HALO WARs aint what people thought....

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad. and i knew it would. it drove me nuts when i saw that thread saying it would change the rts genre yeah right. if anything this game short of its cool cutscenes embarassed the genre and didnt do anything new AT ALL. the rmie sizes were so low and the flood wasnt able to be used and u couldnt even play as the covenant second time through. In my opinion i thought this game was horrible...Just like halo 3 and 2

are you kidding, the demo left me more shocked then i could belive. i was like no way can this game be done and done good...but damn it was i wrong

sure its not as serious as pc rts's but its amazing

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad um hellooo this website hasnt done a good review for about 3 years. every where else got a 8.5 or higher.noxboxlive

i disagree i think they do great reviews at gamespot. and further besides the control scheme was has been done better in the game. small armie sizes or was it the short campaign. and other sites are just hyping up a game that obviously didnt do any better than say red alert. And i think red alert was way better than this game. this game had smoth action and graphics but nothing more

this game is an RTS for the mainstream human of today. we want to go in, blow stuff up, and go on and live our life once we're done. Some how PC gamers have something stuck up their collective ass that dismisses anything that doesn't require multiple flo-charts and an encyclopedia to play. This is what halo did for the FPS, and this is what halo wars attempted to do.

The PC gaming cult has this truly retarded idea that every game should be complicated, deep, and time consuming, And that they should only pay 50 dollars for an infinite amount of game content, despite the growing difficulty to make a high graphics game today....

Even David portreus, or Norman Shwartzkopf would see the insane micromanaging tha gos on inside your snobby PC gamers RTSs would be asinine when in truth all that need to be done is Deploy, Move, Kill,

Halo Wars= Deploy Move Kill

this game is an RTS for the mainstream human of today. we want to go in, blow stuff up, and go on and live our life once we're done. Some how PC gamers have something stuck up their collective ass that dismisses anything that doesn't require multiple flo-charts and an encyclopedia to play. This is what halo did for the FPS, and this is what halo wars attempted to do.

The PC gaming cult has this truly retarded idea that every game should be complicated, deep, and time consuming, And that they should only pay 50 dollars for an infinite amount of game content, despite the growing difficulty to make a high graphics game today....

Even David portreus, or Norman Shwartzkopf would see the insane micromanaging tha gos on inside your snobby PC gamers RTSs would be asinine when in truth all that need to be done is Deploy, Move, Kill,

Halo Wars= Deploy Move Kill

afrosud12

Yeah, shallow gameplay = good gameplay. Which is why the Wii has so many great and exciting games for adults.

[QUOTE="metrohub92"][QUOTE="dan-rofl-copter"]Its a good RTS for consoles and halo fans (myself) But for PC RTS fans (my self also) you have to look at it in a different way to realise it is not that bad.Legendaryscmt

When all else fails, make a bad post.

isnt that how you do it on here.

If memory serves me correctly, it did change the RTS genre on the consoles. RTS games on the consoles have been pretty iffy due to the control schemes, and with what I've heard about Halo Wars, the controls do the game justice. However, keep in mind that Halo Wars isn't a very deep and complex RTS game. You gotta learn how to crawl before you can run.Legendaryscmt

[QUOTE="noxboxlive"]i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad um hellooo this website hasnt done a good review for about 3 years. every where else got a 8.5 or higher.IIISpartan007

i disagree i think they do great reviews at gamespot. and further besides the control scheme was has been done better in the game. small armie sizes or was it the short campaign. and other sites are just hyping up a game that obviously didnt do any better than say red alert. And i think red alert was way better than this game. this game had smoth action and graphics but nothing more

Halo Wars= Deploy Move Kill

afrosud12

lol it got a 9 in GameInformer. Gamespot has had crappy reviews that nit pick and show you as much negative stuff as they can unless its a PS3 title like MGS4 or either one of the Resistance games I've noticed there kind of biased but then again so is gameinformer none of there staff actually likes RPGs either that or they pick people that don't like them to review them. But in the end this is a useless post because you haven't played the whole game so you don't know what your talking about.kylekatarn08

Its a good game. Just because GS criminally underrated it (just like most games they review nowadays) doesnt mean its a bad title.Pdiddy105

Listen kid GS hasnt done a good review since like 2 or 3 years? i dont listen to them as much as i did before and btw IGN gave Halo wars an 8.5 or something like that i recall and thats what they deserve because Ensemble made this and they were great developers. Halo wars did change the rts genre on the xbox , all the controls for the RTS on consoles were kind of uncomfortable until this game and i dont even care if i cant control the flood or the covenant on the campaing its an awesome game and your bashing halo for not having stuff the devs said it wouldnt have in the first place.

