@AzatiS Diablo 3 isn't meant to be played for years and years. I got a little under four months out of it after it released for PC, and felt I had gotten more than my $60 out of it. When I got bored I moved on to a new game.
@mountainexplore @Ayato_Kamina_1 @DonRoosevelt @billlabowski Forbes was wrong, which is why we haven't seen MS (or Sony for that matter) showing off their shiny new console at 4k. These next-gen consoles don't have the hardware required for that resolution, it is only achievable now by very high-end PCs.
@smoke1125 they played better on Xbox 360 because PS3 had that ridiculous cell processor that gave developers a hard time. This time around the architecture is very similar, so there won't be any difference on multi-plat games. Also, MS is still going to be charging $5/month for online, which is a huge rip-off.
I buy it every year because I know I'll end up getting ~1500 hours of gameplay out of it. True, some innovation would be nice, but how do you innovate a game based on a sport that rarely sees any innovation itself?
Red Bull, and energy drinks in general, always give me the squirts. That extra couple hours of energy boost isn't worth the added toilet time, in my opinion.
@eddieham13 I love the free to play model. Instead of paying $60 for a game that includes features or content I might not care about, I can play for free and pick which additional features I want to buy.
Krewton's comments