Xbox One Price Drops to £300 in UK

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44071 Posts

Man, pretty soon X1 will be cheaper than 360. :o

Now, that said, nobody in their right mind should complain about the consumer needing to pay less right? :P

Anyhooey, will this persuade many over the pond to nab themselves a X1 soon?

What say you?

The Story.

---

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/xbox-one-price-drops-to-ps300-in-uk/1100-6426577/

Xbox One Price Drops to £300 in UK

Retail promotion begins across the country.

Microsoft has reduced the UK retail price of Xbox One to £299.99, the corporation has confirmed, as part of a new sales promotion.

The discount is the latest development in a long-running series of revisions to the Xbox One's retail price, as part of a wider bid to remain competitive with the industry's current best-selling home console, the PlayStation 4.

Though it launched in November 2013 at £429, the Xbox One's price was cut to £400 just four months later. Then in May 2014, Microsoft scrapped Kinect as a mandatory accessory and began listing the console for £350. By September, that solus version was cut to £330 as part of a price promotion--which Microsoft said was temporary at first, but became standard over time.

The latest revision pulls the Xbox One price below the £300 mark for the first time. Microsoft has told MCV that it was UK retailers that have spurred the changes, though the corporation is advertising the deal on TV.

It is not clear whether retailers will revert the Xbox One price back to £330.

A Microsoft spokesperson said: “This is a UK-only retail promotion and offers great value for fans looking to buy an Xbox One ahead of the launch of 2015’s highly-anticipated games like The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain and Batman: Arkham Knight, along with Xbox exclusives such as Rise of the Tomb Raider, Forza Motorsport 6 and Halo 5: Guardians.”

Avatar image for FoxbatAlpha
FoxbatAlpha

10669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 FoxbatAlpha
Member since 2009 • 10669 Posts

Well have a spot of tea on me then ole chap!

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

All the price drops/bundles and still last place

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

178847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 178847 Posts

There are no games for it....so it's still too expensive.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44071 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

There are no games for it....so it's still too expensive.

Nah, it only has the this gens finest Racing FH2, FPS MCC and TPS, SO so I'm a gonna need to disagree. :P

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44071 Posts

@finalstar2007 said:

All the price drops/bundles and still last place

Wii U don't count eh? :P

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52429 Posts

Lovely.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

45125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 SolidGame_basic
Member since 2003 • 45125 Posts

price drops are great, but game drops would be better

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

Price drops are good, but it needs some games to launch to make it look appealing. Last years launches attracted buyers last year, they shouldn't rely on last years launches to push the machine this year. Yes SO and FH2 are great, I personally don't see too many people jumping on for MCC even if it is mainly fixed, that damage is done imo. But they need stuff to come out now to make it look more appealing than the PS4 which just launched Bloodborne and the Order. I know the Order isn't a great game, but people like good graphics for the wow pretty factor. I love my X1, but it's lineup so far this year has been very weak.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60714 Posts

Still trying to catch up to the #1 console in the world and current gen 8 console leader PS4.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50563 Posts

Sales promotion? I thought the first cut was a temporary Sales promotion? Lol, crazy how the price has dropped.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44071 Posts

@Chutebox said:

Sales promotion? I thought the first cut was a temporary Sales promotion? Lol, crazy how the price has dropped.

Yeah but for me who's a big fan of a few of the Xbox IP's it's been great I mean, I bought X1 with MCC for a $100.00 less than what I paid for 360 alone plus 35-40 bucks a year for XBLG 1 year sub off ebay and getting tons of free games. The least expensive gen I can ever recall.. by far. :D

Avatar image for clr84651
clr84651

5643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By clr84651
Member since 2010 • 5643 Posts

@finalstar2007 said:

All the price drops/bundles and still last place

No, that's actually the Wii U in last place.

Out a year before PS4 and X1 and still last. Pathetic!

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

Over the bank holiday it went lower than that going off the VideoGamer UK podcast, Crazy how quick it's dropped.

Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts

Dat desperation

Avatar image for bulby_g
bulby_g

1861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 bulby_g
Member since 2005 • 1861 Posts

Meh, still no interest. Give me some games I want and I'll bite.

