:lol:No!!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="lewisg1212"][QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]its just people trying to justify to themselves that they bought the right console. Even if that's true, that's still subjective, but whatever you say. would people really be arguing this much if they had both games? i think notcan someone explain to me why games have to "kill" eachother?
why cant you just let halo be halo, and let killzone be killzone?
mitu123
According to System Wars' standards of going by Gamespot's scores, no. Halo 3's 9.5 is > than Killzone 2's 9.0DonPerian^This
And the sales figures for both games has a say in it as well.
The "Halo Killer" is an awesome idea from a Lem. The word "Killer" (meaning to kill) creates an impossible feat to do because a game is an inanimate object. It's brillant. I like to think it was a Lem who did this. Way to go, good job! ;) If not, ::sigh:: idiot!
are you serious? its all opinions. Anyways I have yet to play the FPS that beats Halo 3. However I tend not to like the realistic shooters I'm more of a sci fi shooter fan
NOPE! lets revisit this when KZ2 has a BILLION online games played.
actually.... lets not, even if KZ2 managed to reach that many played games, it still wouldnt matter because HAlo3 will be that much farther ahead by then and besides....
9.5 >>>>>>9.0
NOPE! lets revisit this when KZ2 has a BILLION online games played.
actually.... lets not, even if KZ2 managed to reach that many played games, it still wouldnt matter because HAlo3 will be that much farther ahead by then and besides....
9.5 >>>>>>9.0
whatisazerg
its just one review. Im asking the general opinion of users
[QUOTE="PrinceofSarcasm"]
very few fps games have a cover system and it has best graphics
DarkGamer007
That doesn't make it better. Say a 2009 games has better graphics than a 2007 game is like saying the Xbox is more powerful than a Nintendo 64....
Halo 3 didnt even have good graphics in 2007. So does that really matter?
Why is everyone talking about Halo 3 again since KZ2's release? There must of been 20 or so threads with Halo in the title in the last 24 hours.angelkimne
They seem determind to prove KZ2>Halo but in every thread it's either unresolved or they've lost the argument. Thus another topic springs up.
Nope, not on any level.
Metacritic scores? No.
Sales? No.
Game itself? No.
It failed to reach it's own hype.
COD4 killed Halo3 on 360 for me... spent much more time online on COD4 (got bot versions for PS3 & 360)... as for KZ2 again i am having more fun playing its mp than i did with Halo3 but that comes down to personal taste..
Also KZ2 didnt need to kill Halo3, KZ2 did what it had to which was live up to its hype, it delivered amazing visuals, solid gameplay, a good sp campaign and a great mp experience..Sure its not perfect, no game is but it delivered... Haters just need to move on while fans need to just focus on enjoying the game..
well few other games has forge and theater modevery few fps games have a cover system and it has best graphics
PrinceofSarcasm
Thats not the general consensus though, the amount of people playing COD4 online never suppased Halo 3, even at its peak.COD4 killed Halo3 on 360 for me... spent much more time online on COD4 (got bot versions for PS3 & 360)... as for KZ2 again i am having more fun playing its mp than i did with Halo3 but that comes down to personal taste..
Also KZ2 didnt need to kill Halo3, KZ2 did what it had to which was live up to its hype, it delivered amazing visuals, solid gameplay, a good sp campaign and a great mp experience..Sure its not perfect, no game is but it delivered... Haters just need to move on while fans need to just focus on enjoying the game..
Malta_1980
50 cent > HaloYou must be kidding.Looked at any sales figures lately???
789shadow
[thnk you come again :)]
great sales, does that mean that pokemon is better than both.You must be kidding.Looked at any sales figures lately???
789shadow
[QUOTE="789shadow"]great sales, does that mean that pokemon is better than both.Ask yourself this: Is Pokemon in the same genre and competing with Halo?You must be kidding.Looked at any sales figures lately???
lbjkurono23
[QUOTE="lbjkurono23"][QUOTE="789shadow"]great sales, does that mean that pokemon is better than both.Ask yourself this: Is Pokemon in the same genre and competing with Halo?You must be kidding.Looked at any sales figures lately???
Stevo_the_gamer
so basically you're saying a gamer should first see how much a game has sold and ONLY buy it cause its selling well???
So since Wii & Wii sports sold so much i must rush to get a Wii & that game ??? (btw these have been taken as an example with no intentions to bash them)
When we are discussing whether game X is better than game Y we should use valid arguments such as gameplay, story, characters/universe, online, graphics and not sales.. Cause if you truly find Halo3 to be an amazing title, you shouldnt carewhether it sells 2 million or 10 million cause it would still remain the SAME game..
[QUOTE="whatisazerg"]
NOPE! lets revisit this when KZ2 has a BILLION online games played.
actually.... lets not, even if KZ2 managed to reach that many played games, it still wouldnt matter because HAlo3 will be that much farther ahead by then and besides....
9.5 >>>>>>9.0
PrinceofSarcasm
its just one review. Im asking the general opinion of users
TC, I can see this thread hasn't gone the way you had planned (or hoped). The basic consensus is: 1) Halo 3 has a higher overall score on GameRankings/Metacritic, which combines scores from multiple sources. 2) Halo 3 sold more copies. 3) Halo 3 continues to have more players online to this day (hence the general opinion of users). Now personally, CoD4 trumped Halo 3, and neither has ever been in the same league as TF2, but KZ2 is a great game so just go enjoy and get over bitter feeling towards Halo!Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment