I'll also add in that my PC is practically a $600 gaming PC. E8400, a 9800GTX, a 160GB HD, and 2 GB of RAM with a borrowed copy of Windows is pretty much what a $600 PC would be today. My console setup consists of a 42" 1080P Panasonic (from the highly rated G10 series) and a surround sound setup which I built costing me around $1,300. I've got at least 40 games spread out in between my PS3/360. But when it comes to down gaming with friends, you'll find me playing on my PC. I play Starcraft almost daily - a game from 1999 (or 1998?). Still seems consoles don't really have any multiplayer games that can match up to Starcraft, a game that's older than a decade. It's really not hard to see why PC Gaming is just more satisfying for some people. Consoles really fail to provide that engaging online experience. It probably doesn't help too that the 360/PS3 are so slow. It would take me probably 5 minutes to get into a multiplayer match of Uncharted 2 if I left to it after hitting "submit". On the flip side, if I wanted to get into a game of Counter-Strike: Source, it would take me not much longer than 20 seconds. Console players whine about the PC being difficult to use, but if you've played PC Games for longer than a few years, you'll see that PC Gaming features unmatched convenience and functionality. KHAndAnime
starcraft? id take Halo 3 over that with multiplayer and the numbers prove more gamers playing Halo 3 than starcraft as well
Log in to comment