Avatar image for raugutcon
raugutcon

5576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#18 raugutcon
Member since 2014 • 5576 Posts

I don´t understand why you English have to pay pretty much 50% more for the same stuff, absolutely insane price, MSRP in Mexico is around $ 400 US and still you can find them for $320-350 ( wo Kinect ).

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44071 Posts

@raugutcon said:

I don´t understand why you English have to pay pretty much 50% more for the same stuff, absolutely insane price, MSRP in Mexico is around $ 400 US and still you can find them for $320-350 ( wo Kinect ).

Big gubment comes with big taxes but ya know, they get stuff for free lol. :P

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@raugutcon said:

I don´t understand why you English have to pay pretty much 50% more for the same stuff, absolutely insane price, MSRP in Mexico is around $ 400 US and still you can find them for $320-350 ( wo Kinect ).

their prices include VAT, which is like 20%

Avatar image for misterpmedia
misterpmedia

6209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#21 misterpmedia
Member since 2013 • 6209 Posts

lol christ. It's going to be like £200 by holiday season isn't it. Why buy now? MS will be even more desperate by then.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

$299 this holiday in the U,.S. confirmed.

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#23 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4575 Posts

Do we think the X1 will reach $299 this year? Say an E3 sale, or will it be more towards the holidays or will it not happen at all this year?

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

@FoxbatAlpha said:

Well have a spot of tea on me then ole chap!

Pip pip, cheerio old sport...

In all seriousness though it possibly didn't need it. I work in a fairly major game retailer in the UK as a side job, and gotta say, we normally sell around the same numbers for Xbox One and PS4 on a daily basis anyway. Only exception recently was Bloodborne's release, but it has dipped back since. This could be what results in the start of the Xbox retaking back the UK though.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts

Doesn't mean much really, both the XOne and PS4 sell for sub-£300 prices anyway.

You can even pick up bundles for less than £300. PS4 LBP3 bundle is £288 at Gamestop for example

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

@RR360DD said:

Doesn't mean much really, both the XOne and PS4 sell for sub-£300 prices anyway.

You can even pick up bundles for less than £300. PS4 LBP3 bundle is £288 at Gamestop for example

I keep hearing dodgy horror stories about the online Gamestop UK, so have been avoiding them personally. But yeah, prices are usually far cheaper if you hunt around. I was pretty happy with my Black Friday Xbox One actually, White Xbox plus Sunset and an extra controller for £305.

Avatar image for M8ingSeezun
M8ingSeezun

2313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 M8ingSeezun
Member since 2007 • 2313 Posts

Jeez, desperate times call for desperate measures.

Nothing against the MS platform, but clearly these are signs of desperation and catch up.

Avatar image for GarGx1
GarGx1

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 GarGx1
Member since 2011 • 10934 Posts

Still too much

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

Further proof of how unhealthy and uncompetitive the XBox brand is for gaming. They have to raid the piggy bank constantly rather than actually be competitive.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#30 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@SecretPolice:

Dude you know this place. This is seen as desperation even though every product in every industry goes on sale from time to time. Of course they want to get the console in more homes, that is kinda the purpose of business. They will be climbing out of the ditch they dug for themselves all gen long.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33784 Posts

BOMBA....

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#32 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

Further proof of how unhealthy and uncompetitive the XBox brand is for gaming. They have to raid the piggy bank constantly rather than actually be competitive.

If they weren't competitive Sony wouldn't have re thought their approach to consoles with the PS4.

Avatar image for ddlcpc
ddlcpc

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By ddlcpc
Member since 2007 • 887 Posts

I say wait for more drop.. and games.. 'll be my 1st ms console...

Avatar image for lglz1337
lglz1337

4959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34 lglz1337
Member since 2013 • 4959 Posts

translation

plz buy our system!

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@SecretPolice:

Dude you know this place. This is seen as desperation even though every product in every industry goes on sale from time to time. Of course they want to get the console in more homes, that is kinda the purpose of business. They will be climbing out of the ditch they dug for themselves all gen long.

Lol it's not gone on sale, it's a price cut. It's been on sale for £250 at Asda all week according to Neogaf with the lowest it hit being £240 from Simply games during Easter. Every product does not get a price cut "from time to time", you cut the RRP when the number of units you're moving is dropping.

