Why XBOX ONE Launch Game was Cancelled - Obsidian

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for carlquincy
carlquincy

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By carlquincy
Member since 2012 • 391 Posts

Sounds like what happened to Scalebound as well.

Personally, I think MS is treating the gaming division way too "business-y". I understand that the gaming division ultimately has to make money and report to the share holders, so games that went over budget get cut.

But there is a art form or creative side to the gaming business that cannot be projected or budgeted right from the start of the project. We saw the successes of TLG and FFIV even after the extended development cycle.

Even if it both games were mediocre, fans do appreciate that the games were eventually made, and not cancelled midway through development. This feeds to the goodwill of the company, and fans are possibly more forgiving and willing to support their new projects.

Source

Tyranny is the reworked Stormlands

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

microsoft had an Obsidian rpg exclusive in the works and they pulled the plug?

jesus christ..I can't even..

"Urquhart went on to explain that when you're making a big-budget game, "there has to be someone at the publisher" who can defend the project and assure the higher-ups the game is going to be good. In the case of Stormlands, unfortunately, Obsidian didn't have someone like that to champion the game at Microsoft.

"There has to be someone with that attitude and the ability to defend the game," he added, using Baldur's Gate as an example of how important it was for them to have someone to champion the game at Interplay when poor European sales forecasts were going to negatively impact its success in American markets. "For a game to truly be big, it often has to be pushed and it has to have ads and PR," he explained.

Urquhart concluded by saying: "Why did Stormwinds get canceled? Stomwinds got canceled because we didn't have an advocate."

Avatar image for deactivated-5c0b07b32bf03
deactivated-5c0b07b32bf03

6005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5c0b07b32bf03
Member since 2014 • 6005 Posts

Simple answer: MS cancels things. It's just what they do.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

"It's business" as the Lems religiously say. Too bad, part of that business means attracting people to your platform with games. Last gen, I railed on here how MS treats gamers like a strip mine. They came into this generation doubling down on that mentality and the company that kept projects like The Last Guardian alive came and ate their lunch.

You would think some lessons would stick since the 1980's but a certain fanbase absolutely insists that they know everything about the future of gaming while doing jack goddamn shit in the present and never challenging their plastic box overlords to do better by them.

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

@lawlessx said:

microsoft had an Obsidian rpg exclusive in the works and they pulled the plug?

jesus christ..I can't even..

"Urquhart went on to explain that when you're making a big-budget game, "there has to be someone at the publisher" who can defend the project and assure the higher-ups the game is going to be good. In the case of Stormlands, unfortunately, Obsidian didn't have someone like that to champion the game at Microsoft.

"There has to be someone with that attitude and the ability to defend the game," he added, using Baldur's Gate as an example of how important it was for them to have someone to champion the game at Interplay when poor European sales forecasts were going to negatively impact its success in American markets. "For a game to truly be big, it often has to be pushed and it has to have ads and PR," he explained.

Urquhart concluded by saying: "Why did Stormwinds get canceled? Stomwinds got canceled because we didn't have an advocate."

Well that makes sense, if Microsoft is unsure about the product, it's not shaping up properly, and they're unsure if they should expend more money to finance it, and no one is defending it...

Cancelling the game is the obvious choice, that's like someone sitting at a parole board trying to get out and no one is there to advocate for their release...

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

"It's business" as the Lems religiously say. Too bad, part of that business means attracting people to your platform with games. Last gen, I railed on here how MS treats gamers like a strip mine. They came into this generation doubling down on that mentality and the company that kept projects like The Last Guardian alive came and ate their lunch.

You would think some lessons would stick since the 1980's but a certain fanbase absolutely insists that they know everything about the future of gaming while doing jack goddamn shit in the present and never challenging their plastic box overlords to do better by them.

Did an xbox fanboy piss on your dog or something?

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

CancelBone strikes again.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

Scalebound

Obsidian RPG

Halo Megabloks

Phantom Dust

Fable Legends

They have cancelled more games this gen than they've released lol.

Avatar image for spitfire-six
Spitfire-Six

1378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9 Spitfire-Six
Member since 2014 • 1378 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Scalebound

Obsidian RPG

Halo Megabloks

Phantom Dust

Fable Legends

They have cancelled more games this gen than they've released lol.

Math is hard

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12183 Posts
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Scalebound

Obsidian RPG

Halo Megabloks

Phantom Dust

Fable Legends

They have cancelled more games this gen than they've released lol.

Halo Megabloks wasn't a real game, only a prototype.

