RedentSC's forum posts

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@biack_goku said:
@ghosts4ever said:

@biack_goku: no it's not. Uncharted is still much better. And I can't stand uncharted either.

The only thing Uncharted 4 does better is the writing and the cinematic stuff. The combat, platforming, and puzzles are all much better in Tomb Raider. 70% of Uncharted 4 is pushing the stick forward to climb while Nate and Sam talk to each other.

This. Most of the platform sections (where you need to monkey bar across a gap for example) you literally cannot lose. Try to, try and miss time you jump from bar to bar, you cannot fail.

This annoyed me to no end with Uncharted :( so much so i refused to play. I game for a challenge, not a movie

Multiplayer was (and still is) fun

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@KBFloYd said:

According to PlayStation LifeStyle, last week PlayStation 4 slim sales rose by 359%. However, that wasn't enough to beat the Xbox One S. Xbox One S sales were 24% higher than the PlayStation 4 slim, and Xbox One S sales only dropped by 16% in the week following its strong debut. That's remarkable retention and the fact that it's the cheapest 4K gaming option right now makes it an attractive package.

http://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2016/10/06/original-ps4-sales-360-uk-xbox-one-s-still-ahead-ps4-slim/#CA4r6dH8OF1AWx4L.99

hahaha thats funny.

neither the PS4 Slim nor the Xbox one S are capable of 4K gaming fella. you got your consoles mixed up :)

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@AdobeArtist: Thanks for the clarification. Now i'm not a steam user anymore, and i don't know this Dev. I'm assuming you are taking the information you are stating here from a different source to the one mentioned here? as i don't see any evidence of what you are saying in the OP?

Again, i am totally open to believing i'm wrong, i just don't see that evidence yet

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

I see this dudes point.

If the people leaving the bad reviews haven't even purchased the game, or are running it in anything other than the prescribed way, i would be mighty annoyed that they are leaving a crappy review... of course you are going to have a poor experience, you haven't listen to the devs in the first place.

Also Harassment of ANYKIND is completely unacceptable, to anyone. I don't care if you are Justin Timberlake or Katie Hopkins, they don't deserve personal attacks... they give it out, the rest of us rise about their crap... its the only way to deal with such awfulness.

Now this situation is even more clear cut than the above! has this dev been abusive to anyone? not that i see. Steam do need to get their act together.

Also people who are having ago about him mentioning the 30%, he isn't complaining about it, he's simply saying he should get value for his money, and i agree

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@primorandomguy said:

@RedentSC: It must be miserable to get upset over someone's opinion every time you disagree with it. And I'm not the only one who said the combat was meh. It definitely isn't broadcast to be a stealth game, but it definitely is. Like I said the rats was a poor design choice. Next time you see someone's opinion that upsets you, keep it to yourself.

It didn't upset me bro, i just see and pointed out the flaws in your argument.

just as more evidence:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dishonored .. Clearly States "stealth" under the Genre.

http://www.pcgamer.com/dishonored-developer-arkane-studios-picks-cryengine-for-upcoming-game/ .. An interview and statement from Arkane in 2013 again, specifically stating "stealth" when the VP is talking about dishonored, I could go hunting for more stuff but maybe you just missed it? its clearly accepted as a stealth game, in fact you are the first person who i've encountered who believed otherwise.

On the subject of keeping it to myself, no that's not going to happen. If you post publicly, expect a public response. If you want people to keep their opinions to themselves, don't post bro.... welcome to the internet ;)

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@jim1174 said:

I remember when the xbox one first came out and lots of people said they were getting a ps4 for the multi plats because it had a little bit better graphics and was a little bit more powerful. Remember all the Sony fan boys posting pictures of multi plat games and showing us how they looked better on ps4 ? Well I cant wait to do that next year.

yup... definitely "rising above" there bro

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@primorandomguy said:

@Thunderdrone: It wasn't fun. Making you use stealth was annoying, and you were pretty much forced to since the combat was poorly implemented. Dry game. Found it a chore to play.

