Sweet, Imma buy this xbox 1 xbox 1 ultra xbox 1 mega xbox ultra mega v2 and then I need a Ps4 a Ps4 elite mega ultra super and then I can play all the games I would love to play at a fraction of the price of a Pc....except twice the price....or more...
Why do reviewers not review every patches every game adds? Because it would be ridiculous. Why do they review new NHL games? They ARE a patch each year. And IF you are going to review a PATCH, then why not review it as such....including only whats new and THE VALUE.
If someone advertised that oh...Dead Cells is adding a patch this month...and you can pay $80 for it...im sure people would be outraged....but hey...if you put a new cover on it and publish it as a whole new game...its alright!
@skudruckus21: if the guy knew hockey, he wouldnt have scored this a 9. if he knew games, he wouldnt have scored this a 9. not sure why this person is reviewing sports_games
@consolehaven: hockey fans??? haha. Anyone who knows ANY hockey would see this game for the trash it is. All offense cheese no defense no real playmaking just a glitchfest of mediocre gameplay. The guy who gave a 9 to this doesnt know hockey...or games.
Im confused. I thought EA cut funding to buy scores from reviewers when I saw the almost realistic 6/10 from IGN...but then I see this ridiculous score here and cant take it seriously. This game is at most a 4/10....its awful representation of hockey its also a scam in that its a PATCH (Not even an expansion) that you are charged AAA title price for each year. Stop giving them good ratings and encouraging this scummy practice.
I think if she were a man there would be more outrage in the comments here, it’s all unfair, rather than "it’s all on her."
if she was a man, she wouldnt have got the job to begin with. There is probably more sexism towards men than women. But hey, keep on playing the victim card despite being wrong.
Kezzy123's comments