Nuff said GS

[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]Its a good game. Just because GS criminally underrated it (just like most games they review nowadays) doesnt mean its a bad title.wizdom

somebodies feelings were hurt and IN MY OPINION HALO WARS IS BAD DUMB DUMB. just because u worship it doesnt m,ean i have to. i think that its bad for simple reasons one being there are only 2 races u can play and the campain looks short that and you cant play as the covenant at the end or even the flood. the unit count is so dam low i feel like im playing with a small advanced unit or squad instead of a army.it should be calld halo fight instead of wars becuase if thats a war then ive been in a few myself.

If memory serves me correctly, it did change the RTS genre on the consoles. RTS games on the consoles have been pretty iffy due to the control schemes, and with what I've heard about Halo Wars, the controls do the game justice. However, keep in mind that Halo Wars isn't a very deep and complex RTS game. You gotta learn how to crawl before you can run.Legendaryscmt

the demo WAS the game. Short, 1 usable race, low unit count, no depth. The Simple controls are good, but not the simple mechanicsmatt2kvx

this game is an RTS for the mainstream human of today. we want to go in, blow stuff up, and go on and live our life once we're done. Some how PC gamers have something stuck up their collective ass that dismisses anything that doesn't require multiple flo-charts and an encyclopedia to play. This is what halo did for the FPS, and this is what halo wars attempted to do.

The PC gaming cult has this truly retarded idea that every game should be complicated, deep, and time consuming, And that they should only pay 50 dollars for an infinite amount of game content, despite the growing difficulty to make a high graphics game today....

Even David portreus, or Norman Shwartzkopf would see the insane micromanaging tha gos on inside your snobby PC gamers RTSs would be asinine when in truth all that need to be done is Deploy, Move, Kill,

Halo Wars= Deploy Move Kill

afrosud12

[QUOTE="wizdom"][QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]Its a good game. Just because GS criminally underrated it (just like most games they review nowadays) doesnt mean its a bad title.IIISpartan007

somebodies feelings were hurt and IN MY OPINION HALO WARS IS BAD DUMB DUMB. just because u worship it doesnt m,ean i have to. i think that its bad for simple reasons one being there are only 2 races u can play and the campain looks short that and you cant play as the covenant at the end or even the flood. the unit count is so dam low i feel like im playing with a small advanced unit or squad instead of a army.it should be calld halo fight instead of wars becuase if thats a war then ive been in a few myself.

I didn't really like the demo that much, there's nothing that innovative about it...

And the menu/controls felt pretty similar to C&C: Kane's Wrath imo.

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad. and i knew it would. it drove me nuts when i saw that thread saying it would change the rts genre yeah right. if anything this game short of its cool cutscenes embarassed the genre and didnt do anything new AT ALL. the rmie sizes were so low and the flood wasnt able to be used and u couldnt even play as the covenant second time through. In my opinion i thought this game was horrible...Just like halo 3 and 2

IIISpartan007

this fool never even played the game. go hate on your blog fool.donmega1

i pitty da fool

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad. and i knew it would. it drove me nuts when i saw that thread saying it would change the rts genre yeah right. if anything this game short of its cool cutscenes embarassed the genre and didnt do anything new AT ALL. the rmie sizes were so low and the flood wasnt able to be used and u couldnt even play as the covenant second time through. In my opinion i thought this game was horrible...Just like halo 3 and 2

