I dont understand why everyone loves CoD4 so much. Is it a great game? Yes. Does it make great progress as a shooter? Yes. Is it that fun to play? It can be. But CoD4 does not take hardly any skill at all to play. When you only need to hit someone with 3 bullets to drop them, its gets old really fast. The game is about 75% luck, can you see the enemy before they see you? and about 25% skill, aiming and some strategy is involved with the Perks. I just get sick of the game quickly though, same thing over and over again.
I would have to say that Battlefield: Bad Company is one of the best shooters I have played. It is the best in the Battlefield series, and a lot of fun to play. I think of it as an inbetween from Halo 3 and CoD4. Halo it requires almost an entire clip to take someone out (if your using an assualt or battle rifle), and that can get annoying having to fire a swarm of bullets to kill someone. Bad Company requires about 8-10 bullets depending on the weapon, which makes it much more fun, just enough to give the opponent a chance to fire back, but not too much to the point where you are having to fire an entire magazine. CoD4, too quick of deaths, Halo 3 - takes too much to kill, and B:BC, just right. Not to mention that BC's vehicles are very balanced, and the classes are all balanced as well. My major beef with BC is that it has a limited number of maps. We need more small maps for the game, especially on conquest. Most of the maps on conquest are huge vechicle-only based maps that are not very fun to play in my opinion. But all 3 of the above games are amazing in their own aspect, I just prefer BC over the other two.
Thats my two-bits.
Log in to comment