can someone please name me 5-10 must have pc exclusives from the past 5 years or so?
This will be an easy task, as both this gen and last gen PC had more aaa-aa scoring exclusives than all consoles combined. And no, This does not include facebook games as they are neither scored or included in most sales charts, people only troll about those here.
Here is a few:
Civ V
StarCraft II
Stalker Series
Shogun II
Guild Wars 2
ARMA
Killing Floor
Planetside 2
DOTA2/LOL (Both AAAE and more hardcore + competitive + higher skillcap than any console game)
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
If you want extra challenges, maybe you should start playing with better players and not purposely handicap yourself.
It's like if a basketball player decided to only use one hand for playing instead of both for extra challenge. It's like your doing it wrong.
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
If you want extra challenges, maybe you should start playing with better players and not purposely handicap yourself.
It's like if a basketball player decided to only use one hand for playing instead of both for extra challenge. It's like your doing it wrong.
Why do you assume I was speaking of mp? I use controller for sp.
What mp shooters that supports controllers allow you to pick and choose the difficulty of mp opponents anyways?
Love the basketball comparison. It didn't dawn on you that playing and improving you're weak hand will make you a better player?
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
If you want extra challenges, maybe you should start playing with better players and not purposely handicap yourself.
It's like if a basketball player decided to only use one hand for playing instead of both for extra challenge. It's like your doing it wrong.
Why do you assume I was speaking of mp? I use controller for sp.
What mp shooters that supports controllers allow you to pick and choose the difficulty of mp opponents anyways?
Love the basketball comparison. It didn't dawn on you that playing and improving you're weak hand will make you a better player?
Why did I think about MP ? Well you responded to a guy who was talking about COD, a heavily aimed MP game.
Also, MP is where the real challenge happens, unless you play the impossible level mode of SP.
Obviously the level of difficulty in MP is where you play with players of the same level as you or higher/lower ranks (unlocks and experience).
If you love the basketball comparison, then you'd understand. Instead of getting better (using both hands) to play on the next gaming level, you rather handicap yourself (using one hand) and stay on the same level.
You don't make your enemy better or tougher, you make yourself purposely worst.
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
If you want extra challenges, maybe you should start playing with better players and not purposely handicap yourself.
It's like if a basketball player decided to only use one hand for playing instead of both for extra challenge. It's like your doing it wrong.
Why do you assume I was speaking of mp? I use controller for sp.
What mp shooters that supports controllers allow you to pick and choose the difficulty of mp opponents anyways?
Love the basketball comparison. It didn't dawn on you that playing and improving you're weak hand will make you a better player?
Why did I think about MP ? Well you responded to a guy who was talking about COD, a heavily aimed MP game.
Also, MP is where the real challenge happens, unless you play the impossible level mode of SP.
Obviously the level of difficulty in MP is where you play with players of the same level as you (unlocks and experience).
If you love the basketball comparison, then you'd understand. Instead of getting better (using both hands) to play on the next gaming level, you rather handicap yourself (using one hand) and stay on the same level.
You don't make your enemy better or tougher, you make yourself purposely worst.
Assumptions
Plenty of good sp shooters. And again mixing up control peripherals is ergonomically sound.
This makes no sense. Since you thought this was about CoD well CoD has matchmaking that connects you with players of all skill levels.
If you focus on one hand for awhile you become better.
I though it was common knowledge that learning new things like a different type of control is good for the brain.
I hate controller, its one of the main reasons consoles competitive scenes are jokes compared to PC.
Dat autoaim.
I like controllers as much as m/kb. Must suck to have narrow horizons.
Very few console shooters use auto aim. Go play Gears and see badly you get owned. Gears is more hardcore than TF 2 or CS Go and it has no aim assist whatsoever.
I hate controller, its one of the main reasons consoles competitive scenes are jokes compared to PC.
Dat autoaim.
I like controllers as much as m/kb. Must suck to have narrow horizons.
Very few console shooters use auto aim. Go play Gears and see badly you get owned. Gears is more hardcore than TF 2 or CS Go and it has no aim assist whatsoever.
can someone please name me 5-10 must have pc exclusives from the past 5 years or so?
Witcher 2 (timed exclusive, best on PC), Divinity Original Sin, Wasteland 2 (even so it´s still beta), Star Craft 2, Torchlight 2, Total War Shogun 2, Civ 5, Deponia Trillogy, Stalker Call of Pripyat, Red Orchestra 2, King´s Bounty, Faster Than Light, The Dark Eye: Chains of Satinav, Path of Exile, Galactic Civilizations 2
I hate controller, its one of the main reasons consoles competitive scenes are jokes compared to PC.
Dat autoaim.
I like controllers as much as m/kb. Must suck to have narrow horizons.
Very few console shooters use auto aim. Go play Gears and see badly you get owned. Gears is more hardcore than TF 2 or CS Go and it has no aim assist whatsoever.
just stop
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
I hate controller, its one of the main reasons consoles competitive scenes are jokes compared to PC.
Dat autoaim.
I like controllers as much as m/kb. Must suck to have narrow horizons.
Very few console shooters use auto aim. Go play Gears and see badly you get owned. Gears is more hardcore than TF 2 or CS Go and it has no aim assist whatsoever.
I hate having an inaccurate and slow aiming device that is clearly subpar. Why do you think console gets very few if none twitch shooters? They have to use the slow paced gaming style. They have to sometimes reduce mob density and ai (D3).
Why play racers with a fighting stick? Artificial difficulty =/= skill level.
The fact is kb/m is superior for shooters and consoles have low skill caps due to this.
I hate controller, its one of the main reasons consoles competitive scenes are jokes compared to PC.
Dat autoaim.
I like controllers as much as m/kb. Must suck to have narrow horizons.
Very few console shooters use auto aim. Go play Gears and see badly you get owned. Gears is more hardcore than TF 2 or CS Go and it has no aim assist whatsoever.
I hate having an inaccurate and slow aiming device that is clearly subpar. Why do you think console gets very few if none twitch shooters? They have to use the slow paced gaming style. They have to sometimes reduce mob density and ai (D3).
Why play racers with a fighting stick? Artificial difficulty =/= skill level.
The fact is kb/m is superior for shooters and consoles have low skill caps due to this.
How many twitch shooter does pc get? Gears is the only arena shooter that's still being made. Quake and Unreal failed on pc.
Skill cap has to do with the people you're playing and depth of the game. A noob will have more luck in TF 2 than Gears.
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
What exactly do you mean by that? They're both super old games, but back when they were super new, well, Quake in particular was super widely played.
I even remember the first Quakeworld master server they deployed couldn't handle the load. Was played for ages too, Quakeworld played competitively at Dreamhack 2009.
I mean, are you looking for a game with more longevity? How about starcraft one? How about WOW?
If I was on the dev team of either Unreal or Quake, I don't know how I could consider either one anything other than a colossal success.
What exactly do you mean by that? They're both super old games, but back when they were super new, well, Quake in particular was super widely played.
I even remember the first Quakeworld master server they deployed couldn't handle the load. Was played for ages too, Quakeworld played competitively at Dreamhack 2009.
I mean, are you looking for a game with more longevity? How about starcraft one? How about WOW?
If I was on the dev team of either Unreal or Quake, I don't know how I could consider either one anything other than a colossal success.
I guess I should have been more specific. UT 3 and Quake 4 flopped. UT 3 released same day as CoD 4 and pc gamers flocked to CoD. Quake 4 released same day as Fear if my memory serves and pc gamers flocked to Fear.
What exactly do you mean by that? They're both super old games, but back when they were super new, well, Quake in particular was super widely played.
I even remember the first Quakeworld master server they deployed couldn't handle the load. Was played for ages too, Quakeworld played competitively at Dreamhack 2009.
I mean, are you looking for a game with more longevity? How about starcraft one? How about WOW?
If I was on the dev team of either Unreal or Quake, I don't know how I could consider either one anything other than a colossal success.
UT 3 and Quake 4 flopped. UT 3 released same day as CoD 4 and pc gamers flocked to CoD. Quake 4 released same day as Fear if my memory serves and pc gamers flocked to Fear.
ok well if you say quake and unreal, i'm going to reply about quake and unreal.
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore without saying why, I give reasons why I believe Gears is more hardcore and then instead of providing a counterpoint you call me names. Typical.
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore without saying why, I give reasons why I believe Gears is more hardcore and then instead of providing a counterpoint you call me names. Typical.
"So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore without saying why, I give reasons why I believe Gears is more hardcore and then instead of providing a counterpoint you call me names. Typical.
"So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore without saying why, I give reasons why I believe Gears is more hardcore and then instead of providing a counterpoint you call me names. Typical.
"So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Let's start off by comparing movement I'll link a Gears movement tutorial and then you can link a TF 2 and CS Go movement tutorial and we'll compare the difficulty in learning these moves.
So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore without saying why, I give reasons why I believe Gears is more hardcore and then instead of providing a counterpoint you call me names. Typical.
"So you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
When did this happen?
Trolling or very bad memory. Maybe a combo
please, show me where I said that?
You quoted where I said Gears is more hardcore, bolded that part and said just stop. What else could you have meant by that?
You quoted where I said Gears is more hardcore, bolded that part and said just stop. What else could you have meant by that?
That you should stop posting.
So once again, please show me where "you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Yet you bolded that specific statement as if I'm clueless about Gears, CS and TF 2 and should stop posting. If that's not why you think I shoudl stop posting then what is?
Seems like you're just dancing around the fact that you can't give any reasons why Gears is less hardcore.
This is the thread that keeps on giving. I went to move my friend into his new house today, had two pairs of trousers fitted, and it's still going. Glorious.
This is the thread that keeps on giving. I went to move my friend into his new house today, had two pairs of trousers fitted, and it's still going. Glorious.
holy crap how do you fit two pairs of trousers on a house?
This is the thread that keeps on giving. I went to move my friend into his new house today, had two pairs of trousers fitted, and it's still going. Glorious.
holy crap how do you fit two pairs of trousers on a house?
You quoted where I said Gears is more hardcore, bolded that part and said just stop. What else could you have meant by that?
That you should stop posting.
So once again, please show me where "you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Yet you bolded that specific statement as if I'm clueless about Gears, CS and TF 2 and should stop posting. If that's not why you think I shoudl stop posting then what is?
Seems like you're just dancing around the fact that you can't give any reasons why Gears is less hardcore.
He's telling YOU to stop posting. This thread has gone on too many topics that all derailed from the "Hey Steam reached 8m concurrent users."
You quoted where I said Gears is more hardcore, bolded that part and said just stop. What else could you have meant by that?
That you should stop posting.
So once again, please show me where "you say I'm wrong about Gears being more hardcore"
Yet you bolded that specific statement as if I'm clueless about Gears, CS and TF 2 and should stop posting. If that's not why you think I shoudl stop posting then what is?
Seems like you're just dancing around the fact that you can't give any reasons why Gears is less hardcore.
He's telling YOU to stop posting. This thread has gone on too many topics that all derailed from the "Hey Steam reached 8m concurrent users."
Then why did he bold one specific part of my post? Because he assumed since Gears is a console game it must be a casual noob game. Then he had nothing to counter the video i posted.
Why are you so bothered by this thread? Some of you seem to have some sort of obsessive compulsive disorder about thread topics. What do you expect a pc player count brag thread to turn into on a forum called system wars?
It's your fault anyway. Someone asked a question and you snapped back with an insult about aim assist. As if aiming is easier with an aim assisted controller than a mouse. I'm starting to think you've never even played on a console before because you seem to know very little about it.
Seems like most hermits here get bent out of shape over the smallest things.
@ps4hasnogames: Nothing. Is probably the answer you were looking for/only accept. Now go back to playing CoD you aim assist consolite.
It's harder to aim on a controller with aim assist than a mouse with no assist.
It just shows you how bad a controller is for FPS.
It also shows how silly bldgirsh's comment was. I use a controller on most single player fps for the added challenge.
His answer was maybe silly, but he responded to someone even more silly asking a question outside of the topic, really.
Also, adds challenges ? That's a pretty lame argument. It's like if I said I'll use my left hand instead of my right hand for my mouse playing FPS (cause i'm a right hand). If atleast it's because you prefer the feel of it then ok. But for FPS controller is horrible and aim assist is evidence of such.
What's wrong with playing with a controller or left handed mousing for extra challenge?
I like the feel of controller and mouse equally.
Mixing up between the two is a good idea for ergonomic reasons alone.
If you want extra challenges, maybe you should start playing with better players and not purposely handicap yourself.
It's like if a basketball player decided to only use one hand for playing instead of both for extra challenge. It's like your doing it wrong.
Why do you assume I was speaking of mp? I use controller for sp.
What mp shooters that supports controllers allow you to pick and choose the difficulty of mp opponents anyways?
Love the basketball comparison. It didn't dawn on you that playing and improving you're weak hand will make you a better player?
Why did I think about MP ? Well you responded to a guy who was talking about COD, a heavily aimed MP game.
Also, MP is where the real challenge happens, unless you play the impossible level mode of SP.
Obviously the level of difficulty in MP is where you play with players of the same level as you (unlocks and experience).
If you love the basketball comparison, then you'd understand. Instead of getting better (using both hands) to play on the next gaming level, you rather handicap yourself (using one hand) and stay on the same level.
You don't make your enemy better or tougher, you make yourself purposely worst.
Assumptions
Plenty of good sp shooters. And again mixing up control peripherals is ergonomically sound.
This makes no sense. Since you thought this was about CoD well CoD has matchmaking that connects you with players of all skill levels.
If you focus on one hand for awhile you become better.
I though it was common knowledge that learning new things like a different type of control is good for the brain.
Assumptions about ? I'm just fallowing the argument here.
I've never said SP shooters are bad.
Mixing up control peripherals is good when it makes sense. Like for instance, playing a sports game like hockey is obviously better with a controller.
It makes perfect sense, the higher the rank the more experienced is the player and the more unlocks they have which brings the gaming to a whole new level.
Yes and if you focus on being better with the best tools available, you become better. Not handicap yourself to become average at best.
The only thing you'll learn about using a controller for FPS is that's it's worst, and your brain should probably tell you that.
Log in to comment