I will definitely buy this game, but I'm waiting for Banjo Kazooie 3 before I buy a 360. But there is someting I don't understand. Why did Zelda: Windwaker get bashed to heck and back for its cell shaded graphics and kiddy look, but this game is being praised for it?
And I also don't see this game selling that well. Since yall always want a reason, well here's my reason. I have stated this case before, so some of yall may have read it. I just personally don't think the majority/core 360 audience will buy Trusty Bell, or up coming RPGs like it such as Blue Dragon, Infinite Undiscovery, Far East of Eden, and Cry On because of their colorful art styles. Two good examples of games with colorful art styles on the 360 that didn't sell well are Viva Pinata and Kameo. Both these games have extremely poor sales compaired to the more realistic games on the 360. I see the majority/core 360 owners buying Masss Effect, Fable 2, Two Worlds, and Elveon because of their realistic art style. A good example of 360 owners buying an RPG with a realistic art style is Elder Scrolls: Oblivion.
Here is how you can judge. Take a look at Mass Effect, Fable 2, Two Worlds, Elveon, Oblivion and other realistic RPGs or just any realistic game on 360, and then take a look at Trusty Bell, Blue Dragon, Infinite Undiscovery, Far East of Eden, Cry On, Viva Pinata, and Kameo (I know not all are RPGs and two have been released). Now what do you see? The 1st group has a more realistic art style that IMO cators the what the majority of what 360 owners want and buy. The 2nd group has a more colorful art style (could be seen as kiddy) which cators to only a few 360 owners and more to possible future owners. Now which group do you think will sell more and get more attention from the 360 audience? I personally think the 1st group would sell more and get more attention, even though I would probably root for the 2nd group. I hope I'm proven wrong and many 360 owners buy these games.
Log in to comment