Kinect: Do you want it or not?

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
Yes but not right away. Maybe 6 months later when there's more games
Avatar image for svaubel
svaubel

4571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 133

User Lists: 0

#52 svaubel
Member since 2005 • 4571 Posts

Maybe when its down to 50-70$. No accessory should be more than that.

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

its crazy to see ppl wine about the price when it comes with a game:?

im sure 90% of them have bought a rock band setfor 250 bucks

Avatar image for coolkid93
coolkid93

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#54 coolkid93
Member since 2007 • 6749 Posts
No I don't.
Avatar image for _SWAG_
_SWAG_

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 _SWAG_
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

Ima buy it :)

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

I have kinect preordered, so yes.

im actually fairly hyped for it, which i wasnt expecting.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50716 Posts

Nope. Maybe down the line when it's less than $70...

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

_SWAG_

I disagree. I dont think Kinect can make you look silly.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
Do I want Kinect? Yes. I think it will be useful as a remote/interface tool and I also really want to play Dance Central and Sonic Free Riders. Do I want it for 150 dollars? No. More like 70.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50716 Posts

[QUOTE="_SWAG_"]

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

vaderhater

I disagree. I dont think Kinect can make you look silly.

Of course it can, but who cares? As long as it's fun that's all that matters to me. And that's why I don't like Kinect yet, nothing looks fun or interesting.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

[QUOTE="_SWAG_"]

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

Chutebox

I disagree. I dont think Kinect can make you look silly.

Of course it can, but who cares? As long as it's fun that's all that matters to me. And that's why I don't like Kinect yet, nothing looks fun or interesting.

I dont know man, even the most disgruntled game journalists have been giggling like school girls when playing dance central. I have yet to see a video of someone playing that game without a smile from ear to ear.

Avatar image for Karnage108
Karnage108

2595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Karnage108
Member since 2010 • 2595 Posts

Not interested at this time.

I don't like the limitations, software that's available, or the $150 pricepoint.

SolidTy

Pretty much this. It's too much money and the launch games will get boring fast, much like Wii games for me.

Limitations, however, is something we should wait for more reviews or try to experience ourselves before criticizing Kinect. There was a thread not too long ago where someone picked something out of the troubleshooting guide that said not to wear dark clothes in a dark room. I mean.. really? How often does the stuff in a troubleshooting guide actually present some kind of trouble? If anything it says more about the limitations of the person (i.e they're dumb).

Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

I want it for PC when people start making random apps for it that aren't really gaming.hexashadow13

This is the only way I see myself ever using it. On the 360, it will only have crap games.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#65 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
I honestly have no interest in it at this point. What's been shown so far looks like ****. They need to be able to deliver a "traditional" gaming experience for me to dig it. If it's all gimmicks and games specifically designed to compete with the Wii, it's not going to be my cup of tea. If they could deliver AAA games with the Kinect controls and keep them as tight and responsive as they are now, I could get interested. I doubt that will be the case, but I am willing to give it a chance to impress me.
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="hexashadow13"]I want it for PC when people start making random apps for it that aren't really gaming.arto1223

This is the only way I see myself ever using it. On the 360, it will only have crap games.

do you remember games originally designed for the mouse? solitaire and minesweeper... all casual fair. It wasnt until quake 2 that we actually saw the mouse incorporated by default into hardcore games.

Nowadays its hard to imagine when there used to be no freelook in fps games... maybe one day it will be hard to imagine when we couldnt move our head to peek around corners in fps games.

i wouldnt write off camera based input for video games.

Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#67 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts

do you remember games originally designed for the mouse? solitaire and minesweeper... all casual fair. It wasnt until quake 2 that we actually saw the mouse incorporated by default into hardcore games.

Nowadays its hard to imagine when there used to be no freelook in fps games... maybe one day it will be hard to imagine when we couldnt move our head to peek around corners in fps games.

i wouldnt write off camera based input for video games.

markinthedark
Fair point, I just don't think the technology is quite there yet, nor are they going to spend as much time making games that really push the envelope as they will marketing it as if it does. In the future, maybe...
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

_SWAG_

Lol. I don't know, but this looks pretty silly.

http://kotaku.com/5678383/the-playstation-move-push-gets-weirder

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

do you remember games originally designed for the mouse? solitaire and minesweeper... all casual fair. It wasnt until quake 2 that we actually saw the mouse incorporated by default into hardcore games.

Nowadays its hard to imagine when there used to be no freelook in fps games... maybe one day it will be hard to imagine when we couldnt move our head to peek around corners in fps games.

i wouldnt write off camera based input for video games.

Hahadouken

Fair point, I just don't think the technology is quite there yet, nor are they going to spend as much time making games that really push the envelope as they will marketing it as if it does. In the future, maybe...

