This is for all of the ignorance(if you don't know the actual definition of ignorance, it's not an offensive word. It means lack of knowledge, or lack of desire to achieve knowledge of a certain topic).
First of all, you have to look at all the new characters, such as Pit, Metaknight, Wario, Sonic, Snake etc that were announced a long long time ago. You simply have seen them on the Smash Bros page for so long, that they don't "seem like new" to you anymore, and therefore your brain only focuses on the incoming. Until you have personally played with the characters that were not in melee . . . they remain new, and there is no argument to it. As for crying about "clones", allow me to give you a definition:
Clone(klōn): A cell, group of cells, or organism that is descended from and genetically identical to a single common ancestor, such as a bacterial colony whose members arose from a single original cell. (Bacteria replicate asexually, meaning they are clonal, if you didn't know).
Key point being "genetically identical". If you remember from melee, Fox/Falco were NOT clones, they a) don't look the same, and b) do NOT have the SAME moveset . . . a blaster that stuns, vs a rapid fire blaster is much different.
Therefore until, and I repeat until you play each of the three said "clones"(which I have just proven - with a nice little definition - are not actually clones), you shouldn't complain. Besides, for a true Smash Bros player, even the slightest alteration in a moveset can make the BIGGEST difference, and ENTIRELY change the approach of the character.
Appreciate.
Log in to comment