-JMD-'s comments

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If its anything like the demo, i will like this game. A 8/10 seem a good mark for a new IP.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Played for 60 min, got a little disappointed. The next day decided to give it another shot. It has its faults, but still a interesting game. Dont expect it to be a ghost of tsushima, but its still a ok samurai themed game. A good game if you have a few minutes to burn, and want nothing time consuming. But i still feel that, this game could be a gem but it fails in a few places! Mainly the combat. It doesn't feel satisfying at all.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

We are getting worst games every year, more unfinished games, more games as a service type of "games", more micro-transaction in games... And they are making more money than movies and sports. So they will make games more expensive because, as the other guy said, they dont want some money they want all the money.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I will say this again...

If this was another call of duty game with no solo play, only multiplayer and full of microstransactions and game passes trying to milk the players, it would be a 8 kind of game. It's weird that these "critics" give a 8 to a game as a service full with microtransactions, and a 5 to this game. Hell, Assassins creed Odyssey received a 8, and its full of bullshit like selling boost XP and stuff! I think that the videogame journalists are doing a terrible work in the videogame industry lately.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

If this was another call of duty game, with no solo play, only multiplayer and full with microtransanctions it would get at least a 8. Because activision is very "generous". But since Sony dont have to pay for reviews, these kind of games is tanked.

The videogame industry is going to the gutter. They just want life service games full with microtransactions.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

This game has such a immersive storytelling, i cant just stop playing the tutorial! 12 out of 10. Top game!

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

What a great year to Nintendo Switch and PS4.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Well, i guess its a 9 because he wants it to be a 9... The score is a bit inflated by the nostalgia factor of the reviewer.

Avatar image for -JMD-
-JMD-

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@seshjonathan: I guess i hit a nerve somewhere with you... But i just cant figure out what... The reason i compared the two games is obvious,. Both have similar things about sexualizing woman, but in one game they dont care, and in the other is a crime offence, when in my opinion, it's a point that just don't matter in a game. Its irrelevant. The game is crappy, but not because of that!

Not sure if you are a troll, or you really don't know better..