Avatar image for carlquincy
carlquincy

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By carlquincy
Member since 2012 • 391 Posts

So Tyranny is the reworked Stormlands, which is sitting pretty decent at metacritic right now.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

@xhawk27 said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Scalebound

Obsidian RPG

Halo Megabloks

Phantom Dust

Fable Legends

They have cancelled more games this gen than they've released lol.

Halo Megabloks wasn't a real game, only a prototype.

Shame because that prototype looked more fun than garbage they've actually released this gen like Recore and Quantum Break.

Avatar image for Boddicker
Boddicker

4458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Boddicker
Member since 2012 • 4458 Posts

An Obsidian RPG would have made me jealous, but still not enough reason to buy an X1.

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:
@xhawk27 said:
@NathanDrakeSwag said:

Scalebound

Obsidian RPG

Halo Megabloks

Phantom Dust

Fable Legends

They have cancelled more games this gen than they've released lol.

Halo Megabloks wasn't a real game, only a prototype.

Shame because that prototype looked more fun than garbage they've actually released this gen like Recore and Quantum Break.

Both of which you have not played.

Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

Microsoft keeps duking Lemmings and all they do is spread their cheeks harder.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#16 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38036 Posts

@carlquincy said:

Sounds like what happened to Scalebound as well.

Personally, I think MS is treating the gaming division way too "business-y". I understand that the gaming division ultimately has to make money and report to the share holders, so games that went over budget get cut.

But there is a art form or creative side to the gaming business that cannot be projected or budgeted right from the start of the project. We saw the successes of TLG and FFIV even after the extended development cycle.

Even if it both games were mediocre, fans do appreciate that the games were eventually made, and not cancelled midway through development. This feeds to the goodwill of the company, and fans are possibly more forgiving and willing to support their new projects.

Source

Tyranny is the reworked Stormlands

TLG was not a financial success. Now you can praise the scoring all you want but it did not make much money.

And you're right. MS runs things like a business, period. I also prefer to do business with game companies, not romanticize my interaction with them. MS provides some things I wish to make use of. Sony provides some things I wish to make use of. Its business, not personal.

Avatar image for spitfire-six
Spitfire-Six

1378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#17 Spitfire-Six
Member since 2014 • 1378 Posts
@carlquincy said:

Sounds like what happened to Scalebound as well.

Personally, I think MS is treating the gaming division way too "business-y". I understand that the gaming division ultimately has to make money and report to the share holders, so games that went over budget get cut.

But there is a art form or creative side to the gaming business that cannot be projected or budgeted right from the start of the project. We saw the successes of TLG and FFIV even after the extended development cycle.

Even if it both games were mediocre, fans do appreciate that the games were eventually made, and not cancelled midway through development. This feeds to the goodwill of the company, and fans are possibly more forgiving and willing to support their new projects.

Source

Tyranny is the reworked Stormlands

Sounds like they get a budget for the game and instead of maintain their budget they went over and wanted an increase because they had seen it happen before. So they expected more money

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

So much for lems stating that MS has all this cash for games. MS was dumb not getting behind Obsidian, they would of gotten a lot of us PC gamers to buy the xb1.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@daredevils2k said:

So much for lems stating that MS has all this cash for games. MS was dumb not getting behind Obsidian, they would of gotten a lot of us PC gamers to buy the xb1.

There's a reason why MS has massive cash at bank i.e. controlling their cost with a fix budget.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-13/why-microsoft-with-100-billion-is-borrowing-to-buy-linkedin

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

LOL @ the Pathetic MS shills making excuses for MS cancelling new IPs. Are you guys even gamers?

Avatar image for dynamitecop
dynamitecop

6395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By dynamitecop
Member since 2004 • 6395 Posts

@quadknight said:

LOL @ the Pathetic MS shills making excuses for MS cancelling new IPs. Are you guys even gamers?

This is wholly ironic coming from a person like you.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

44562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 44562 Posts

Weren't they working on that shitty Alien RPG that got pulled? I didn't even read the sauce but it was probably for the best not to let them taint the launch line-up.

Probably better for Obsidian too, the bias gaming media would have shit on anything they put out if it were an Xbox exclusive, even if it (and I doubt it) turned out to be good.

Avatar image for carlquincy
carlquincy

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 carlquincy
Member since 2012 • 391 Posts

@cainetao11 said:
@carlquincy said:

Sounds like what happened to Scalebound as well.

Personally, I think MS is treating the gaming division way too "business-y". I understand that the gaming division ultimately has to make money and report to the share holders, so games that went over budget get cut.

