Too bad the game itself will be far from incredible.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="deeliman"]ROFL!!! Guys the fish have cloud power each fish has about 3 teraflops of power moarrr then PS44444444!!!$$$%$-2But does it have dynamic fish AI?
FoxbatAlpha
Looks like a modern pc game.
Damn, console kids call this next gen? I feel bad for you guys, you really don't know what you're missing.
I'm sure it will be fun for those who love Call of Duty, but the real test will be for those that just thought the CoD games were okay or bad. Will this game bring that crowd in?
I doubt I'll check this out. Looks nice but the MMO craze is cramping my style. I was always more of a Halo fan than a CoD fan tho so I might try Destiny, though I still don't know if I want to spend money on that.
I'm not over-hyped for it, but it does look very nice!
Already preordered it on Origin, can't wait to max it out!
kipsta77
I don't really care if it has the frustrations of CoD... CoD4 had low points but it was a revolutionary game.
Titanfall doesn't look as revolutionary but it is a game I've never played, unlike Call of Duty. If I can play some competitive multiplayer with friends and have a blast with mech suits, I don't see any reason to not get it.
Killzone Shadow Fall doesn't look any better than PC games that have already come out. It's easiest to compare to Crysis 3, as they are both futuristic FPSs. And Killzone can't hold a candle to that game. Not even a contest. Even Crysis 2 looks better, and Crysis 1 back in 2007 was more technically impressive.
[QUOTE="gpuking"]Looks like 15fps to me...Guess you haven't seen what real next gen looks like.
Phazevariance
Yep. 15fps and a on-the-rails highly uninteractive scripted sequence straight out of Call Of Duty. Consoles really have pushed the bar.
Looks like 15fps to me...[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="gpuking"]
Guess you haven't seen what real next gen looks like.
uninspiredcup
Yep. 15fps and a on-the-rails highly uninteractive scripted sequence straight out of Call Of Duty. Consoles really have pushed the bar.
30fps and pretty open maps, you can do the objectives how you want. and while looking much, much, and much better than titanfall!
This isn't dead rising 3, 15 fps and still ugly!
Killzone Shadow Fall doesn't look any better than PC games that have already come out. It's easiest to compare to Crysis 3, as they are both futuristic FPSs. And Killzone can't hold a candle to that game. Not even a contest. Even Crysis 2 looks better, and Crysis 1 back in 2007 was more technically impressive.
realguitarhero5
Crysis 2 doesn't look better, crysis 1 is ugly compared to it... crysis 3 on max I can't disagree for now, maybe with the finished product!
It looks good, but I wouldn't call it incredible. The colours are very unsaturated and dull, much like a lot of the maps played on Call of Duty.
Nope. At least,not with dx11 and crytek's texture pack.Downloading maldohd 4 atm,but I doubt if it will make a huge difference.Even Crysis 2 looks better, and Crysis 1 back in 2007 was more technically impressive.
realguitarhero5
but I doubt if it will make a huge difference.call_of_duty_10
Your trolling is getting more and more obvious everyday.
[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]but I doubt if it will make a huge difference.faizan_faizan
Your trolling is getting more and more obvious everyday.
Except that it wasn't trolling at all. I genuinely think that shadowfall looks better than crysis 2 @ dx11 ultra w/ texture pack.Haven't tried the mod yet,but textures alone cannot make it better than killzone.[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"][QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]but I doubt if it will make a huge difference.call_of_duty_10
Your trolling is getting more and more obvious everyday.
Except that it wasn't trolling at all. I genuinely think that shadowfall looks better than crysis 2 @ dx11 ultra w/ texture pack.Haven't tried the mod yet,but textures alone cannot make it better than killzone. Aren't you implying that the vanilla and the MaldoHD 4 pack don't have such a huge difference?Aren't you implying that the vanilla and the MaldoHD 4 pack don't have such a huge difference?faizan_faizanIt's true though. Crysis 2 doesn't use high density voxel rendering. Killzone Shadow Fall does.
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]Aren't you implying that the vanilla and the MaldoHD 4 pack don't have such a huge difference?freedomfreakIt's true though. Crysis 2 doesn't use high density voxel rendering. Killzone Shadow Fall does. I still don't see any proof about that "How shocking" statement.
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]Aren't you implying that the vanilla and the MaldoHD 4 pack don't have such a huge difference?faizan_faizanIt's true though. Crysis 2 doesn't use high density voxel rendering. Killzone Shadow Fall does. I still don't see any proof about that "How shocking" statement. PM'd you.
[QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]Again, no.freedomfreakLooks, faizan, I'm not sending you pictures of my penis Wear an underwear or something.
[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"][QUOTE="faizan_faizan"]Except that it wasn't trolling at all. I genuinely think that shadowfall looks better than crysis 2 @ dx11 ultra w/ texture pack.Haven't tried the mod yet,but textures alone cannot make it better than killzone. Aren't you implying that the vanilla and the MaldoHD 4 pack don't have such a huge difference? I was trying to say that the mod won't do much to decrease the gap between the graphics of the two games,since there are things besides the textures that make kz better.Your trolling is getting more and more obvious everyday.
faizan_faizan
And since we are talking about this mod...Does anyone here have the two "fixes" on their HDD?The links on maldo's official blog are dead,and I can't find them anywhere.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment