sounds like if you want to play the absolute worst version of skyrim on the go then this is the version for you
Didn't know you can play the PS3 version on the go.
BURN!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
sounds like if you want to play the absolute worst version of skyrim on the go then this is the version for you
Didn't know you can play the PS3 version on the go.
BURN!
sounds like if you want to play the absolute worst version of skyrim on the go then this is the version for you
Didn't know you can play the PS3 version on the go.
Damnnnnnn
sounds like if you want to play the absolute worst version of skyrim on the go then this is the version for you
Didn't know you can play the PS3 version on the go.
I stand corrected. The Switch version is only the 2nd worst version by a slim margin. Congrats?
Video with John and Richard
Feature on Eurogamer
There was also a brief glimpse at loading times near the end of the recording.
Originally Posted by Richard Leadbetter
But if what we played is indeed fully representative of how the final game shapes up when running in mobile mode, the Switch port of Skyrim should be well worth checking out. We've tried playing the game on an Intel Atom-based tablet with integrated graphics and the experience is nothing like as good as this - if you're looking to play a fully portable Skyrim, you're looking at a larger gaming laptop to offer the visual feature set and performance the Switch version is offering. Ultimately, 15 minutes of hands-on time with a game only goes so far - especially in a vast game like Skyrim - but what we've seen so far holds up really well, and we're looking forward to taking a deeper look at the final release.
Against TX1, it has to be Intel Core Skylake/Kabylake i5/i7 U series IGP.
Are those Tablet processors? I mean in terms of the same price range as the Switch.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price. AMD's Raven Ridge 2-in-1 tablet APU hasn't been release yet.
Video with John and Richard
Feature on Eurogamer
There was also a brief glimpse at loading times near the end of the recording.
Originally Posted by Richard Leadbetter
But if what we played is indeed fully representative of how the final game shapes up when running in mobile mode, the Switch port of Skyrim should be well worth checking out. We've tried playing the game on an Intel Atom-based tablet with integrated graphics and the experience is nothing like as good as this - if you're looking to play a fully portable Skyrim, you're looking at a larger gaming laptop to offer the visual feature set and performance the Switch version is offering. Ultimately, 15 minutes of hands-on time with a game only goes so far - especially in a vast game like Skyrim - but what we've seen so far holds up really well, and we're looking forward to taking a deeper look at the final release.
Against TX1, it has to be Intel Core Skylake/Kabylake i5/i7 U series IGP.
Are those Tablet processors? I mean in terms of the same price range as the Switch.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Against TX1, it has to be Intel Core Skylake/Kabylake i5/i7 U series IGP.
Are those Tablet processors? I mean in terms of the same price range as the Switch.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Both are not comparable with each other except both can play last gen console games in a satisfactory manner. Surface Pro 4 can play some of XBO era games.
When AMD Raven Ridge 2-in-1 APU arrives, it's XBO class gaming on a tablet.
I never did get around to playing Skyrim. Not only is the Switch version more attractive because I can take it with me, but it also has Link swag in it! Who doesn't want to use their Amiibos in Skyrim?
I never did get around to playing Skyrim. Not only is the Switch version more attractive because I can take it with me, but it also has Link swag in it! Who doesn't want to use their Amiibos in Skyrim?
I'll definitely use my Princess Zelda amiibo to play as her in third person mode
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Against TX1, it has to be Intel Core Skylake/Kabylake i5/i7 U series IGP.
Are those Tablet processors? I mean in terms of the same price range as the Switch.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price. AMD's Raven Ridge 2-in-1 tablet APU hasn't been release yet.
I'm not talking about laptop/tablet hybrids, I'm talking about tablet only with the same price range and around the same size as the Switch. Yet you bring up Raven Ridge that isn't even out yet.
Against TX1, it has to be Intel Core Skylake/Kabylake i5/i7 U series IGP.
Are those Tablet processors? I mean in terms of the same price range as the Switch.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Both are not comparable with each other except both can play last gen console games in a satisfactory manner. Surface Pro 4 can play some of XBO era games.
When AMD Raven Ridge 2-in-1 APU arrives, it's XBO class gaming on a tablet.
Right, but that's the thing, you're not getting better than a Tegra X1 at the Switch's price and form factor.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Both are not comparable with each other except both can play last gen console games in a satisfactory manner. Surface Pro 4 can play some of XBO era games.
When AMD Raven Ridge 2-in-1 APU arrives, it's XBO class gaming on a tablet.
Raven Ridge isn't out yet, and we no absolutely nothing how it performs other than a spec sheet nor real-time performance. You bringing up Raven Ridge is simply out of topic.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Both are not comparable with each other except both can play last gen console games in a satisfactory manner. Surface Pro 4 can play some of XBO era games.
When AMD Raven Ridge 2-in-1 APU arrives, it's XBO class gaming on a tablet.
Raven Ridge isn't out yet, and we no absolutely nothing how it performs other than a spec sheet nor real-time performance. You bringing up Raven Ridge is simply out of topic.
Raven Ridge's performance can be estimated from AMD's last 2-in-1 Carrizo APU and expected upgrade gains.
We already know Vega's DCC (memory compression) wasn't updated from Polaris DCC. Carrizo APU uses inferior Tonga DCC when compared to Polaris DCC.
Vega IGP has up to 11 CU. ROPS has direct GPU L2 cache access.
Carrizo IGP has up to 8 CU. ROPS has no direct GPU L2 cache access.
I have rented Toshiba's Carrizo APU based 2-in-1 tablet with FX-8800p "Carrizo" APU. The PC ultra book/tablet market wants Intel Core class CPUs.
I have already have R9-M270 type mobile GCN which is 10 CU and 850 Mhz OC mobile GPU.
I roughly know where Raven Ridge APU's landing range.
I put about 50 hours into Skyrim on the 360 before moving on. Never had an interest in the upgraded version on now gen consoles...
Portable Skyrim though? On the go? In quick spurts of time even where you can do that one mission or task and spread it out over time... That sounds so appealing to me. I'll get this port...
...and hope a fully featured fallout 4 is right around the corner.
Fallout 4 is not a 6 years old past gen game for Switch to be able to play it epicly good as handheld.
Intel's Core U series are usually tablet or 2-in-1 processors and it attracts premium price.
So not comparable to Switch, then
Both are not comparable with each other except both can play last gen console games in a satisfactory manner. Surface Pro 4 can play some of XBO era games.
When AMD Raven Ridge 2-in-1 APU arrives, it's XBO class gaming on a tablet.
Right, but that's the thing, you're not getting better than a Tegra X1 at the Switch's price and form factor.
Actually, i5U Skylake/Kabylake IGP is better than Shield TV's TX1 in Ice Storm benchmarks.
The problem is PC tablets with i5U Skylake/Kabylake IGP doesn't match Switch's price which can be important for certain market segments. This is why AMD's Raven Ridge SoC is needed to lower Intel's premium cost on their 2-in-1 tablet SoC lines.
Not factoring Nintendo, there's very little mobile design wins for NVIDIA TX1 when compared to Intel i5U/i7U Skylake/Kabylake SoCs or Qualcomm Vulkan capable SoCs. NVIDIA was desperate for a big design win for their TX1. Competition is good and it's good to see Nintendo/NVIDIA having a go.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment