Bad reviews on reach

  • 53 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

#51 deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts
I don't really care for it. The graphics aren't a step up, and the gameplay has not evolved since Halo 3. I'm not a hater, I just think that they should have evolved the formula or at least make a few small tweaks. I was disappointed with ODST for those exact reasons.
Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

I'm baffled at how it got a 5 from Gameshark and saying it has a terrible campaign and not worth full price.

mitu123

The author, who I won't mention because he doesn't deserve the traffic, seems to write for shock value more than anything else. I mean... the man wanted the Flood to be in the game.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#53 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

I'm baffled at how it got a 5 from Gameshark and saying it has a terrible campaign and not worth full price.

VoodooHak

The author, who I won't mention because he doesn't deserve the traffic, seems to write for shock value more than anything else. I mean... the man wanted the Flood to be in the game.

That wouldn't make any sense going by the story.:lol: