@Agent3sephiroth Clearly you've never been to Brazil. I just left not too long ago, and there is a lot of amazingly shaped women, not too far changed from what that design has. They weren't wearing as much armor, though.

I eat mushrooms because it sends me to the mushroom kingdom and I can put on my flying hat and stomp goombas (and, after jersey shore, who doesnt hate goombas?)

I'm offended by Duke Nukem, not because of how it portrays women... but how it portrays men. It's disgusting and sexist to think that all men use urinals and gawk over attractive twins and cuss. I'm offended. Not all men are Duke, and Duke is not all men!! It's dissapointing, it truly is. I feel victimized and insulted.

I heard somewhere that if Lara Craft didnt have those massive polygons, she wouldnt have been able to fight a T-Rex...

Does this mean I should stop going to the strip club?

And doesnt FX, also part of the Fox News affiliation, still play Married With Children? That's not sexist and has a lot of message behind it, too.

*Sings "Blame Video Games" to the tune of Blame Canada* Fox News setting the over-reaction bill yet again. Video games arent sexist, Fox News is gamist. And the irony is the fact that this news station with their OMGAD SEXISM IN INTERACTIVE MEDIA stance is clearly forgetting that their affiliate, Fox, plays things like Family Guy. If Duke is sexist, then Quagmire is the antichrist.

Hell, you can find sexism is Disney movies.

@Darkcloud_San I think you overpaid for your PC... If iOS can get TF2 though, then I'll be impressed.

This article is "Obviousness for Dummies." They both have their pros and cons, even as gaming devices. Is the iPod Touch a gaming device? Yes, it is, because you can game on it. Is it going to successfully adapt the types of games that can be played on dedicated gaming devices? No, because of the touch input gives you no tactile feedback or accuracy of something with buttons. Is that an issue? Yes and no. Yes, because first person shooters, fighters, and most other genres suffer without dedicated buttons... No because it creates new genres and game types. They do both offer motion, and thats nice. It is a shame that 3DS doesn't offer multi-touch, though. Unlike Wisdom05 's unwise comment about "what now who needs multitouch" retarded comment, the more ways to input the better, and that even includes multitouch softkeys on the lower screen. Does it NEED it? Not necessarily, it has buttons, but could it gain from it? Yes. Will it ever get it? No, because the 3DS uses antique pressure sensitivity, which is a shame. Capacitive is where it's at (Thank you NGP!!) In the long run, it's all about preference. How avid a gamer are you? Ipod games will rarely get the attention of a game that you'll find on a dedicated machine for gaming, but does that mean you wont get high quality, addictive games with value? Absolutely not. They fill two entirely different niches, and the subniches that they both fill are going to be in different quantity and quality. 3DS is a gaming machine first, everything else second, while iPod is everything else first, gaming second. You get what you buy, just know what you're buying. I had an ipod touch, but I sent it seaworthy (a decision I later regret) in a fit of glitch when I was on deployment, luckily I have an Android. And I do have a 3DS which will most likely be traded up for, what I believe will be, the superior PSP2. Do I have anything against any of the devices? No, they all have their pros and cons. Just don't be a tard and know what you want before you buy it.