@flashn00b said:
"Imagine, suffering a PC version of a game ever? Ick" would be every Japanese game developer (minus 3)'s rebuttal.
Not really, because Nioh came to PC.
All of Capcom's stuff comes to PC
Yakuza games are on PC
Ace Combat 7 is on PC
Platinum stuff is on PC
Square has stuff on PC
so that rebuttal would kind of suck.
@SolidGame_basic said:
@jg4xchamp: wow, even Champ approves of Nioh
Why wouldn't I? I've long been the biggest mark of action-jacskon like beat-em ups in the vein of Devil May Cry n Bayonetta n Ninja Gaiden on this forum, highlighting how they are much much better games than the sea of trash that gets gassed up on this forum. Nioh is a lot closer to the quality found in those games combat wise than the the far more simplified shit in Souls or Sekiro.
I don't care for the rpg bullshit attached to Nioh, but it's not a deal breaker. The first games biggest issue was that of content lacking an enemy roster big enough for its run time, and level design not being as legitimately genius as From Software's offering (read not actually bad level design, its quiet solid), but its best enemies and best bosses easily stack up favorably to from software if not mopping the floor with them in some ways.
And there is no conversation to be had, nothing From Software made holds a candle to the depth of Nioh's combat. Not Dark Souls. Not Bloodborne. Not Sekiro.
Log in to comment