It's only been on the market here for 18 months, they've gone from selling it at £420 to £300 already officially and to around £250 in reality, looks pretty desperate to me especially when the PS4 is still sat at it's launch price of £350 and can be found at £320 and has shown no sign of budging.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@Shewgenja said:

Further proof of how unhealthy and uncompetitive the XBox brand is for gaming. They have to raid the piggy bank constantly rather than actually be competitive.

If they weren't competitive Sony wouldn't have re thought their approach to consoles with the PS4.

To not do so would be to give up and die. There's a difference between being competitive and using infinite money Game Genie codes. One makes you a better player, homie. The other makes you XBox.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@chikenfriedrice said:

Dat desperation

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#38 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

@cainetao11 said:

@Shewgenja said:

Further proof of how unhealthy and uncompetitive the XBox brand is for gaming. They have to raid the piggy bank constantly rather than actually be competitive.

If they weren't competitive Sony wouldn't have re thought their approach to consoles with the PS4.

To not do so would be to give up and die. There's a difference between being competitive and using infinite money Game Genie codes. One makes you a better player, homie. The other makes you XBox.

Ok whatever that is supposed to mean. I think its clear to anyone who doesn't have a hate hard on for either company that the PS4 being much easier to develop for and using known tech rather than some bullshit Cell magic sales PR shit was because of the competition Sony got from the 360 last gen. This is how we, the consumers benefit from competition in an industry. Now you can hate MS all you want but to say they haven't brought competition to Sony and forced better moves for the consumer and vice versa is putting a blind fold on and sticking your fingers in your ears.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#39 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@hoosier7 said:

@cainetao11 said:

@SecretPolice:

Dude you know this place. This is seen as desperation even though every product in every industry goes on sale from time to time. Of course they want to get the console in more homes, that is kinda the purpose of business. They will be climbing out of the ditch they dug for themselves all gen long.

Lol it's not gone on sale, it's a price cut. It's been on sale for £250 at Asda all week according to Neogaf with the lowest it hit being £240 from Simply games during Easter. Every product does not get a price cut "from time to time", you cut the RRP when the number of units you're moving is dropping.

It's only been on the market here for 18 months, they've gone from selling it at £420 to £300 already officially and to around £250 in reality, looks pretty desperate to me especially when the PS4 is still sat at it's launch price of £350 and can be found at £320 and has shown no sign of budging.

I agree its desperate, but I think I spelled out why in the last sentence of my post you quoted.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40  Edited By Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

Ok whatever that is supposed to mean. I think its clear to anyone who doesn't have a hate hard on for either company that the PS4 being much easier to develop for and using known tech rather than some bullshit Cell magic sales PR shit was because of the competition Sony got from the 360 last gen. This is how we, the consumers benefit from competition in an industry. Now you can hate MS all you want but to say they haven't brought competition to Sony and forced better moves for the consumer and vice versa is putting a blind fold on and sticking your fingers in your ears.

The same one you're wearing by ignoring how easy to develop games was for the PS1. You're just towing the same tired party lines acting like gaming was nonexistant before the Xbox came out. It's just as easy to blame XBox for the fact that PSN is pay-walled, you know. At least there isn't historic precedence for that.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

Geez are cows really complaining about a price drop? Seriously, as if this were a bad thing. If you're not a MS shareholder, wtf do you care cows? Are cows scared it might actually pick up some steam?

Cows complain about the dumbest things...jokes of SWs

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#42 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

@cainetao11 said:

Ok whatever that is supposed to mean. I think its clear to anyone who doesn't have a hate hard on for either company that the PS4 being much easier to develop for and using known tech rather than some bullshit Cell magic sales PR shit was because of the competition Sony got from the 360 last gen. This is how we, the consumers benefit from competition in an industry. Now you can hate MS all you want but to say they haven't brought competition to Sony and forced better moves for the consumer and vice versa is putting a blind fold on and sticking your fingers in your ears.

The same one you're wearing by ignoring how easy to develop games was for the PS1. You're just towing the same tired party lines acting like gaming was nonexistant before the Xbox came out. It's just as easy to blame XBox for the fact that PSN is pay-walled, you know. At least there isn't historic precedence for that.

