@alastor529: While I know the Justice League's behind the scenes troubles already (and since I didn't this earlier, may Snyder's daughter rest in peace) , this is still a very comprehensive explanation which I thank you for. Lots more Joker and Harley Quinn love in the future than I imagined.

I did a quick look up of Jason Momoa, since that (as well as WB's campaign for Tom Cruise) is news to me, and there's a slight error. While Momoa was defending sacred Hawaiian land and it is keeping him from Aquaman 2, he was just kidding about a bulldozer running him over.

@zmanbarzel: Oh. Well, that's a shame- JK Simmons was pretty good as Jim Gordon.

Wasn't Commissioner Gordon already being played by J.K. Simmons? Unless this is a prequel, don't tell me he got recast too.

That's nice to hear, Masuda.

...yet you can't patch in the missing Pokemon into Sword and Shield post-release why, exactly?

@MrGeezer: Better Disney listen to the cast banding together for the right reasons than some relatively small online news site that only dug up Gunn's past for their own agenda. Keeping Gunn fired after it's evident he's not the same guy from a decade ago nor any evidence of actually doing what he talked about only empowers Daily Caller to keep pulling this crud. That would be much worse than Disney reversing what was "mob justice", and therefore never really a decision they made themselves, to begin with.

Usually, I'm in support of fan projects. However, this time, I feel Frontwire may have rustled the beehive. And when that beehive is Disney's...I don't see this ending well.

@reduc_ab_, @ojmstr: Because it's not just about the release of a fan project in and in itself- it's about the message and feelings behind why it was created in the first place. And usually, one of those reasons is because the one(s) who created the fanwork wanted to show their love for the franchise, in a way far more proactive than simple reviews and forum discussions. Also, though more of a personal belief, it's to show what the fan creator believes the franchise stands for, or believe it should stand for.

@Barighm: Or Nintendo and Rainfall can work out a deal where Nintendo uses Content ID to monetize the video without removing it.

@kikook Only trademarks have a defend or die clause, and even then, I imagine the wording/spirit of the law would have several workarounds so everyone wins.

@etacet Then what Bethesda should have done was make it public they were defending their trademark, then call off the DMCA, as they proved they cared about their trademark, and there's nothing saying an action has to stick.