FighterforJC's comments

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By FighterforJC

If Kevin Van Turd does the review for this game, expect no more than 6.5/10. P.O.S. Kevin so desperate to get a date he thinks he can impress women by showing that he only likes difficult games.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By FighterforJC

@Chupacabra3332 Those british still bitter they got their heads handed to him during the revolutionary war. Funny how they rigged the video by using the crappy PC version and even changing the settings even worse.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@stailcookie No, that tells you than Van Turd wanted Aliens to be a certain type of game but he didn't get what he wanted so he cried like a baby.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@JT_Playa That's exactly the point. Van Turd had his mind made up that he wanted the game to be "more survival horror," it was obvious due to how he praised the "stealth section" in Colonial Marines. But his review is as stupid as anyone complaining that Madden doesn't play anything like NBA2K. I love me some pure action, no nonsense, and this is what Colonial Marines provides.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

This is a message from Gamespot/Kevin Van Turd that times have changed. This is a message to the publishers that Gamespot will only accept "Option A" when it comes to the perks they will receive or else they will sabotage the review.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@l2humpie There is no law against an OPINION, which is what reviews are. It'd be one thing if he was testifying in a court of law, but reviews are opinions. It is perfectly legal to be "bribed off" although it comes in many forms and not just a shady, passing a briefcase full of money under the table. Nobody's career is at stake. Gaming websites ar out to make money, they ar not the beacon of truth.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@MVan86 @FighterforJC "Remaining in cover when they don't need to" is a fanboy nitpick. Allied AI has always been a prop in shooters, especially FPS's. Some don't even bother with the facade (Halo) Maybe the guy's still scared and just wants to be sure it's clear? A better criticism would be the fact that you yourself cannot take cover while your teammates can. I hope one day Kevin Van Turd gets the man of his dreams. He's been trying to prove street cred for years.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@penstrol @Kaz32 @FighterforJC It's not "conspiracy" it's just Van Turd's unprofessional, flaming fanboyism.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@USDevilDog @FighterforJC It was actually a compliment.

Avatar image for FighterforJC
FighterforJC

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@MVan86 @FighterforJC Really now. How much worse? In order for the review to be remotely accurate the game's gonna have to completely fall apart and be unplayable.