But there is a art form or creative side to the gaming business that cannot be projected or budgeted right from the start of the project. We saw the successes of TLG and FFIV even after the extended development cycle.

Even if it both games were mediocre, fans do appreciate that the games were eventually made, and not cancelled midway through development. This feeds to the goodwill of the company, and fans are possibly more forgiving and willing to support their new projects.

Source

Tyranny is the reworked Stormlands

TLG was not a financial success. Now you can praise the scoring all you want but it did not make much money.

And you're right. MS runs things like a business, period. I also prefer to do business with game companies, not romanticize my interaction with them. MS provides some things I wish to make use of. Sony provides some things I wish to make use of. Its business, not personal.

How is MS gonna provide you things you can make use of by cancelling games?

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#24 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17426 Posts

WTF?

Nobody noticed that the DEV cancelled the game.............NOT Microsoft?

They were trying to get MS to publish the game.

MS didnt cancel it.......

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

But hey, you have an exclusive game mode in FIFA!

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44065 Posts

SnowFlakes vs RealWorld?

You can only one. :P

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

69472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#27 Pedro  Online
Member since 2002 • 69472 Posts

@navyguy21: Ssshhh don't use facts and logic on this forum. It's frowned upon.

Avatar image for carlquincy
carlquincy

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 carlquincy
Member since 2012 • 391 Posts

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Avatar image for deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
deactivated-58abb194ab6fb

3984

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
Member since 2010 • 3984 Posts

@navyguy21:

So the devs canceled the game and idiot Sony trolls and fanboy in here trying to push this on MS LOL.

This is the best post of the day so far and it's still early. Plus, I love how they talking crap about MS running their company like a "business" as if Sony is their BFF LOL.

Avatar image for deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
deactivated-58abb194ab6fb

3984

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
Member since 2010 • 3984 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag:

Phantom Dust wasn't canceled.

Avatar image for kuu2
kuu2

12062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 kuu2
Member since 2005 • 12062 Posts

Sony Fan continue to be the clowns of SW.

Avatar image for dakur
Dakur

3275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Dakur
Member since 2014 • 3275 Posts

M$ is bad for gaming. They're wasting the time, resources and mental health of great devs just to cancel games or release crap. Please let the cancer known as M$ disappear from gaming for gamers and games sake.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44065 Posts

@kuu2 said:

Sony Fan continue to be the clowns of SW.

lol :P

Avatar image for kuu2
kuu2

12062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 kuu2
Member since 2005 • 12062 Posts

@SecretPolice: Ha! So true.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c1d0901c2aec
deactivated-5c1d0901c2aec

6762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By deactivated-5c1d0901c2aec
Member since 2016 • 6762 Posts

I would like to know the specific reason each of these projects where canceled. It's a shame because it looks as though there was real potential behind some of these games.

Avatar image for 360ru13r
360ru13r

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 360ru13r
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts

These types of topics either invite people who don't understand capitalism or are just young. Look I hate when a game gets cancelled as much as the next person but when you are making a product and it is being funded by others and not you personally people expect a nice return on investment. Yeah there is the creative side that want to make a great game and that is all well in dandy but someone somewhere has to care about cost. As entertainment as a whole continues to move forward the industries are going to naturally split themselves into two: Big Budget vs Indie. There will be a day when there is no in between.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@Pedro said:

@navyguy21: Ssshhh don't use facts and logic on this forum. It's frowned upon.

None of that is true. The article starts with:

"Obsidian Entertainment was developing a role-playing game called Stormlands for the launch of Xbox One that was ultimately canceled, and studio CEO Fergus Urquhart has come forward to reveal why Microsoft scrapped the project."

He goes on to explain that MS didn't have the budget for their game and they couldn't negotiate with them properly to get them to keep funding it. The devs totally wanted to keep making it. I don't know how @navyguy21 got that conclusion.

EDIT: If you follow the links to Kotaku, you'll find this:

"in March of 2012, Microsoft cancelled the RPG they’d contracted Obsidian to make for their new Xbox, which was then called Durango. Obsidian was calling the game Stormlands, according to a source, and they’d designed it to be one of the Xbox One’s premiere RPGs, but Microsoft axed it during a final greenlight meeting."

Nothing about Obsidian scrapping it.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#38  Edited By navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17426 Posts

@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44065 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#42 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17426 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

So are you saying that when a publisher is presented with a subpar game...............and they dont want to move forward................its the same as them cancelling the game?

You'd have to add a TON of cancelled games to every publisher out there, including Sony and MS.

Cancelled game usually refers to titles that have been greenlit, are in development, and then are scrapped.

