@may967873:

You called a Jewish Supreme Court Justice "whack job" - that makes you an anti-semite according to your logic. And I don't believe that you didn't know that someone with the last name "Ginsburg" wasn't Jewish. Nice try, anti-semitic liar.

Fail.

Also, you didn't provide any examples of "bad stuff" done by Ginsburg,

Thomas being BLACK does NOT make him immune from criticism. As a black man, he is supposed to be a LOT more attuned with the plight of African Americans in this country.

Grow a brain that can count to one.

@may967873:

Yeah, of course, you didn't know that someone with the last name "Ginsburg" wasn't Jewish. Nice try, anti-semitic liar.

Thomas being BLACK does NOT make him immune from criticism. As a black man, he is supposed to be a LOT more attuned with the plight of African Americans in this country.

@Pariah-:

Still not a single counter-argument, eh? I wrote close to 2400 words that give a general idea of what kind of a person Scalia was. You wrote a couple of BS sentences.

Fail.

Grow a brain that can count to one, Adolf Hitler.

@thack57:

TL:DR

Grow a brain that can count to one.

And learn some punctuation.

@may967873:

You called a Jewish Supreme Court Justice "whack job" - that makes you an anti-semite according to your logic.

Fail.

Also, you didn't provide any examples of "bad stuff" done by Ginsburg,

Grow a brain that can count to one.

@thack57:

"You sir,"

You didn't put a comma in front of "sir". Learn some punctuation, you imbecile. Oh, and I don't need imbeciles defending me, I can defend myself just fine against inbreds who can't put two words together.

Go play with your mom's weenie.

@may967873:

So you talk smack about Sanders and Ginsburg?
Wow, your anti-semitism is glowing.

@Richardthe3rd:

"your point being?"

He didn't understand the basic ABCs of life.

Most of his decisions were just an angry tirade and a reflection of his bullshit attitudes.

"The fact remains that he was likely far, far smarter about constitutional law than nearly anyone else on the planet."

--Wrong. On January 4, 2016 Scalia said that the Constitution does not prohibit the government from preferring religion over secularism. Apparently, he did not read the First Amendment that says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. These are the BASIC things that a constitutional justice MUST know.

This is what he said about atheists:

• With respect to public acknowledgement of religious belief, it is entirely clear from our nation’s historical practices that the Establishment Clause permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities, just as it permits the disregard of devout atheists.

As if atheism was comparable to theism or polytheism.

@may967873:

I am not a "reaching buddy".

Learn some punctuation.

You have attacked Ginsburg, so you must be an anti-semite.

Yes, I HATE Thomas and plenty of African-Americans do too.

@balrogbane:

Didn't you say good-bye already? Oh, you felt compelled to reply again? Don't you have free will or something? You said good-bye three times now.

Just because something is "totally subjective" does not mean that "something" is TOTALLY wrong.

Ruling in favor of corporations was OBJECTIVELY WRONG because that led to LEGALIZED bribery. It is NOT subjective to say that 2+2=4, because it is an OBJECTIVE truth.

Fail