MJ was never found to have done anything to any kids. He was never found guilty of anything, there were inconsistencies with the testimony and evidence against him and even after they raided his house, they never found anything incriminating.
If you are a person of logic and reason and have any knowledge at all to the cases/allegations against MJ, then you would come to the same conclusion. If you simply have your own opinion/view of MJ despite the facts, then as un-credible as it is, nothing will apparently change your mind.
- retouched all textures and improved the rendering engine - bug fixes and balance tweaks to the gameplay - FOV slider and ultra-wide support - improved framerates on console (possibly just Xbox One X and PS4 Pro) - new DLC, the Fatesworn, that will release next year
So offering players an OPTIONAL service that allows them to play as many games as they want, from a library with hundreds of games, including first party new releases on day one, with no commitment to buy any of them, is why xbox gold sucks? Okay...
IF MS is smart, they should price the SX at $400 or lower to undercut Sony. MS can make up the loss in price through their subscriptions, like Game Pass. But even if they didn't make up the loss, they have enough capital to afford to take the hit and get the SX in as many homes as possible.
"Respectfully, I don't agree with you. Every PC gamer will benefit more from having Playstation over Xbox."
- I'm a PC gamer. Been playing PC games for around 25 years and building PC's for about as long, and I get no benefit from owning a Playstation as it offers nothing I want.
"PC/PS combination will provide access to more games, than having PC and Xbox."
- but more isn't always better... What you say only applies if someone is actually interested in the games Playstation offers. In addition, looking at raw numbers in terms of X consoles offers Y amount of games, is such a rudimentary way to look at it, as playing games on console and PC can offer different experiences, even if you are playing the same games. I own several of the same games on Steam and Xbox, because each platform offers a different ecosystem and experience.
There are many people like myself, who don't have friends that game on both PC and console or at least not their console, so for people like me to play games with my friends, I have to play games where my friends are, which is xbox, which further shows why owning a PS is useless for me.
"I work in IT company and every gamer (that I am aware of) has PC. Back in X360/PS3 days, there was roughly 50:50 division between X360 and PS3. With current generation, I am not aware of a single X1 in our environment. Every console we have among us is PS4."
- what exactly is your point in sharing this anecdote? Why do you mention that you work in IT? Is it an attempt to somehow make your personal experience/opinion seem more valid? What is the relevance? And why would/should other people care what the console of choice is for every gamer you are aware of (whatever number that is...)? You are making an objective claim - that every PC gamer will benefit more from having Playstation over Xbox. - yet thus far, have used nothing but subjectivity to "prove" your point.
This isn't a black and white argument and it seems so many people want to treat like like it is. There are several variables outside of simply "what will offer me the largest number of different games to play," as to why people choose one platform over another or in this case, choose one platform over another in addition to their PC.
"If graphical improvement is not what defines next gen, then they REALLY better focus on games more than ever!"
- but games isn't necessarily what defines next gen either... Games is a standard of the medium, not a defining feature of any particular generation. Going by what's we've seen thus far, I'd say the defining feature of next gen is focusing on and improving upon the aspects that make playing games more enjoyable, like faster load times, higher frames and more accessibility. Game Pass, xCloud, backwards compatibility and SMART delivery are addressing these issues, while the hardware itself addresses the rest.
@skyhighgam3r: "I can't even rely on my Xbox One X to give me 1080p @60fps in my games."
- that issue has more to do with what decisions the devs make with their games than with the capabilities of the console. MS doesn't mandate devs what resolution and framerate their games MUST run at, so if they choose 30fps when the console is capable of 60, that's on them.
"If all games were hitting a minimum 60fps and going up to 120 there would be an outcry how the new games look just like current gen games do."
- but would there be? the next-gen consoles should easily be able to hit 2k/60 pretty consistently, and if you go down to 1080p, they can incorporate super high res textures, more post processing effects and farther draw distances. Those are 2 options that hit 60fps, that would look better than current games do.
The problem seems to be that 2K resolution has been forgotten about. the console market seems to on the mindset of always tying to hit 4K.
H0RSE's comments