GamespotdlBMN's forum posts

  • 18 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"][QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="hongkingkong"][QUOTE="ONLYDOD"][QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

[QUOTE="Fart_Storm"]No, if you knew anything about the Cell, you would know that with its 7 separate SPus, it is capable of graphics and physics and AI that have never been done before. Nothing on the 360 can touch anything on the PS3. The PS3 was designed to be future proof, using such innovations as the Cell processor, blu ray, firmware updates, and teh EDGE development tools. I think that you meant to say in your thread title "Why the XBOX 360 has already LOST the war."hongkingkong

The original XBOX was future proof too.

The PS3 is the better machine, but the user interface, online play, and lack of games kills. it. How far is this Cell gonna get you when you have no games crap online?

That is the moment I realised you've never touched a PS3.

I have one in my house and play it, these comments aren't far from the truth.

so what is crap about the ps 3 on-line resistance hardly no lag, warhawk the best on-line only game ever made with hardly no lag. cod4 same as the 360 on-line but yet you pay for it. i just don't get it.

Okay. Answer this. On Resistance online, if I'm playing online can I send my PSN friend an invite? Yes or no

Yeah if they are playing the same game. Thats the only way, you can message them and tell them to get into the online mode, otherwise its very much a stupis system.

eeexaactly

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

Reason #2. The 360 has more games, and thats a fact. Pretty self explanatory. HALO, and Gears Of War. Those two games in my opinion are better than anything the PS3 could offer. You can fool yourself into thinkig "HALO is overrated" or "Gears isnt that good" but the fact is, they're amazing.

Reason #4. XBOX LIVE. LIVE is the best thing thats happened to gaming in a while. There are millions of players, EVERYBODY has headsets. I dont know, it feels more active, united, and more exciting than Sony's PSN. On Resistance, I cant iinvite my PSN buddies to a game. I have to make a new friends list just for it. On XBL, EVERY online game is integrated with XBL. Its smooth, and consistent. The PSN may be free but it SUCKS!

Saturos3091



Why? Why do you pass off your opinion as fact? :|

I'm not even going to bother disagreeing with you on points #2 and #4.

well because its a fact that the 360 has more games. go on, disagree. this is a discussion, lets hear what you have to say!

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="GARRYTH"][QUOTE="hongkingkong"][QUOTE="ONLYDOD"][QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

[QUOTE="Fart_Storm"]No, if you knew anything about the Cell, you would know that with its 7 separate SPus, it is capable of graphics and physics and AI that have never been done before. Nothing on the 360 can touch anything on the PS3. The PS3 was designed to be future proof, using such innovations as the Cell processor, blu ray, firmware updates, and teh EDGE development tools. I think that you meant to say in your thread title "Why the XBOX 360 has already LOST the war."hongkingkong

The original XBOX was future proof too.

The PS3 is the better machine, but the user interface, online play, and lack of games kills. it. How far is this Cell gonna get you when you have no games crap online?

That is the moment I realised you've never touched a PS3.

I have one in my house and play it, these comments aren't far from the truth.

so what is crap about the ps 3 on-line resistance hardly no lag, warhawk the best on-line only game ever made with hardly no lag. cod4 same as the 360 on-line but yet you pay for it. i just don't get it.

1) resistance is mediocre compared to PC and 360 's star shooters

2) Warhawk is ok but seriously, best online game ever? Its ok when people work together to capture a base and its pretty epic, but thee are better experiences, surely.

3) If you play online with other humans, you'd probably wish to interact socially with them (otherwise just play SP if you don't want to play with people), on PSN this is impossible. Nobody wears mics, and if they do, they never say anything they just blurt out static noise or breathe down the mic. I tried talking to them but they don't want to speak, they want brains.... BRAAAAAAINS!!!!! Its not a fun social experience unless you have friends also online.

thank you thats what im trying to say. this guy knows what he is talking about

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="hongkingkong"][QUOTE="ONLYDOD"][QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

[QUOTE="Fart_Storm"]No, if you knew anything about the Cell, you would know that with its 7 separate SPus, it is capable of graphics and physics and AI that have never been done before. Nothing on the 360 can touch anything on the PS3. The PS3 was designed to be future proof, using such innovations as the Cell processor, blu ray, firmware updates, and teh EDGE development tools. I think that you meant to say in your thread title "Why the XBOX 360 has already LOST the war."GARRYTH

The original XBOX was future proof too.

The PS3 is the better machine, but the user interface, online play, and lack of games kills. it. How far is this Cell gonna get you when you have no games crap online?

That is the moment I realised you've never touched a PS3.

I have one in my house and play it, these comments aren't far from the truth.

so what is crap about the ps 3 on-line resistance hardly no lag, warhawk the best on-line only game ever made with hardly no lag. cod4 same as the 360 on-line but yet you pay for it. i just don't get it.

Okay. Answer this. On Resistance online, if I'm playing online can I send my PSN friend an invite? Yes or no

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]Because Gears has great replay value and its fun online. I cant say the same for Restitance. On Resistance, once you beat it, you beat it.GARRYTH
um resistance has on-line too. so once you beat just like gears you play on-line. besides warhawk is the game i play. you can't say anything bad about that game. 8.5 for being an on-line game only. if you have ever touch a ps 3 you would now that the ps 3 has great games as well.

I got one for Christmas and traded it for a 360 last month. The ps3 has great games, but nowhere near the level of the 360

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="hongkingkong"][QUOTE="ONLYDOD"][QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

[QUOTE="Fart_Storm"]No, if you knew anything about the Cell, you would know that with its 7 separate SPus, it is capable of graphics and physics and AI that have never been done before. Nothing on the 360 can touch anything on the PS3. The PS3 was designed to be future proof, using such innovations as the Cell processor, blu ray, firmware updates, and teh EDGE development tools. I think that you meant to say in your thread title "Why the XBOX 360 has already LOST the war."GARRYTH

The original XBOX was future proof too.

The PS3 is the better machine, but the user interface, online play, and lack of games kills. it. How far is this Cell gonna get you when you have no games crap online?

That is the moment I realised you've never touched a PS3.

I have one in my house and play it, these comments aren't far from the truth.

so what is crap about the ps 3 on-line resistance hardly no lag, warhawk the best on-line only game ever made with hardly no lag. cod4 same as the 360 on-line but yet you pay for it. i just don't get it.

you have to pay for it because its more players online, and much more features like cross game invites, and in game chatting for example.

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

The Xbox 360 hasn't won anything. The RROD will be the reason they will lose. And Sony has way better games coming the next few years.PS3Gamez

RROD is GONE!!!!! DONE!! FINISHED!! Stop dwelling on that, please!

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="killerfist"][QUOTE="GamespotdlBMN"]

alright, just go home and play Resistance 50 million times. I'll be play Gears on LIVE

Mavrickkal

I'll be happy to

I will be playing Gears on LIVE too.., once my 360 is back from the repaircenter..

the tale of many many 360's from what I hear.....*plays violin*

lying. 360s dont break anymore. The problem is fixed. Although it did suck, I'll admit

Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Because Gears has great replay value and its fun online. I cant say the same for Restitance. On Resistance, once you beat it, you beat it.
Avatar image for GamespotdlBMN
GamespotdlBMN

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GamespotdlBMN
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Yeah I do. Go play on XBOX LIVE for 30 minutes and then tell me that the PS3's online is brilliant. You wont be able to
  • 18 results
  • 1
  • 2