Don't know what game you've been playing but its not Dishonored. It has an amazing Combat system, super tight (tighter than most FP Games). I guess you are more annoyed by the fact there is just one gun (and one crossbow), when combined with the powers you have available makes for a never ending platter of options, yes very dry indeed. This isn't a battlefield game, it was never hyped as an action/shooter. It was always roughly in the same realm as Thief, and you should expect similar gameplay.

That said, each to their own, just try and use a least a half decent argument next time.

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@lordlors said:
@RedentSC said:

@lordlors - Germany isn't the only enemy. Did you even play the Beta? you play as a turk in the beta map (Turks being known as the Ottoman Empire before the end of the first world war). We have been told of combat in the Alps, which was predominantly the Austrian / Hungarian Empire facing off against the Italians.

We know the FIRST DLC is the Harlem Hellfighters (American Perspective there) and Verdun is the second major expansion (French vs the Germans.

Don't worry buddy, its not just from one perspective.

@GoldenElementXL said:

Hopefully campaign spoilers don't leak before release.

I'm buying into 3 shooters this holiday. BF1 isn't one of them. And my guess is despite this "hype," BF1 will be behind Destiny, COD and Titanfall 2 in sales as well. All the YouTube video watching and liking isn't going to save this game.

The Central Powers lost (Kind of) ... which lead directly to world war 2 via national hatred for the Treaty of Versailles.

I know this isn't what you meant but it was too good an opportunity to waste :P

Nah no German perspective there. No Austro-Hungarians either. It's the same old Allied powers are the good guys and rule stuff taken from WW2 and applied to WW1. This is BF and no Specter Ops The Line. There will be no depth to the story. It's going to be all action feel good **** yeah America style. Ottomans? Lol They are the weakest Central Power and just joined the side of the Germanic peoples because of their disdain of Britain in the Middle East. If you want to see what it's like having multiple perspectives for a video game go play Valiant Hearts. It's pretty clear you haven't played the game.

Yeah i have Valiant Hearts and its great (one of the few great ubisoft games of recent memory)

And yes the Ottomans were incredibly weak, Didn't even roll into the war for over a year and got their arse kicked by the British fairly quickly however the point is you are still playing as different sides.

I will agree however the single player looks very Allied biased. but hey who, History is wrote by the victor and all that.

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@lordlors - Germany isn't the only enemy. Did you even play the Beta? you play as a turk in the beta map (Turks being known as the Ottoman Empire before the end of the first world war). We have been told of combat in the Alps, which was predominantly the Austrian / Hungarian Empire facing off against the Italians.

We know the FIRST DLC is the Harlem Hellfighters (American Perspective there) and Verdun is the second major expansion (French vs the Germans.

Don't worry buddy, its not just from one perspective.

@GoldenElementXL said:

Hopefully campaign spoilers don't leak before release.

I'm buying into 3 shooters this holiday. BF1 isn't one of them. And my guess is despite this "hype," BF1 will be behind Destiny, COD and Titanfall 2 in sales as well. All the YouTube video watching and liking isn't going to save this game.

The Central Powers lost (Kind of) ... which lead directly to world war 2 via national hatred for the Treaty of Versailles.

I know this isn't what you meant but it was too good an opportunity to waste :P

Avatar image for RedentSC
RedentSC

1243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RedentSC
Member since 2013 • 1243 Posts

@Jag85 said:
@bmanva said:
@RedentSC said:

People in the US realise he is a Neo Nazi right? he literally is the hitler of the 21st century and i cannot believe he is in the position he is, capitalism gone mad.

Uhg, hyperbole like this is just as bad as the ridiculous claim that Obama is an arab by the extreme right. Yes, Trump appeal to some pretty sh1tty people but it's not reflective of who he is and will be as president. Granted I'm not saying he wouldn't be a bad president but that has more to do with him being a self serving egomaniacal prick than a true believer of nazism.

It makes no difference what he actually believes, but what's clear is that he is catering towards the Fascist/Nazi/KKK demographic.

Exactly mate. I wish more people would realise this before slamming and refusing to read any further as soon as they see "hitler" in the post. its just pathetic