So God knew that we were going to screw up when He made us, your right. So should he have not given us free will? God doesn't live in this world, so he is not part of our 'time', he is not anchored to his knowlege of our future on Earth. In the next paragraph your puting yourself in God's shoes - assuming that you can rationalize the train of though of a Being that created everything, and knows everything that has, and was gone on. After that you say religion should be done away with: heres you logic: Since: God doesn't exist, and was though up by man. Therefore: religion must be done away with ... and you are ABSOLUTLY right! If God doesn't exist then religion is a bunch of silly fantasys. But your arguments against God's existance aren't very convincing. The first part of your post is an unsucessful atempt at refuting God, and the second part depends on the idea that God is a lie.alphamale1989This is really a sweet attempt at trying to correct me, it really is, but it's obvious to me you just haven't thought this through long enough. You say that God is not anchored to his knowledge of our future on Earth, but if he is all-knowing, then yes he would be, he wouldn't even have a choice. He will know. Of course God would live in our world if he is truly omnipresent, because he would live in all worlds simultaneously! After that, you say that I'm trying to rationalize a being that created everything, but what did you just do in the sentence before that? You did the same thing. In fact all believers do the same thing. Trying to describe God as best they can, without realizing that it's just the way they would want God to be. It comes down to wishful thinking. You have no proof for anything you are saying about God. So, you couldn't possibly approach me with a "I'm here to correct you" attitude. You just can't do that, logically. If you had proof, you could approach me like that, but you don't, so it's nothing more than your opinion against mine. But you got your opinion from doctrine, and sorry to tell you, but that doesn't hold much ground. If you ask why, well, that's because it's something you came across one way or another, and adopted it, rather than something you formulated on your own. On top of that, the doctrine you adopted hasn't ever been verified as being accurate, at any point in time. And I'm only rationalizing it as far as a human mind can, or at least as far as my mind can, and what could be wrong with that?
I_Am_Rage's forum posts
Log in to comment