Slim_Lyrics' comments

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

You can do that or you can patiently wait until it inevitably make it way onto PS+

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Dafuq is Sessler doing on Danny's shirt?

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Slim_Lyrics

Tom said it best, you can complain all you want. all i know is come April i'll be adding 5 more titles to my already massive PS+ collection. PS+ is worth every cent. It's the best value for money and is only topped by maybe the Humble Bundle.

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Slim_Lyrics

I literally just had this conversation in the GT forum for The Final Bosman with a fan confused about why people hate Ground Zeroes so much. To me it sets the same bad precedent that DLC for cheats, weapons, skins and maps have. It's letting devs know that they can get away with selling what use to be free. I don't care if after finishing the main campaign, that can last as little 6 minutes, you can replay it for hour on end ( i did the same for the demo to Jet Lee's Rise to Honor) this was something could easily have been released as a free demo or at least packaged in to another Konami title a la the Tank Mission for Zone of the Enders. This shit is UNACCEPTABLEEE!!!


P.S. These past few weeks have made me really frustrated at being a Gooner.

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Slim_Lyrics

@Gelugon_baat Trust me, most people will be going into this fully aware of that, especially his review of Infamous 2.

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@barrybarryk It's an unnecessary device that doesn't really cater to anyone. Anyone of the games on the OUYA that are non-exclusive are available for a plethora of devices that most people already have. Even at its $100 price point it still doesn't make sense to waste money on it when your smartphone/tablet/console/handheld/PC can play most of those games (and in most cases even better).

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@DigitalDame @arrow2thekneeXD COULD'VE HAVE SWORN IT WAS A -1

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Good old GS mercilessly butchering the hearts of Nintendo fanboys since 1996. I just hope this forum is as entertaining as the one for Donkey Kong:Tropical Freeze

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Two 9 ratings in 1 day, GS is starting to lose it's edge.

Avatar image for Slim_Lyrics
Slim_Lyrics

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Slim_Lyrics

It doesn't really matter if you allow gamers to keep their free games if the free games you provide are significantly inferior to the completions.


What would you prefer, owning 3+ year old games (most of which are of average standing) or gaining access to some of the latest and most critically acclaimed titles as long as you choose to remain a member (or return to your dormant subscription)?


Yes Games for Gold may have an advantage over PS+ when it come to ownership of games, but PS+ has the advantage where it matters the most, the selection of games available.