[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]
[QUOTE="percech"]I liked Oblivion, but it definitely isn't better. Oblivion doesn't have the swag Skyrim has. Oh and I hate Fallout 3 and Vegas and everything about em. These games are nothing like the Elder Scrolls.MLBknights58
Well, you're right in that they are different from The Elder Scrolls.
Fallout 3 is worse than The Elder Scrolls because the world is so uninteresting.
Fallout: New Vegas is better than ever Elder Scrolls game because the world is so damn interesting, but the tight focus on the branching paths in the story, forcing you to commit to actual decisions makes for one of the best WRPGs in years. New Vegas is true role-playing. Skyrim is open-world dragon-slaying.
Interesting. I found Fallout 3's world so god damn interesting, it's probably tied with Oblivion as my favorite Bethesda game. The atmosphere of that world was incredible, and something about digging through an empty house, scrounging through the kitchen for food, while imagining a family of 4 sitting down to a nice quiet meal years before.. damn I've never been so immersed in a game in my life.
I found New Vegas to be actually more uninteresting than either Fallout 3 or Oblivion.
I got bored of Fallout 3. I loved Oblivion and New Vegas though. Fallout 3 I just couldn't take. 30 hours into it and I was wondering what the point of it all was. But with New Vegas, I jumped in and was in the world immediately. Las Vegas contrasted so much the wild wasteland. I was part city-slicker/gangster and part cowboy/prospector. It made for an awesome combination! Running through canyons where trains used to cross as I got into a gunfight with bandits as I was chasing after slavers. I ended up at a lone ranch where I stayed to heal my wounds and continue the chase. Moments like that let me use my imagination in the world more than Fallout 3 did. I just felt perfectly immersed in New Vegas.
Log in to comment