Everything is subjective, but its hard for me to see how anyone could play through the series with a frown. eggdog1234

Because those with experience have played better TPSes and better RPGs.

It's just typical over reaction... people love to cry about it!

V3rciS

This is precisely what happened.

1. Retards get upset over superficial design choices of ME3 (ex. you can have gay relationships, oh the horror!)

2. They launch a crusade on ME3, nitpicking what little they know about the game

3. The ending leaked, the retards go beserk over it.

4. They conclude the game is sucks BASED ON A F*CKING CUTSCENE EVEN BEFORE THE GAME CAME OUT.

They already accepted that a game is bad and they "critiqued" the game with that understanding.  You may ask why they do this.  It's because they lack the experience/mental capacity to break down a game and analyse its mechanics.  That's why the retards focus on aesthetic trivialities, i.e. a f*cking cutscene.

play quack instead.  you wont come back to any cs.

Build your own.  Save money, get better/more reasonable parts, learn a little something about computer parts.  You won't regret it.

Fallout != Fallout 3.  Call Mass Effect 1/2/3 whatever you want, the combat is so utterly rudimentary.

but firmly snapped the the Fallout 3 Disk into 5, neat, equal pieces.Lulekani

lol.

 Linear Corridor Shooter ? Lulekani

The level design is as bare bones as you could possibly make it.  You know when a cutscene will trigger, when a firefight will break out, and how the firefight will play out (enemy positioning/weapon and abilities usage).  It's as simplistic as gets.

Besides the RPG Concept itself is flawed Lulekani

You haven't even played Fallout like I told you to >_>.

so Giving Mass Effect Gearoids actualy saved it alil bit. All it Needs now is Competitive Multiplayer.

Lulekani

Except it lacks the movement, control, enemy and weapon variation of Gears of War.  Atleast it's third person, so we're at a start!

Play System Shock 2.

In Mass Effect, all roads lead to a disappointing ending, unfortunately.

mhofever

Remember guys, a game should be critiqued by it's superficial narrative and most importantly, the ending!

Quake - Narrative is told through text and the ending "cutscene" is only like 20 seconds!  0/10, don't play ever.

They change something that has no bearance on the mechanics of the game.  Being able to choose between different cutscenes isn't gameplay.  Is it different? Only superficially. 

If we're talking about a change in how you interact in the game world, then sure.  A change of a few cutscenes or dialogue at any point (let alone the ending) doesn't contribute to that.  I can watch cutscenes on youtube and get the same "experience".