Kamekazi_69's forum posts

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] - First, you don't have to give up any freedom or rights, stop being so naive - Second, if you really want a reason, go talk to the family that have lost people due those mass massacres and people able to get their hands on gun like they do milk. Stop being so selfish.FelipeInside

Um, how is banning guns not giving up my freedom/rights?

How is wanting to keep my freedoms being selfish?  It is terrible that those families lost someone, but that doesn't mean you take away rights from everyone.  Tragedies happen.  Or do we want to do this everytime there's a massacre or tragedy where people die? 

So you prefer a system where guns are freely available and mass massacres keep on happening? against a system where they haven't had a mass massacre in 18 years? I call that selfish. Ok then.

Forcing legislation to rule over whether it be the minority or the majority for your personal convenience is selfish in its own nature you know.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

Um, how is banning guns not giving up my freedom/rights?

How is wanting to keep my freedoms being selfish?  It is terrible that those families lost someone, but that doesn't mean you take away rights from everyone.  Tragedies happen.  Or do we want to do this everytime there's a massacre or tragedy where people die? 

lostrib

So you prefer a system where guns are freely available and mass massacres keep on happening? against a system where they haven't had a mass massacre in 18 years? I call that selfish. Ok then.

So you want to take away our freedoms for the possibility we might stop violence? no thanks. I'll keep my rights.  You don't seem to understand that in America, the right to bear arms is equal to the right to free speech or religion or a fair trial.

Plus the president nor does congress have the legal right to impose nationwide restriction. But apparently if you defy, oppose, or disobey any legislation against guns it obviously means you support mass killings.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
This is good news for those who care about individual rights and care about the constitution.Laihendi
Thats how I feel. I just want to be left alone. You speak reasonable sir.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]I'll await the republican led solution then.Wasdie

There's your problem. There is no solution. 

It's just not that easy. I wish it could be. I wish there was some magic legislation we can pass and make the problem go away. We just can't do that.

What we need is a serious change in our society. School shootings and the like are a very recent occurance despite now 200 years of legal gun ownerships. Sur one would happen from time to time in the past, but now they happen way too often. Something has changed.

I think people on this website need to understand that there are bad people among us. There are sickos who are going to kill for the sake of killing whether they're indulged in a psychopathic fantasy of mass murder or snap in an act of rage. There is no magic button, or law that can change that. Some mass murderers are really hard to identified prematurely, and to blindly force legislation on a federal level based on blind emotional outcry is dangerous. People have elected dictators out of emotional fear before. the true monsters that murder millions yet the burden needs to be forced on gun owners that have nothing to do with it. Federal Government has no right or domain on the lives of others within the constraints of the constitution. If it needs to be addressed on a state level fine. You can't tell the government when to or not to get into the lives of others at your convenience. Thats not right. You want them out of your bedrooms, then leave them out of my gun storage.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

Great news.

I just hope this forceful debate stops already.

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

[QUOTE="Abbeten"]Oops!-Sun_Tzu-

Oops indeed, but I realized it was a .gov site :roll:

And that proves what exactly?

Stop ignoring my post and only picking out certain sentences then I'll answer your question
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="Abbeten"] Thank You.Abbeten
heh someone didn't read beyond the title

Oops!

Oops indeed, but I realized it was a .gov site :roll:

Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

Just gonna leave this here

Abbeten
Thank You.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]

feminism is a poison to society just like any form of ethnic, or gender egoistical pride.

-Sun_Tzu-

lol

I know I'm glad we agree feminism is laughable.
Avatar image for Kamekazi_69
Kamekazi_69

4704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kamekazi_69
Member since 2006 • 4704 Posts

He brings up a great point. If women earn lesss then men, why on earth don't employers employ only women in the work force? Aren't women more expenisve to insure? Plus doesn't the average male work overtime then the average female? and don't men in general work in a field exposed to more hazard, and more risk? Women want different jobs, men may only want money. 

This isn't an anti-women thread, this should be an anti-feminist thread because feminism is a poison to society just like any form of ethnic, or gender egoistical pride.