Not titles scrapped because the publisher didnt like the product being presented.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 SecretPolice  Online
Member since 2007 • 44065 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

I'm going to go with the Fact the game was released under a new name. Those dirty dogs at MS Canceled the original name of the game by deciding not to publish I guess,

Get Mad, I am, perhaps we should riot, loot and burn things down over this. . lolololol :P

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#44 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17426 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

Of course you will, it fits the narrative.

Avatar image for deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
deactivated-58abb194ab6fb

3984

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-58abb194ab6fb
Member since 2010 • 3984 Posts

@navyguy21 said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

Of course you will, it fits the narrative.

Hmmmmmmmm

After reading the article now it does bring up the question of,

How do you cancel something you decided you didn't want???????? You seem to be right about that navyguy.

That's like someone coming to me and saying I got a hot blind date for you and I look her over and I say I'm not interested and then all of a sudden the narrative is I broke up with her LOL.

How did I break up with her if we was never together?

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46  Edited By Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60713 Posts

@Zero_epyon said:
@Pedro said:

@navyguy21: Ssshhh don't use facts and logic on this forum. It's frowned upon.

None of that is true. The article starts with:

"Obsidian Entertainment was developing a role-playing game called Stormlands for the launch of Xbox One that was ultimately canceled, and studio CEO Fergus Urquhart has come forward to reveal why Microsoft scrapped the project."

He goes on to explain that MS didn't have the budget for their game and they couldn't negotiate with them properly to get them to keep funding it. The devs totally wanted to keep making it. I don't know how @navyguy21 got that conclusion.

EDIT: If you follow the links to Kotaku, you'll find this:

"in March of 2012, Microsoft cancelled the RPG they’d contracted Obsidian to make for their new Xbox, which was then called Durango. Obsidian was calling the game Stormlands, according to a source, and they’d designed it to be one of the Xbox One’s premiere RPGs, but Microsoft axed it during a final greenlight meeting."

Nothing about Obsidian scrapping it.

Avatar image for carlquincy
carlquincy

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 carlquincy
Member since 2012 • 391 Posts
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

Thats different from what you initially said. You said that the dev cancelled the game, which is simply not true.

MS contracted Obsidian for a XB1 launch game, and dropped it at the final greenlight meeting. The game was eventually was reworked to Tyranny which was pretty well received critically. Given the context, I do consider it as MS cancelling the game.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@navyguy21 said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

Of course you will, it fits the narrative.

What narrative? Look I don't think this is a big deal. There's no need to spin this. MS canceled the game after they funded the game's development. You have yet to back up your claim that Obsidian cancelled the game. But now you're accusing me of having an agenda?

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@SecretPolice said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

MS decided not to publish vs MS canceled the game. Pick only one please. :P

Considering that the CEO of Obsidian, IGN, and Kotaku are using the word "cancelled" I'm going to go ahead with MS canceled the game, since it's also implied that they were funding the game at some point.

I'm going to go with the Fact the game was released under a new name. Those dirty dogs at MS Canceled the original name of the game by deciding not to publish I guess,

Get Mad, I am, perhaps we should riot, loot and burn things down over this. . lolololol :P

I'm not mad at all. This is not a big deal and there's no need to spin this at all.

Avatar image for Zero_epyon
Zero_epyon

20104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Zero_epyon
Member since 2004 • 20104 Posts

@navyguy21 said:
@Zero_epyon said:
@navyguy21 said:
@carlquincy said:

@navyguy21:

How did you conclude that? The interview clearly implied that MS cancelled it.

Read the article.

They wanted MS to publish the game but they said they didnt have an advocate at MS.

MS had contacted them to do a game for them and had a meeting to present what they were working on.

What they presented wasnt good so MS didnt publish it.

They eventually reworked the game and released it under a different name

It happens all the time.

Sony did the same thing with RIME and it ended up being picked up elsewhere

That's still MS cancelling it. Not Obsidian.

So are you saying that when a publisher is presented with a subpar game...............and they dont want to move forward................its the same as them cancelling the game?

You'd have to add a TON of cancelled games to every publisher out there, including Sony and MS.

Cancelled game usually refers to titles that have been greenlit, are in development, and then are scrapped.

Not titles scrapped because the publisher didnt like the product being presented.

The one thing you're omitting is that MS paid them to develop the game and then decided not to publish it. That means they cancelled the game. I'm not saying MS was right or wrong for it. That's not my argument.

"Cancelled game usually refers to titles that have been greenlit, are in development, and then are scrapped."

That's literally what happened.