launch game grafix (56k warnin)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bob_nope_none
bob_nope_none

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bob_nope_none
Member since 2005 • 2105 Posts
for those of you saying that the xbox 360 launch games are horrible (in terms of graphical power look at this comparison of ps1 game medal of honor and timespliters (a ps2 launch game)
Medal of honor

ok now a ps2 launch game timespliters

if you ask me the gun looks better in the medal of honor shot.
now here are some xbox to xbox360 comparisons.

now for the same game but for the xbox 360

well id say there is a much bigger jump in these two games than in the other two. And we all know how games look much better as the console gets older. Now that i think about it i dont know why i went to ign for these pics when i am posting in here lol.
Avatar image for tekkenlaw
tekkenlaw

9598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 tekkenlaw
Member since 2004 • 9598 Posts
I played timeplitters a few weeks ago and it does not look like that, that looks like doom 2. Timesplitters had crappy graphics, but it was good fun.
Avatar image for SER69
SER69

7096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SER69
Member since 2003 • 7096 Posts
It doesnt change the fact that the XBox360 launch is lame.
Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts
It doesnt change the fact that the XBox360 launch is lame.SER69
Avatar image for guch20
guch20

3168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 guch20
Member since 2004 • 3168 Posts

I agree that Xbox 360 puts out some excellent graphics, and we've only seen the tip of the iceburg.  I think the problem lies in the fact that we've become spoiled with the idea of always getting a huge leap in graphics from one console generation to the next, and now that the leap isn't quite as huge, people are disappointed.  It's a shame.

Avatar image for bob_nope_none
bob_nope_none

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 bob_nope_none
Member since 2005 • 2105 Posts
It doesnt change the fact that the XBox360 launch is lame.SER69
uhhhh no but the fact that a lot of the good games were delayed does :P plus if you take the average of all the scores xbox 360 did better than ps2 and xbox gamecube beat it though. and this thread mainly goes out to people who say the xbox 360 aint next gen. Also ill admit that is a pretty bad pic of timespliters its just the onliy one that i thought looked like the medal of honor pic in terms of size and what was going on.
Avatar image for AdolescentDon
AdolescentDon

9081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 AdolescentDon
Member since 2005 • 9081 Posts

[QUOTE="SER69"]It doesnt change the fact that the XBox360 launch is lame.whitetiger3521

I don't agree, PDZ, Kameo, PGR3, COD2 and Condemmed are all really great games.

Thats the most games I have ever wanted that came out with the launch of a console, sure thats only 1 AAA but it's more Solid games all together.

Edit... Add to that DOA4 even though it's not really a launch title.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
This thread is retarded. I can give you way better examples than that.

Soul Blade (PS1)



Soul Calibur (Dreamcast launch title)



Metal Gear Solid (PS1)



Shenmue (Dreamcast)



Super Mario 64 (N64 launch title)



Sonic Adventure (Dreamcast launch title)



The jump between the PS1/N64 graphics and Dreamcast was HUGE. There's no getting around it. You are a deceptive con-man and I have exposed you!
Avatar image for A2D
A2D

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 A2D
Member since 2005 • 4658 Posts
Well done for comparing the 4 player split screen (Which reduces the textures etc.) with the most bland views ever to MOH. You also forget that TimeSplitters had its' own graphical style (Cartoony and basic) that supported tons of onscreen characters and ran as smooth as butter.
Avatar image for AdolescentDon
AdolescentDon

9081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 AdolescentDon
Member since 2005 • 9081 Posts

This thread is retarded. I can give you way better examples than that.

Soul Blade (PS1)



Soul Calibur (Dreamcast launch title)



Metal Gear Solid (PS1)



Shenmue (Dreamcast)



Super Mario 64 (N64 launch title)



Sonic Adventure (Dreamcast launch title)



The jump between the PS1/N64 graphics and Dreamcast was HUGE. There's no getting around it. You are a deceptive con-man and I have exposed you!
Timstuff

So is the Jump from a Dreamcast launch screen to an Xbox 360 launch screen, Infact i'd say it was bigger.

