This topic is locked from further discussion.
Red SteelOreoMilkshakeSame here I was fooled by Ubisofts bullshots and I only played it for 45 minutes and then sold it a month after I played it.
Probably Halo 3. I bought it expecting the essence of amazing but could barely stand an hour of gameplay.....
Ehh, might not be the worst since I'm probably forgetting some games but it's certainly my biggest disappointment.
Edit: RE5 deserves a special mention for being crap.
[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"][QUOTE="Guppy507"] Framerate is the only thing the CoD series does right.lightleggy
Well they screwed it up on Black ops (PS3). Huge framrate drops. Its pathetic considering how poor the graphics are.
they didnt...I have black ops for the PS3 and I've never had a single framedrop...nor my cousins and all my friends who have the game for PS3...That's rubbish mate ... Black Ops on the PS3 drops frame all over the place - Fact.
Play it in Co-op and it almost crawls to a standstill.
Mario Strikers Charged.
I like Football (Soccer), I like Mario, so this should be cool.....
It sucked. :(
[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"][QUOTE="enterawesome"]Medal of Honor campaign was wretched. It was probably the most contrived, uninspired cash-in I've ever seen.enterawesomeDude are you really telling me there isn't a worse game out there you've played? Medol of Honor wasn't that bad. It just wasn't that inspired. No, Medal of Honor is the worst game I played this gen. The controls, level design, graphics, story, everything was uninspired and incredibly half-assed. There is not an ounce of imagination in that game. It was a game that a bunch of suits at EA decided should be made because CoD was popular and they wanted in. It shares nothing in common with other Medal of Honor games either, which is even more gross. Like they just threw on some recognizeable name onto an entirely unrelated game. It was all buisness, that game. Disgusting.
I really enjoyed it, the controls are just standard FPS controls, the story wasn't anything special, but what do you expect, there's not much story to just beinga soldier in a war, the graphics were decent, and the level design was pretty good. I found the campaign to be really fun,and it alsodidn't have anything stupid like cheap deaths out of nowhere, grenade spamming, infinite enemies, etc.(not to mention your teammates actually did somehting). Ialso like how it managed to get lots of epic moments in there (the long range sniping, the ATV scene, the helicopter scene); there was never reallyany boring moments, and it did all without going over the top and feeling just unrealistic and like the Devs weretrying too hard. I also really enjoyed the multiplayer, but to each their own I guess.
they didnt...I have black ops for the PS3 and I've never had a single framedrop...nor my cousins and all my friends who have the game for PS3...[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]
Well they screwed it up on Black ops (PS3). Huge framrate drops. Its pathetic considering how poor the graphics are.
-Snooze-
That's rubbish mate ... Black Ops on the PS3 drops frame all over the place - Fact.
Play it in Co-op and it almost crawls to a standstill.
I've played co-op both online and off, as well as the campaign twice, anda few hours of multiplayer and never really got any significant framerate drops, I doubt you've even played it.
Probably Ratchet ToD. Not that it was bad, the disappointment was definitely not a good experience though.
Biggest let down... Fable series... after Fable 1 I expected so much from Fable 2... instead they've slowly made it into a kids game.
Worst game... Two Worlds.. hands down. Don't say your game is going to top elder scrolls if it can't even play correctly.
My worst gaming experiences:
1. Final Fantasy III for the DS: other than the job systems, what was the point of this game? And I'm a Final Fantasy fan for the most part...this game was atrociously boring. It's kind of odd, because I greatly enjoyed the psp remakes of FFI/FFII, but not this game.
2. Runescape (online mmo, if this counts): crappy controls, ugly design, it's rather boring overall. I can't believe my friend recommended me to play this. Stay far away from Runescape.
3. Pokemon Diamond: If any Pokemon game has let me down, it has to be the 4th gen pokemon. Beat it, but lost interest rather quickly. No replay value for me. Platinum was far, far better.
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
[QUOTE="lightleggy"] they didnt...I have black ops for the PS3 and I've never had a single framedrop...nor my cousins and all my friends who have the game for PS3...StealthMonkey4
That's rubbish mate ... Black Ops on the PS3 drops frame all over the place - Fact.
Play it in Co-op and it almost crawls to a standstill.
I've played co-op both online and off, as well as the campaign twice, anda few hours of multiplayer and never really got any significant framerate drops, I doubt you've even played it.
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.
Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.
The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
That's rubbish mate ... Black Ops on the PS3 drops frame all over the place - Fact.
Play it in Co-op and it almost crawls to a standstill.
-Snooze-
I've played co-op both online and off, as well as the campaign twice, anda few hours of multiplayer and never really got any significant framerate drops, I doubt you've even played it.
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.
Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.
The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
You've obviously never played it, unless you're some sot of superhuman robot hybrid who has eyes like a hawk, there's no way you can tell any significant difference at all in framerate between PS3 and 360, the framerate difference is like 45 FPS on average compared to 60 FPS on average, majority of movies, even Blu-Ray are only 24 FPS and flow smoothly. I don't care whether you care, I'm just pointing out the bulls*** of your post.
The framerate on PS3 "Crawls to a standstill" Lol... what is this, I don't even.:lol:
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]
I've played co-op both online and off, as well as the campaign twice, anda few hours of multiplayer and never really got any significant framerate drops, I doubt you've even played it.
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.
Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.