IIISpartan007

Nobody has even played the full game yet. You have absolutely no grounds to bash this game. If you dislike the demo fine, but any other claim is baseless. Gamespot's reviews do not determine whether or not a game is good or bad. Sometimes, and I repeat SOMETIMES, they are on the mark and can give you a good idea about whether or not a game is solid, but other games get the shaft hardcore. They'll defend GTA IV to the end as the most perfect game of all time along with MGS4. I'm sorry but I don't care how good GTA IV is, the original HALO was a better game, and what did Gamespot give the original HALO?... a 9.7, which isn't a bad score, but if they found fault in Halo how is it that they overlook flaws elsewhere. The point is you should form your own opinion, and not be a puppet that gamespot pulls on a string to mimic its own stupid opinions as absolute fact, and if you are going to base your decision of buying a game on reviews, use multiple sites and get a good feel for what MANY people are saying. Statistically making decisions based on the opinion of one man is ridiculous. So overall all of the pregame bashing of something you've never seen or played before is just that... ridiculous.

in my opinion, dont make a game of a genre that is known to have control issues on a particular platform unless you CAN make it good.

just because a game is a "good step in the right direction" doesnt make it a good game. have i played it? no. but i have researched it and watched videos and honestly, every complaint people have had about the game seems to show up pretty clearly.

in my opinion, dont make a game of a genre that is known to have control issues on a particular platform unless you CAN make it good.

just because a game is a "good step in the right direction" doesnt make it a good game. have i played it? no. but i have researched it and watched videos and honestly, every complaint people have had about the game seems to show up pretty clearly.

no i dont trust GS the way i used to before kane and lynch but 99% of the games theyve reviewed and that i own i completely agree with their reviews on them. Thats why i also cross check with sites like IGN just to make sure.Mindgame_1

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad. and i knew it would. it drove me nuts when i saw that thread saying it would change the rts genre yeah right. if anything this game short of its cool cutscenes embarassed the genre and didnt do anything new AT ALL. the rmie sizes were so low and the flood wasnt able to be used and u couldnt even play as the covenant second time through. In my opinion i thought this game was horrible...Just like halo 3 and 2

IIISpartan007

if halo 3 and 2 sucks then why the hell is spartan in your name?

[QUOTE="Mindgame_1"]

in my opinion, dont make a game of a genre that is known to have control issues on a particular platform unless you CAN make it good.

just because a game is a "good step in the right direction" doesnt make it a good game. have i played it? no. but i have researched it and watched videos and honestly, every complaint people have had about the game seems to show up pretty clearly.

no i dont trust GS the way i used to before kane and lynch but 99% of the games theyve reviewed and that i own i completely agree with their reviews on them. Thats why i also cross check with sites like IGN just to make sure.doomsoth

[QUOTE="IIISpartan007"]

i knew halo wars was gonna be bad and here it is a 6.0 or 6.5 watever either way it did bad. and i knew it would. it drove me nuts when i saw that thread saying it would change the rts genre yeah right. if anything this game short of its cool cutscenes embarassed the genre and didnt do anything new AT ALL. the rmie sizes were so low and the flood wasnt able to be used and u couldnt even play as the covenant second time through. In my opinion i thought this game was horrible...Just like halo 3 and 2

zeblon123

if halo 3 and 2 sucks then why the hell is spartan in your name?

ha ha ha maybe hes a spartan from 300?

[QUOTE="doomsoth"][QUOTE="Mindgame_1"]

in my opinion, dont make a game of a genre that is known to have control issues on a particular platform unless you CAN make it good.

just because a game is a "good step in the right direction" doesnt make it a good game. have i played it? no. but i have researched it and watched videos and honestly, every complaint people have had about the game seems to show up pretty clearly.

no i dont trust GS the way i used to before kane and lynch but 99% of the games theyve reviewed and that i own i completely agree with their reviews on them. Thats why i also cross check with sites like IGN just to make sure.Mindgame_1

[QUOTE="wizdom"][QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]Its a good game. Just because GS criminally underrated it (just like most games they review nowadays) doesnt mean its a bad title.IIISpartan007

somebodies feelings were hurt and IN MY OPINION HALO WARS IS BAD DUMB DUMB. just because u worship it doesnt m,ean i have to. i think that its bad for simple reasons one being there are only 2 races u can play and the campain looks short that and you cant play as the covenant at the end or even the flood. the unit count is so dam low i feel like im playing with a small advanced unit or squad instead of a army.it should be calld halo fight instead of wars becuase if thats a war then ive been in a few myself.