Well only one.....I've never played a Zelda game in my whole life which sucks because i own the n64 and loved it including the previous nintendos and now i fill like i missed out on somthing big. Well mabey this is not as big as i thought i mean how bad is it to have never Triedany of the Zeldas.
Damnit all why would they take out the puzzels the puzzles are the back bone to games like that. They really droped the ball on this one, this could have been great. Then again i'm saying it like it's already been played over here in North America and rated and made clear. Just mabey, just Mabey it will be a little better then what they let on.
Well i have a strict rule of not beating games i don't desire to beat. I've beat my fair share of games everyone here has but non of those games i did not notlike. I find it to fustrating to continue to play a "Broken" or bad game, FYI Warrior within.
Wow what's up with that. Just by reading the game's review i thought it was at least and 7.5 to a 8.5, i mean how dull can this combat system really be. Hopfully the guy was just making a big deal out of little or this could be somwhat bad.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh THE IRONY, the irony DAAMMMMNNNNN YOOOOOUUUUUU. Wait why do i care i don't have plans to get a ps3, or do i? Well ether way i think it's going to be a good game because i'm pretty sure that 7.0 is a GOOD.
!. the mutl. in Call of duty 2is not as good as Call of duty 3 as in the way there are no tanks and no "anti tank" or "medics" as you just simply pick a gun and use it in the battles. Soo really it's Debatible and 2. I have to say the single player is quite better then COD 3 as in the quality of it in the end i think is a bit better. 3. If you mean Call of duty 2 (for the 360 and pc) then this is what i'm talking about but if this is not (Big red one) the when i'm talking about then this was all for nothing.
Log in to comment