@Bayonetta2013 @BAMM17 Well the way you stated your comment, it "alarms" you that it's almost complete, comes off as you thinking the team spent too little time on it and too many gamers think that these games are rushed out so Ubisoft can make quick money, when in fact the AC team spends a lot of time and effort developing these games. I was just letting you know they in fact spent plenty of time on it, just incase you didn't know.

@dstv But Assassin's Creed doesn't flood the market with the same game, they do it would good games so yes that is fine by me

@Nightrain50 @BAMM17 Yeh this game could've technically worked without the Desmond-modern day perspective but thats something that makes this game very unique and, in my opinion, fun. With it, they successfully tell the Assassin-Templar war from all eras where it is important.

And yes I can honestly say they haven't been making it up as they went, yet. I'm not a fan of this "YOU are the main character" in the animus now crap because what the hell? I wanna play as someone interesting and otherworldly, not myself, thats the point of video games. But as for every other game, it all fits together and I think in very well told story. I'll admit ACIII's modern day was too rushed and crammed together because Ubisoft was trying to end it all in that one game, but if they woulda continued Desmond's saga, then it would've been a great story.

I think the fact that Desmond's lineage is the line of people that inherited some First Civilization traits (Eagle vision, extraordinary dexterity, etc.) from the hybrid humans and became important human figures because of it, is an awesome persona for a main character(s) and fits perfectly in the "reliving memories" part of the game. And because Desmond's story takes place in a similar modern time period to real life, it connects with players which in turn connects players to "relived" Assassin's and their time periods. It's a perfect interactive system that they fucked up by SPOILER

killing Desmond.

@greatryoman This is the best comment I have seen so far out of this clusterfuck of unintelligent BS.

@Daniel Brown I mean obviously they do if they're made it all the way to 6 major releases and still going strong

@Nightrain50 If they went with that approach their would be no story, or it would just be a very short franchise because there would be nothing connecting the time periods, you wouldn't be able to experience different parts of the world in different times and that's something that I and a lot of other people really love about AC. And fortunately, because of that they won't drop the time travel, memory humping bs.

@Bayonetta2013 As always there's someone who didn't do their research. Huh...this game has been in development for around 2 years now, still has like 5 months to go, blah blah blah. When a game is made by a company as big as Ubisoft, they don't have to wait till the end of one game to start development on a new one. I just feel really bad for Ubisoft's AC teams right now cause awesome games like ACIII get trashed by "fans" and they have throw all that hard work away. I just hope they bring Connor back sometime.