The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
You've obviously never played it, unless you're some sot of superhuman robot hybrid who has eyes like a hawk, there's no way you can tell any significant difference at all in framerate between PS3 and 360, the framerate difference is like 45 FPS on average compared to 60 FPS on average, majority of movies, even Blu-Ray are only 24 FPS and flow smoothly. I don't care whether you care, I'm just pointing out the bulls*** of your post.
The framerate on PS3 "Crawls to a standstill" Lol... what is this, I don't even.:lol:
he's definitely right, even just playing on 360, theres a noticable difference from mw2 to bo, the framerate isn't nearly as stable and will stutter alot[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"][QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.
Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.
The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
savagetwinkie
You've obviously never played it, unless you're some sot of superhuman robot hybrid who has eyes like a hawk, there's no way you can tell any significant difference at all in framerate between PS3 and 360, the framerate difference is like 45 FPS on average compared to 60 FPS on average, majority of movies, even Blu-Ray are only 24 FPS and flow smoothly. I don't care whether you care, I'm just pointing out the bulls*** of your post.
The framerate on PS3 "Crawls to a standstill" Lol... what is this, I don't even.:lol:
he's definitely right, even just playing on 360, theres a noticable difference from mw2 to bo, the framerate isn't nearly as stable and will stutter alotEven playing the "subpar" PS3 version probably 50 hours at least in multiple modes, I've noticed no frame rate dips. I even watched the Digital Foundry clips and besides the framerate supposedly dropping low I could notice absolutely no change in the video even when the frame rate dropped lower. Maybe my eyesight is just terrible, which it's not, or this is being blown way out of proportion.
And saying the framerate "crawls to a standstill" is definitely strecthing it a lot.
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
-Snooze-
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]
You've obviously never played it, unless you're some sot of superhuman robot hybrid who has eyes like a hawk, there's no way you can tell any significant difference at all in framerate between PS3 and 360, the framerate difference is like 45 FPS on average compared to 60 FPS on average, majority of movies, even Blu-Ray are only 24 FPS and flow smoothly. I don't care whether you care, I'm just pointing out the bulls*** of your post.
The framerate on PS3 "Crawls to a standstill" Lol... what is this, I don't even.:lol:
he's definitely right, even just playing on 360, theres a noticable difference from mw2 to bo, the framerate isn't nearly as stable and will stutter alotEven playing the "subpar" PS3 version probably 50 hours at least in multiple modes, I've noticed no frame rate dips. I even watched the Digital Foundry clips and besides the framerate supposedly dropping low I could notice absolutely no change in the video even when the frame rate dropped lower. Maybe my eyesight is just terrible, which it's not, or this is being blown way out of proportion.
And saying the framerate "crawls to a standstill" is definitely strecthing it a lot.
it might not be a stand still, but its jittery and distracting, its definitly playbable,[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]
You've obviously never played it, unless you're some sot of superhuman robot hybrid who has eyes like a hawk, there's no way you can tell any significant difference at all in framerate between PS3 and 360, the framerate difference is like 45 FPS on average compared to 60 FPS on average, majority of movies, even Blu-Ray are only 24 FPS and flow smoothly. I don't care whether you care, I'm just pointing out the bulls*** of your post.
The framerate on PS3 "Crawls to a standstill" Lol... what is this, I don't even.:lol:
he's definitely right, even just playing on 360, theres a noticable difference from mw2 to bo, the framerate isn't nearly as stable and will stutter alotEven playing the "subpar" PS3 version probably 50 hours at least in multiple modes, I've noticed no frame rate dips. I even watched the Digital Foundry clips and besides the framerate supposedly dropping low I could notice absolutely no change in the video even when the frame rate dropped lower. Maybe my eyesight is just terrible, which it's not, or this is being blown way out of proportion.
And saying the framerate "crawls to a standstill" is definitely strecthing it a lot.
Black ops drops frames regardless of platform, dont know why considering MW2 is such a stable experience by comparrison. and you'd of thought they could have at least maintained what infinity ward acheived.[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"][QUOTE="enterawesome"]Medal of Honor campaign was wretched. It was probably the most contrived, uninspired cash-in I've ever seen.enterawesomeDude are you really telling me there isn't a worse game out there you've played? Medol of Honor wasn't that bad. It just wasn't that inspired. No, Medal of Honor is the worst game I played this gen. The controls, level design, graphics, story, everything was uninspired and incredibly half-assed. There is not an ounce of imagination in that game. It was a game that a bunch of suits at EA decided should be made because CoD was popular and they wanted in. It shares nothing in common with other Medal of Honor games either, which is even more gross. Like they just threw on some recognizeable name onto an entirely unrelated game. It was all buisness, that game. Disgusting.
Im sorry I just cant agree with you. Lets put it this way if MOH had the customazation opintions in MP mode that Black ops or hell BFBC2 I would say its a better game then Black ops and MW2. The single player was a good experiance and it was better then modernCOD(imo)which feels like michal bay made the dam thing. I will admit MOH had like 1 or 2 over the top moments but COD is filled with them and explosions.
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
Lto_thaG
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]
I own it, I don't really care what you believe to be honest.Fact is, and you can go see digital foundry if you like, COD has framerare drops all over the place, and during co-op they're far more significant. That's the Xbox version.The PS3 version performs worse in all aspects.
Blabadon
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment