PS4 1st box 2 launch before rival, while cheaper,more power?

With PS4 having superior performance over XO, its apparent that MS will have a far weaker console this time around. For it to actually be 500 dollars and 100 bucks more than PS4 is insane. Battlefield 4, COD Ghosts, and Need For Speed are all vastly inferior on the XO. Has this ever happened before? How did Sony make the PS4 so affordable, release before XO, and have performance thats head and shoulders over its competition?

No bundled camera

The PS4 Camera is only 60 bucks though. I'm wondering if Sony got a better deal on parts than MS did.

How?

the GameCube cheaper and more powerful than the PS2 - cheaper by $100.

I don't know about the most powerful part but I believe the gamecube was cheaper than the PS2 and more powerful as well.

@NineTailedGoku: the 60 I am sure is no where near the kinect 2.0 it's probably more like the original kinect if anything. It's really small from the unboxing videos too

XBox > Gamecube > PS2 in terms of power

The N64 launched at a lower price than the PS1...but it did launch a year later.

Playstation 1 vs the crazy expensive Saturn !

Resolution, framerate and missing graphical effects.

Gamecube.

N64.

@MFDOOM1983: I wouldn't say vastly. It has been noted games look better on ps4 though. I don't care about that I hope ps4 online can match Xbox ones is my main concern.

Oh yeah, and the Gamecube. Wake up Jim, for Chrissakes.

Xbox360

Those release 1 year after the competition, read the OP.

The Kinect 2 is far superior. The R&D costs alone for the technology must've been outrageous...

Those three titles are bought be millions upon millions who may not even know the difference between upscaled 1080p x 60 FPS and 1080p x 60 FPS.

And how many people do you really think can tell the difference between native 1080p and upscaled 1080p?

nowhere in the OP does it state the consoles need be released within a fortnight of each other.

You have been shown that a cheaper and more powerful console has been released before this upcoming generation eight.

@AutoPilotOn: The gamecube was on par with the xbox and was cheaper than the weaker ps2

I did, your OP has nothing about time frame.

And if you want to talk about time frame, technically the PS4 launches a year after the first console launch of its generation too, so...

ps4 isnt cheaper than the wii u

Well now that you edited the title after being proven wrong, yes I think it is the first.

LOL had to change the topic because you were proven wrong.

owned

Now that you have changed the topic title, no, the Wii U launched first, so the PS4 doesn't qualify under those conditions either.

Someone doesn't understand what vastly means. >.>

The XBox destroyed the gamecube graphically

Just slightly.

Let's be honest Wii U is rival to 360/PS3 and still failed.

Let's be honest, the Wii U is part of the eighth generation, and moving goalposts only makes your argument seem weak.

PS4 camera -- of what we know of it -- is considerably inferior in terms of features and system integration. So it should cost less.

@XxR3m1xInHDn3D: In what way? The GC had faster ram, a better cpu and the gpu, due to its fixed functions, was very efficient and succeeded real world figures. Rebel Strike on the GC had over 20 million polygons, more than any other game that gen, while including bump mapping, shading, and running at 60 fps.

GameCube

-485MHz IBM CPU

-162MHz ATI GPU

-40MB overall RAM

Xbox

-733MHz Intel CPU

-230MHz nVidia GPU

-64MB RAM

Real world performance, Gamecube was pretty damn close to Xbox.

Go Play Doom 3, Far Cry, Half Life 2, Riddick, Black or Chaos Theory and then say that

The differences between BF4 on PS4 and XB1 are practically non existent and there are tons of videos showing this. COD Ghost is suppose to get upscaled to 1080p so again, marginal difference. I havent seen anything on Need for Speed yet, just another one of Nintailedgoku's insecurity threads, move along

@XxR3m1xInHDn3D:

Agreed. I had all three consoles and nothing on GC or PS2 came close to Ninja Gaiden Black, Chronicles of Riddick, Splinter Cell Chaos Theory and Doom 3.

Original Xbox was almost a generation ahead. I remember my friend playing Soul Calibur 2 on Xbox at 720p HD.

I raise you Resident Evil 4

Resident Evil 4 is certainly a great looking game but there are better looking games on the XBox

I agree, but I'm saying the difference wasn't all that massive is all. It was like Xbox 360 and PS3.

Din't have DVD for movies and came more than a year latter re read thread please.

That has nothing to do with the thread. Re-read thread please

Releasing before is a non-issue, as it's only by a week or so. The XOne is so expensive due to Kinect. MS goofed.

NO chance in hell you just have read the right signs.

First one MS will profit from the xbox one or break even on launch,compare that to sony who will lose $60 per unit.

Second didn't the first Kinect had a chip.? Because compute on Kinect 2 is done by GPU on the xbox one,in fact is part of the reason for the whole 10% GPU reservation.

@MightyMuna: The xbox really wasn't a gen ahead. The GC was a factually more powerful console when it came to polygon pushing. Here is an interesting link eexplaining it.

Hi idiot

How do I argue with you again? Oh yeah, something something graphics only matter, something something technology, something something visuals and something something spunkgargleweewee.

I'm not sure about the first Kinect, but I know that the XB1 has a custom audio chip that handles the voice controls. I always assumed that the first Kinect didn't work too well because the crappy Xenon CPU was trying to do too much work..

But, the Kinect 2 is definitely far ahead of anything Sony has. I've watched several demonstration videos, and Kinect 2 actually works very well...

Nah. Its easier to just make fun of you, ikingbobi.

Wouldn't a newer and more powerful console being cheaper be more impressive than if they were released at the same time?

Last Gen must have not counted when the 36o did it.