PwnageUK1989's forum posts

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

im not really bothered about battery life, i just want the most bang for my buck that i can get for 650-700 pounds! im a student so unfortunately i dont have a grand to blow on a laptop

also could anyone please explain what is better processor wise? because i see some with like 1.6ghz and 2mb cache which are more expenseive than those with 2.0ghz and 1mb cache etc.

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts
unfortunately i kind of need this laptop for uni work as well and im not going to lug a desktop and a laptop to uni so a decent enough laptop is enough for me. The sort of games i play tend to be older anyway, i still enjoy myself on things like civ 3 etc, but i want to be able to play dragon age origions on at least medium settings and maybe online with games like cod etc. could tell me if this laptop would be ok gaming wise? VAIO CW Series CW1S1E/R Laptop, 14", Intel Centrino 2 Core 2 Duo P7450 2.13GHz, 4GB RAM, DDR2 SDRAM, 320GB HDD with Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium- Red Graphics Controller Model GeForce GT 230M
Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

hey my laptop has just died and im on the hunt for a new one, but im not sure which laptop would be the most optimised for gaming because im not that technical! ive found a good website which tells me which graphics cards are any good and such, but processor wise im in the dark!

in the shop the processess seem to be laid out thus:

Processor name (usually something duo), 2.0ghz, 800mhz followed by either 1/2/3 mb cache

i only have a budget of around 650 pounds which should get me a fairly respectable laptop, but quadcore is out of my range.

the prices vary though, and im not certain which is better? say 2.0ghz with 1mb cache or 1.4ghz with 3mb cache etc

any help much appreciated

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

hey my laptop has just died and im on the hunt for a new one, but im not sure which laptop would be the most optimised for gaming because im not that technical! ive found a good website which tells me which graphics cards are any good and such, but processor wise im in the dark!

in the shop the processess seem to be laid out thus:

Processor name (usually something duo), 2.0ghz, 800mhz followed by either 1/2/3 mb cache

i only have a budget of around 650 pounds which should get me a fairly respectable laptop, but quadcore is out of my range.

the prices vary though, and im not certain which is better? say 2.0ghz with 1mb cache or 1.4ghz with 3mb cache etc

any help much appreciated :D

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

Having just played fallouts 1 and 2 and played the hell out of oblivion (which i think was fun but could have been so much more), i have arrived at the conclusion that it it will still be a mint game, barring a couple of flaws which bethesda seems to propegate through both oblivion and fallout 3.

Basically my biggest gripe is level scaling, i dont know about everyone else but i sort of like just having all difficulty of creatures and items accessable at all times rather than only when im at a high level. In fallout 1 and 2 (which i recently bought :D) you could go and get your head blown off by supermutants up at the military base at level 1 if you so wished or build yourself up slowly. You also became pretty damn good against the weaker things when you levelled up. Oblivion wasnt so fun because you didnt see the cool enemies until you were a high level, and then the good items became easy to find as well. I would prefer really rare items you had to work for by like blasting your way through a supermutant lair or some such, rather than levelling items whereby power armor is in every chest come level 10. I like the delicious sense of fear you get off sneaking into a high level area with a crap character thinking, "oh crap what is going to kill me around this corner?" or "what cool items can i hopefully make it out of here alive with" and then running like hell from some super powerful nasty...

next the removal of some of the adult content is a tad depressing (not talking about kiddy murders because we never had them in europe anyway) but you do get the feeling that it was a more fun game when fallout was no holds barred gritty machoism with some added humor (yes groin shots lol :D. You get the feeling bethesda is more of a company to play on the safe side when it comes to taboo material (lets face it fallouts 1 and 2 were deliciously sordid :D)

erm finally the whole thing their doing with stats is a tad depressing, because i took great delight in doing different things with stats and playing completely differently, from the retarded behemoth who could only reply with grawp, to a erudite diplomat who could talk his way out of anything but couldnt fight his way out of a paper bag. The idea that dialoigue isnt gonna be affected by stats removes some of the RP value in my eyes.

these are basically my only gripes with fallout because they are not as fun as they could be in my eyes (note im not so bothered about the canon which is being slightly rewritten and such, and the new guns and FP perspective because its a new company so they should put their mark on it, but most of my gripes were present in oblivion as well, which i beleive detracted from the expereince) its obviously not going to be a bad game (indeed it will be a total giggle!), but it could be soooooo much better if they changed a few tiny things and stuck a tad more closely to some aspects of the origionals...

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

To be fair if the overratedness of GTA IV can get a 10 then gears can. Never been so disapointed in my life, GTA was boring and all my mates agree with me. Havnt played Metal gear, so cant comment. However i would say that GTA is suffering from the halo effect (ie hype induced high scores), because i didnt blieve that san andreas was as good as vice city, same as halo 2 wasnt as good as halo...

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

It's great but not all its cracked up to be. I'm not saying what Crysis does isn't great, it is, its just that being able to shoot down trees and go anywhere isn't exactly worth the price of admission. MisterShak

wow its lykthe hate for another shooter i knowall over again. just replace the word crisis with halo and wowzeers!!! isnt that famililiar??

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

[QUOTE="0rin"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="0rin"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]AS long as it keeps the sense of humor it has had in the past I will be happy. Eltroz


I really, REALLY dislike you, and your total lemming ways. But...

Dude grow up. I mean really do you think I care at all what you think of me?



Yeah, Or... we could focus on the fact that I agreed with you ... and leave it at that? Apparently you do care somewhat, due to the fact you responded to only that, and not the positive part.

So anyway, yeah... GOTC. anyone agree?

Naw your just a little kid and wanted to insult before agreeing. Kinda sad on your part that you REALLY do not like someone on a game forum because I could care less about you. I am just responding to your sad insults.So enjoy the hate.

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!!! MY BETS ON WILLY WONKEY!!!!!

Avatar image for PwnageUK1989
PwnageUK1989

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 PwnageUK1989
Member since 2006 • 140 Posts

i can see where your comin from matey!! the nintendo fanboys do appear to be the most overly zealous in proclaiming "TEH BESTEST GAMEZZZZZ EVA" most of which came out in lyk 1867 (forgive the hyperbole). I think nintendo love (as proved by nes guy previously) is like a wierd form of nostalgia, sorta lyk how our parents still love the likes of (name X golden oldie band here) whereas we are into the more modern (and prettier) stuff. At the end of the day i would prefer a great game with great graphics, to a great game with alright graphics. and iv said it before and ill say it again mature themes are ususally more interesting. Most older people prefer 15 movies (blood an boobs) to a PG. (unless said PG has SOMETHING there for adult tastes)

but meh ill probz be flamed but this is my opinion at the end of the day (and aparantly we all have a right to one :D:D:D:D:D:D)