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"] This thread is retarded. I can give you way better examples than that.

Soul Blade (PS1)



Soul Calibur (Dreamcast launch title)



Metal Gear Solid (PS1)



Shenmue (Dreamcast)



Super Mario 64 (N64 launch title)



Sonic Adventure (Dreamcast launch title)



The jump between the PS1/N64 graphics and Dreamcast was HUGE. There's no getting around it. You are a deceptive con-man and I have exposed you!
AdolescentDon

So is the Jump from a Dreamcast launch screen to an Xbox 360 launch screen, Infact i'd say it was bigger.



This can go any way anyone wants depending on what screens you show. But if you compare what were back then "current gen games" on PS1 and N64 with Dreamcast's launch games, there's a much bigger jump. Look at Donkey Kong 64 compared to Sonic Adventure, and Soul Blade or Tekken 3 compared to Soul Calibur. Then, compare Dead or Alive Ultimate with Dead or Alive 4 and the two current Xbox-brand versions of Madden, and the jump is not nearly as big. The point is, Dreamcast managed to outshine the best of what PS1 and N64 had to offer at that time with it's launch games and people definately noticed, but when you compare Xbox 360's launch games with the best of what the current gen has to offer, they are barely distinguishable.
Avatar image for guch20
guch20

3168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 guch20
Member since 2004 • 3168 Posts

So is the Jump from a Dreamcast launch screen to an Xbox 360 launch screen, Infact i'd say it was bigger.

AdolescentDon

One problem with comparing Xbox 360 screens with screens from other consoles is the fact that the games on Xbox 360 are high-definition.  I think a lot of people confuse "sharper looking" with "better looking".

Avatar image for kingsy_the_one
kingsy_the_one

4354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kingsy_the_one
Member since 2003 • 4354 Posts

for those of you saying that the xbox 360 launch games are horrible (in terms of graphical power look at this comparison of ps1 game medal of honor and timespliters (a ps2 launch game)
Medal of honor

ok now a ps2 launch game timespliters

if you ask me the gun looks better in the medal of honor shot.
now here are some xbox to xbox360 comparisons.

now for the same game but for the xbox 360

well id say there is a much bigger jump in these two games than in the other two. And we all know how games look much better as the console gets older. Now that i think about it i dont know why i went to ign for these pics when i am posting in here lol.
bob_nope_none

haha, thats big of you, comparing 1 gen to another :P

Avatar image for gomer69
gomer69

1254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 gomer69
Member since 2003 • 1254 Posts
true
Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#15 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts

the pic you are posting is not like what you said

why enjoy spreading false information to bash PS this much?

if you like 360, that's fine, I don't care, and I don't mind

just go home and play your 360

Avatar image for taker42
taker42

1614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 taker42
Member since 2007 • 1614 Posts
Stop bumping year old threads!
Avatar image for Timesplitter14
Timesplitter14

5934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Timesplitter14
Member since 2006 • 5934 Posts

I played timeplitters a few weeks ago and it does not look like that, that looks like doom 2. Timesplitters had crappy graphics, but it was good fun.
tekkenlaw

Yeah Timesplitters had better graphics than that.... NOOB!

Avatar image for Chloroformality
Chloroformality

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Chloroformality
Member since 2007 • 435 Posts
It doesnt change the fact that the XBox360 launch is lame.SER69
A couple of 360 launch games looked a hell of a lot better than the PS3 launch games. Project Gotham 2, for example. It blew me away because the locals looked as if they were lit with GI (I'm not sure if anyone not educated in Maya knows what that is, exactly).
Avatar image for robbieseclipse
robbieseclipse

520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 robbieseclipse
Member since 2004 • 520 Posts

[QUOTE="tekkenlaw"]I played timeplitters a few weeks ago and it does not look like that, that looks like doom 2. Timesplitters had crappy graphics, but it was good fun.
Timesplitter14

Yeah Timesplitters had better graphics than that.... NOOB!

Thankyou..

i miss timesplitters, such a fun game.Â