Yea its definitely not there yet. But i think any tech enthusiast knows in a couple years time whatever bleeding edge device they buy is going to be near worthless within the span of a couple years. I mean anytime you spend $600 for that latest and greatest graphics card... 2 years later you can buy something that makes it look like hot garbage for half the price. We know it, but we buy it anyway.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

[QUOTE="hexashadow13"]I want it for PC when people start making random apps for it that aren't really gaming.markinthedark

This is the only way I see myself ever using it. On the 360, it will only have crap games.

do you remember games originally designed for the mouse? solitaire and minesweeper... all casual fair. It wasnt until quake 2 that we actually saw the mouse incorporated by default into hardcore games.

Nowadays its hard to imagine when there used to be no freelook in fps games... maybe one day it will be hard to imagine when we couldnt move our head to peek around corners in fps games.

i wouldnt write off camera based input for video games.

Nah RTS's like command and conquer and various building/management type games had mouse a few years prior to FPS using them.Maybe thats true for FPS but sure as hell aint for "hardcore" it was done for various big well known games before it so dont think that it wasnt till then cause it was default for a few other hardcore genre's.
Avatar image for 2muchsoul
2muchsoul

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 2muchsoul
Member since 2008 • 64 Posts
I might sound like a broken record but I could care less for motion control peripherals with 360/PS3.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#72 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
[QUOTE="gago-gago"]

[QUOTE="_SWAG_"]

the pricepoint is freakin $150 thats too expensive for a camera. it doesnt have hardcore games and its gonna me look silly playing it. i only like looking cool when i play games and the move makes me look cool and hardcore because it has hardcore games. kinect doesnt have any

Lol. I don't know, but this looks pretty silly.

http://kotaku.com/5678383/the-playstation-move-push-gets-weirder

Where did it all go wrong this gen?
Avatar image for Elutheria
Elutheria

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Elutheria
Member since 2003 • 286 Posts
If I wanted broken controls and shovelware I would dust off my Wii.
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="markinthedark"]

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

This is the only way I see myself ever using it. On the 360, it will only have crap games.

razgriz_101

do you remember games originally designed for the mouse? solitaire and minesweeper... all casual fair. It wasnt until quake 2 that we actually saw the mouse incorporated by default into hardcore games.

Nowadays its hard to imagine when there used to be no freelook in fps games... maybe one day it will be hard to imagine when we couldnt move our head to peek around corners in fps games.

i wouldnt write off camera based input for video games.

Nah RTS's like command and conquer and various building/management type games had mouse a few years prior to FPS using them.Maybe thats true for FPS but sure as hell aint for "hardcore" it was done for various big well known games before it so dont think that it wasnt till then cause it was default for a few other hardcore genre's.

yeah honestly, i almost went back and edited... because i knew i was wrong. But i felt the principle held true, and i still do. Fps was just the only genre i knew well enough (back in the day i didnt have many other genres of PC games). I knew something had to have been mouse based earlier.

And i knew someone would point it out. But i think the underlying principle still is true... in that a new tech... like a mouse... starts off with crap games... eventually moves to games with optional support... and then finally settles on games requiring the new technology.

I dont know if camera based inputs will blaze a similar trail, but i dont think it is too dissimilar.

Avatar image for Leo-Magic
Leo-Magic

3025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Leo-Magic
Member since 2005 • 3025 Posts
so many cows here!! anyway Im getting it for sure.
Avatar image for erglesmergle
erglesmergle

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 erglesmergle
Member since 2009 • 1769 Posts

Do I want garbage? I think not.

Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

Nope.

It is a big step into the future of input devices, however right now is just not the right time for it.

Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#78 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

if i had money to burn i would get it, but realistically i wont

Avatar image for jackdaniel594
jackdaniel594

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 jackdaniel594
Member since 2009 • 131 Posts

already have an eyetoy, and its identical, in the stuff it does anyway

Avatar image for sakura_Ex
sakura_Ex

3066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 sakura_Ex
Member since 2007 • 3066 Posts
I would rather eat broken glass.
Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
I dont know i have to try it for myself to decide!
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
I already preordered it
Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#83 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
It's hard to say at this point. Kinect does it have potential. MS needs to prove it can do more than just casual titles like Kinectimals. Forza kinect is even casualized. You have to pass slower cars as quickly as you can. FPS games i can't see working though. How are you suppost to fire and aim with your bare hands? A lot of potential. Let's see if MS can meet that potential.
Avatar image for nexus303
nexus303

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 nexus303
Member since 2004 • 204 Posts

Totally, pre-ordered and raring to go :-D

Avatar image for Installing
Installing

678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Installing
Member since 2010 • 678 Posts

I imagine I'll be able to get a heck of a lot more entertainment from the Steam sales with $150.