Well if you like giving people a pass for their own behavior go ahead. How am I ignoring how easy it was to develop games for the PS1? That gen wasn't in conversation or debate. I bet I have been gaming longer than you son, I know its been going on longer than xbox.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@Shewgenja said:

@cainetao11 said:

Ok whatever that is supposed to mean. I think its clear to anyone who doesn't have a hate hard on for either company that the PS4 being much easier to develop for and using known tech rather than some bullshit Cell magic sales PR shit was because of the competition Sony got from the 360 last gen. This is how we, the consumers benefit from competition in an industry. Now you can hate MS all you want but to say they haven't brought competition to Sony and forced better moves for the consumer and vice versa is putting a blind fold on and sticking your fingers in your ears.

The same one you're wearing by ignoring how easy to develop games was for the PS1. You're just towing the same tired party lines acting like gaming was nonexistant before the Xbox came out. It's just as easy to blame XBox for the fact that PSN is pay-walled, you know. At least there isn't historic precedence for that.

Well if you like giving people a pass for their own behavior go ahead. How am I ignoring how easy it was to develop games for the PS1? That gen wasn't in conversation or debate. I bet I have been gaming longer than you son, I know its been going on longer than xbox.

Well, fair enough then. People act like Playstation is synonymous with satanically hard to program for consoles. Admittedly, the PS2 and PS3 were silly but the PS1 was so simply to make games for that they made an SDK publicly available with the Net Yaroze. One could argue that XDK was just jocking Sony's old flavor in that regard.

As far as gaming longer, it's possible. I started gaming in 1985 with an Atari 2600.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts
@chikenfriedrice said:

Dat desperation

Aren't you a lem?

@misterpmedia said:

lol christ. It's going to be like £200 by holiday season isn't it. Why buy now? MS will be even more desperate by then.

No more desperate than your trolling attempts.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#45 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@Shewgenja:

Oh yeah, I am aware of the PS1 and its SDK. Even the PS2 I wouldn't say was all that hard to dev for was it? It really became in the notice with PS3 because they finally had competition in the 360 and lost the sales race to Wii.

I am 42, started gaming in the 1970s on my brothers pong console. That was dick comment by me and I apologize.

Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries: I am gamer first but I do favor the Xbox brand. But you must admit they are almost giving these away now and I don't think they need to act so needy, since it's not selling horribly.

Avatar image for ProtossX
ProtossX

2880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 ProtossX
Member since 2005 • 2880 Posts

dat pricedrop

sony u realize lower price = more sales right

the casuals seeing the price disparity th eones that still are on ps3/360

if they see a console thats 300 and yours 400 there going over just like when xbox was 500 and ps4 was 400

its the same kinda thing sony realize whats going on drop ur price to 300

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@Shewgenja:

Oh yeah, I am aware of the PS1 and its SDK. Even the PS2 I wouldn't say was all that hard to dev for was it? It really became in the notice with PS3 because they finally had competition in the 360 and lost the sales race to Wii.

I am 42, started gaming in the 1970s on my brothers pong console. That was dick comment by me and I apologize.

It's all good. It's System Wars. We're supposed to be like eternal enemies and stuff here. The PS2 really was a super bitch to code for. Worse than the PS3 in a lot of ways, even. At least it had a better pixel fill-rate than the PS3 although that came from tweaking your code to run on the two vector units a lot.

Avatar image for misterpmedia
misterpmedia

6209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#49  Edited By misterpmedia
Member since 2013 • 6209 Posts

@Salt_The_Fries said:

@misterpmedia said:

lol christ. It's going to be like £200 by holiday season isn't it. Why buy now? MS will be even more desperate by then.

No more desperate than your trolling attempts.

By your own statement you justify my comment LOL salt_the_selfown

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#50 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

@cainetao11 said:

@Shewgenja:

Oh yeah, I am aware of the PS1 and its SDK. Even the PS2 I wouldn't say was all that hard to dev for was it? It really became in the notice with PS3 because they finally had competition in the 360 and lost the sales race to Wii.

I am 42, started gaming in the 1970s on my brothers pong console. That was dick comment by me and I apologize.

It's all good. It's System Wars. We're supposed to be like eternal enemies and stuff here. The PS2 really was a super bitch to code for. Worse than the PS3 in a lot of ways, even. At least it had a better pixel fill-rate than the PS3 although that came from tweaking your code to run on the two vector units a lot.

Didn't know that. Man I still remember going to the games and hobby store in Cross County mall to buy my PS2 bundle. They wouldn't sell the console unless you bought 2 games and an extra controller with it when it was scarce at launch. Fuckin loved that console.