Billyhyw's forum posts

Avatar image for Billyhyw
Billyhyw

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Billyhyw
Member since 2007 • 254 Posts
[QUOTE="Billyhyw"]

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="mmogoon"]Great. You're a hermit, therefore Gears loses i get itcobrax25

The best looking console games will always lose graphically to the best looking PC games released around the same time.

You and all the other Hermits couldnt be more wrong. Since we go by Gamespots word as fact around here Gears of War won best graphics technical. But if gamespot isnt good enough why dont you check virtually every other gaming websight. The fact is Gears of War simply destroys Rome Total War visuals and by a fair margin as well. There is no game on pc currently avaiable that holds a candle to Gears which is pretty sad considering the 360 has been out for over a year now. Or should I say pretty impressive on the 360's part.

Rome:Total War came out 3 years ago............... and GEOW has 8 player online, and Tiny maps....Besides its Graphics, its not really to impressive.

I meant Midevil 2 obviously.  Regardless these games have gone head to head on eveyr websight and Gears won check for yourself its a superior looking game.  If they dont look impressive then you must think graphics on games suck now as there are no games out that hold a candle to Gears.

Avatar image for Billyhyw
Billyhyw

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Billyhyw
Member since 2007 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]If where going to do a comparison like this- Dead Rising wins. Many, many characters on screen at once and very next gen graphics -i dont think people relize how good this game looks from a pure texture/lighting/ etc. standpoint. It has very above average graphics. The fact that they can have that many zombies (which are even next egn looking by themselves- highly detailed) and great graphics without any framerate problems at all is very impressive mjarantilla
Dead Rising = 1,000 zombies on screen at once Medieval 2 Total War: 10,000 soldiers on screen at once + cities + burning buildings + crumbling walls + miles and miles of ACTUAL RENDERED terrain Medieval 2 still wins.

Dead Rising has some of the best particle effects arround.  Dont belvie me then smash a few zombies and watch there blood and skull chunks lay splatter on your face and stay there.  Our watch the 1000 of zombies bodies stay there withought disapering.  RTW has nothing on DR much less GeoW.  

Avatar image for Billyhyw
Billyhyw

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Billyhyw
Member since 2007 • 254 Posts

Well artistically gears destroys total war.  But I guess it can be said it is technologically superior.deadesa

No it cant they went head to head and Gears won on every websight in the technical category.  RTW mediocre char models and low res textures are nothing that impressive.  Yes it has tons of units on screen at a time but it pails to the CG quality graphics of Gears every gaming sight agrees.

Avatar image for Billyhyw
Billyhyw

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Billyhyw
Member since 2007 • 254 Posts

[QUOTE="mmogoon"]Great. You're a hermit, therefore Gears loses i get itmjarantilla
The best looking console games will always lose graphically to the best looking PC games released around the same time.

You and all the other Hermits couldnt be more wrong.  Since we go by Gamespots word as fact around here Gears of War won best graphics technical.  But if gamespot isnt good enough why dont you check virtually every other gaming websight.  The fact is Gears of War simply destroys MidEvil 2 Total War visuals and by a fair margin as well.  There is no game on pc currently avaiable that holds a candle to Gears which is pretty sad considering the 360 has been out for over a year now.  Or should I say pretty impressive on the 360's part.