said, you should really listen to your own words because you keep describing exactly what you are doing.Do you want further proof that it's my PSN ID?Did you even bother to check that I gave UC2 an 8, and I even praised it while playing it?

you know if you hadn't had that psn id, i would have been 100% spot on lol. i see what you did there. well played. but still i will never believe 100% everything someone online says. and next time be more clear with your initial post before you start letting it get into a feud. geeze
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

actually, if you speed run MGS4 it does only have 3 hours of gameplay, thers a load of videos on youtube where people have done it in under 2 hours like this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvKPH_MgLoc or this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KINDqSnhonk COD games usually take about 4 hours to speed run

that doesn't make any sense, he was using mgs4's cutscene/gameplay ratio as to say uc2 had the same amount of cutscene/gameplay as mgs4's
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts
But you have no point. Yet again, you proved my point about you not reading posts all the way. You still don't understand why I even mentioned MGS4. Why even try to argue if you're not going to read posts?

seriously your arguments had no backup and you know it. the statement you made was completely false. yet even after you show us that ps gamercard which can never be proven is you, it is out of my head why you would even say that in the first place. and if that is really yours, i apologize for saying you haven't played it. but if you have played it, i still cannot see why you would say that.
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts
[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]You know people like you should really think about what they write, and actually read before posting. You just described yourself.I have played UC2, but since you feel so threatened by simple criticism you have to try and put down what I say.trippleC3
how did i know you were going to say that? your tactics are very predictable and quite sad

It is quite sad. And he's already so predictable by now.

read my last post, it's clear he has lost, geeze he never gives up!
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]how did i know you were going to say that? your tactics are very predictable and quite sadChubbyGuy40

-Accuses person of having nothing but empty statements

-Is the presenter of empty statements and has no case

-Doesn't actually defend the game because he can't.

Who's the one with the predictable tactics? Quit trying to sound like you actually know what you're talking about.

dude listen, you just proved my point once again. your last post is clearly trying to portray me in a way i didn't even ask to be. you were the one who asked me! you had no valid point in bashing a game you haven't played. no matter how much you try to make me seem like a person without an argument, your initial post once again proves you have no idea what you are talking about. "3 hours of gameplay" it would have been funny if you were kidding, but wow you tried defending it with "mgs4"(when mgs4 has nothing to do with uc2 or 3). Case closed yet?
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"]you are like a lawyer with no case, you can't have an answer for anything, so you just start relying on "mgs4" and "more cutscenes than gameplay" to prove a game that you clearly haven't played has more cutscenes than gameplay. after your first reply to me, you were in a hole, so now you are doing anything and everything to get out. kind of like what you just did by asking me "what did i twist"ChubbyGuy40

You know people like you should really think about what they write, and actually read before posting. You just described yourself.I have played UC2, but since you feel so threatened by simple criticism you have to try and put down what I say.

how did i know you were going to say that? your tactics are very predictable and quite sad
Avatar image for SpeedsterCards
SpeedsterCards

598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 SpeedsterCards
Member since 2009 • 598 Posts

[QUOTE="SpeedsterCards"][QUOTE="StealthSting"]

What the hell happened with: "I'll let the game do the talking"? I'm 9 minutes in, and, hell, I mean, seriously.

StealthSting

well obviously those gameplay videos put sour tastes in haters mouths. no one told them to watch the videos. yet they watch it and get threatened; so they post on this thread....you know what happens next. my question is, why even post in this thread....

Huh? Lol I'm not making an attack on the game's quality, I'm making an attack on the fact that the guy is as loquacious as they come.

Yes the door is down, yes you have to shoot those guys, yes, yes, yes. Now can I watch you play the demo, without having to hear your voice every 5 seconds?

Sorry for the confusion man, perhaps I should have made my post clearer, but really, calm down. Even if I were making a criticism on Uncharted, it wouldn't kill you, or anyone who's looking forward to playing it.

lol you misread my post, i was merely answering your question