PSP 3000 Slim with LBP game($149) or Nintendo 3DS without a game ($249)

[QUOTE="93BlackHawk93"]

HAHAHAHAHAHA! Yeah man, whatever you say! :lol:

DerpyMcDerp

The PSP has blurrier textures, but less jaggies. A fine trade off considering how small the picture is and how close the player is to the screen. :|

250 is a good price for the 3ds the psp which is less powerful and less batterylife launched for the same price as did the psp go , pft 250 expensive then i guess you dont have a 360 or a ps3 or a wii are you that broke .

and for a newer handhedl 3ds is probably the cheapest you wil get

[QUOTE="CDUB316"]

and getting a handheld for power alone is complete and utter fail

Well... just kinda agree. To want this-gen-console like graphics is stupid, but I do expect some good power from a new system. Would you buy a new system with a original GB screen just because the library looks interessting and the battary life is good? I wouldn't and that's probably why I was pretty happy with my GameGear back then that actually had colors, and most agreed that it's better to have colors :S

With the supposed announcement of the PSP2 by the end of this month, the current PSP will become obsolete in a year or two.

The 3DS will not.

En dov.

250 is a good price for the 3ds the psp which is less powerful and less batterylife launched for the same price as did the psp go , pft 250 expensive then i guess you dont have a 360 or a ps3 or a wii are you that broke .

and im not gettin a psp2 my self because it will be more expensive then even a ps3 , i know this , theres no way psp2 will cost the same as the 3ds ,

and for a newer handhedl 3ds is probably the cheapest you wil get

mariokart64fan

Yeah it launched about six years ago and the battery life is on the same ballpark 3DS(3-5 hours 8 if you turn off the 3d, but turning the most touted feature off is kinda silly) vs psp(4-6 hours games, 4-5 video playback) As for th psp go... well that was a disaster.

You people are just too easy....