@delta3074 said:
SONY thinks there devs could do a better job?
Yeah right, when SONY first party studios struggle to make a AAAE game at the moment, the only AAAE on the PS4 is bloodborne and thats not first party development.
Regardless of what Tomb raider sales where like it's a good game.
Theres SO much butthurt from Cows on here about Tomb raider.
Watch all the A holes that slag it off on the Xbone run out and buy it day one when it eventually gets to the Ps4.
But all i see at the moment is Cows crying because they cannot get a bloody good game like Rise of the tomb raider on there console.
Hahahahaaa are you shitting me.? Hahahahaaa
Halo 5 lowest score halo ever.
Forza 5 lowest score forza ever.
Forza 6 Failed to achieve the 90% glory of the series.
In fact the last 2 Halo games 4 and 5 have below 90 average,the last 2 forza have below 90 average,when was the last time a MS game hit 90% on meta.?
2011.?
In fact sony last big AAAE games was a 2013 game call TLOU 95% on meta higher than anything MS or sony it self has release this gen.
MS could not even deliver MCC in good shape and ruined what was a collection of basically AAAE games.
Tomb Raider underperformed,also what the fu** does quality of sony games or being AAAE have to do with Tomb Raider flopping which isn't a damn AAAE game at all.
Nice meltdown bro....
@delta3074 said:
They have both money hatted third party games thats how the Ps1 got so big in the first place (third party exclusives)
They are both as bad as each other when it comes to this, deal with it.
Don't F***ijng act like SONY is a Saintly company and doesn't do things like this, they do, Constantly.
Explain why SF 5 will come to PC but not Xbone if it's not money hatting.
Not even close to what happen back then,if i could name a game or 2 that were probably pay by sony would be MGS and FF7.
You are completely ignoring that sony played its card right,had little to no royalties on the PS1 when Nintendo for years was accuse of abusing 3rd parties with high royalties and in many cases making deals where the developer basically handle the rights to the game,is the reason why some Snes games could not even be made available as collection on PS and other platforms.
3rd parties were sick of Nintendo high ass royalties,The PS1 not only gave them more room for profits but games moved faster to because they were not as expensive to deliver like cardtrige were,you think most games on PS1 were pay by sony to be exclusive and that is not even close to what really happen,the reason the PS was so popular didn't have to do alone with games but also pricing a $50 game vs a $70 game i payed $79 for MK2 on Snes sames for SF2,they were brutal and yet even with those prices 3rd parties received less from Nintendo than what they got with sony.
The PS2 was the same,few games sony pay for anything GTA3 after it became a sucess,and very other few,most PS2 games were exclusives because it was good busines,the PS2 had more than 250 games on the making before it even launch.
Hell who knows if sony didn't even offer money to square a good deal of no royalties every after the sellers cut is your would have sufice vs what Nintendo was doing,didn't help that the N64 arrived in 96 when the PS4 landed on holiday 94.
I personally have no problems with those kind of deals,some people act as not being the same as what sony did with SF5 for me is the same because the end result is the same less platforms getting the game because of a deal,but i don't have a problem with that is business as usual on the console market.
But the reality is the game bombed sales wise and is sad,hell i would have hold it until spring 2016 maybe Jannuary leave some room to gamers to get back on track not every one has the money to buy Fallout,COD blackops Halo and tomb raider at the same time,and that is were preorities kick in.
Log in to comment